Researcher(s) |
Blakely Paynter (Department of Agriculture) |
---|---|
Year(s) | 2002 |
Contributor | Liebe Group |
Trial location(s) |
Buntine, WA
|
To evaluate the response of eighteen barley lines for grain yield, grain quality and malting quality to changes in soil pH (due to liming).
Reponse to barley lines in this trial was different to what was expeted based on past performance in acid soil CVT trials.
Lead research organisation |
Department of Agriculture and Food WA |
---|---|
Host research organisation | N/A |
Trial funding source | GRDC DAW00059 |
Related program | N/A |
Acknowledgments |
This reserach was funded by the Departmetn of Agriculture and GRDC. Technical assistance was undertaken by Bethany Lauk and Peta Dunkerton. Trials were sown and harvested by the Geraldton Research Support Unit. The support of the Diamond’s in allowing us to conduct this research is much appreciated. Mario D’Antuono provided statistical assistance. |
Other trial partners | Not specified |
Crop type | Cereal (Grain): Barley |
---|---|
Treatment type(s) |
|
Trial type | Experimental |
Trial design | Randomised,Replicated,Blocked |
Sow rate or Target density | 150 plants/m2 |
---|---|
Sow date | 11 June 2002 |
Harvest date | Not specified |
Plot size | 15m x 1.54m |
Plot replication | 3 |
Paddock history | 2001 = pasture, 2000 = wheat, 1999 = lupins, 1998 = wheat, 1997 = lupins, 1996 = wheat |
Fertiliser |
50 kg N/ha, 30 kg P/ha and 40 kg K/ha at seeding |
# | Variety |
Treatment 1
|
Grain yield (t/ha) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | █ Baudin | █ 0 Lime | 0.65 |
2 | █ Baudin | █ 1t Lime | 0.93 |
3 | █ Baudin | █ 2t Lime | 1.24 |
4 | █ Brindabella | █ 0 Lime | 0.46 |
5 | █ Brindabella | █ 1t Lime | 0.75 |
6 | █ Brindabella | █ 2t Lime | 1.18 |
7 | █ Gairdner | █ 0 Lime | 0.63 |
8 | █ Gairdner | █ 1t Lime | 0.67 |
9 | █ Gairdner | █ 2t Lime | 1.43 |
10 | █ Hamelin | █ 0 Lime | 0.76 |
11 | █ Hamelin | █ 1t Lime | 1.19 |
12 | █ Hamelin | █ 2t Lime | 1.42 |
13 | █ Molloy | █ 0 Lime | 0.73 |
14 | █ Molloy | █ 1t Lime | 1.27 |
15 | █ Molloy | █ 2t Lime | 1.41 |
16 | █ Mundah | █ 0 Lime | 0.63 |
17 | █ Mundah | █ 1t Lime | 1.15 |
18 | █ Mundah | █ 2t Lime | 1.57 |
19 | █ Schooner | █ 0 Lime | 0.73 |
20 | █ Schooner | █ 1t Lime | 1.05 |
21 | █ Schooner | █ 2t Lime | 1.29 |
22 | █ Skiff | █ 0 Lime | 0.67 |
23 | █ Skiff | █ 1t Lime | 1.2 |
24 | █ Skiff | █ 2t Lime | 1.39 |
25 | █ Stirling | █ 0 Lime | 0.64 |
26 | █ Stirling | █ 1t Lime | 0.87 |
27 | █ Stirling | █ 2t Lime | 1.11 |
28 | █ W92%794 | █ 0 Lime | 0.87 |
29 | █ W92%794 | █ 1t Lime | 1.25 |
30 | █ W92%794 | █ 2t Lime | 1.71 |
31 | █ WABAR2109 | █ 0 Lime | 0.76 |
32 | █ WABAR2109 | █ 1t Lime | 1.27 |
33 | █ WABAR2109 | █ 2t Lime | 1.45 |
34 | █ WABAR2147 | █ 0 Lime | 0.56 |
35 | █ WABAR2147 | █ 1t Lime | 1.11 |
36 | █ WABAR2147 | █ 2t Lime | 0.95 |
37 | █ Wabar2175 | █ 0 Lime | 0.67 |
38 | █ Wabar2175 | █ 1t Lime | 0.78 |
39 | █ Wabar2175 | █ 2t Lime | 1.29 |
40 | █ Wb223 | █ 0 Lime | 0.55 |
41 | █ Wb223 | █ 1t Lime | 0.99 |
42 | █ Wb223 | █ 2t Lime | 1.5 |
43 | █ Wb229 | █ 0 Lime | 0.57 |
44 | █ Wb229 | █ 1t Lime | 0.81 |
45 | █ Wb229 | █ 2t Lime | 1.2 |
46 | █ WB230 | █ 0 Lime | 0.53 |
47 | █ WB230 | █ 1t Lime | 1 |
48 | █ WB230 | █ 2t Lime | 1.25 |
49 | █ WB240 | █ 0 Lime | 0.49 |
50 | █ WB240 | █ 1t Lime | 0.86 |
51 | █ WB240 | █ 2t Lime | 1.04 |
52 | █ Yambla | █ 0 Lime | 0.33 |
53 | █ Yambla | █ 1t Lime | 0.82 |
54 | █ Yambla | █ 2t Lime | 0.77 |
SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.