Practice for Profit 2006

2006
CC BY 4.0

Research organisaton

Trial details

Researcher(s) Darren Chitty (AgriTech)
Year(s) 2006
Contributor Liebe Group
Trial location(s) Buntine, WA
Practice for Profit 2006 locations
Aims

To determine optimal input packages for commonly grown wheat varieties in the Buntine area.

Key messages

Crop vigour: the low input treatments showed the least amount of vigour; a direct result of minimal nitrogen and a low seeding rate.

Lead research organisation N/A
Host research organisation N/A
Related program N/A
Acknowledgments

Thanks to Liebe Group and Farmanco.

  • Paper reviewed by Ashley Bacon.

Other trial partners Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop type Cereal (Grain): Wheat
Treatment type(s)
  • Fertiliser: Application Method
  • Herbicide: Application Method
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Replicated

Buntine 2006

Sow date 27 May 2006
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size 9m x 3m
Plot replication 3
Fertiliser

as per treatments

Herbicide

as per treatments

Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information

Download results

Trial results Table 1

# Variety
Treatment 1
Protein (%) Grain yield (t/ha) Gross margin ($/ha) Screenings (%)
1 Arrino Active Input 12.5 0.48 21.06 2.8
2 Arrino District Input 14.1 0.4 -22.74 3.6
3 Arrino High Input 13.6 0.72 -86.47 3.3
4 Arrino Low Input 13.5 0.39 32.16 2.4
5 Bonnie Rock Active Input 13 0.46 20.25 6.5
6 Bonnie Rock District Input 14.2 0.38 -26.25 9.5
7 Bonnie Rock High Input 14.1 0.52 -126.15 8.4
8 Bonnie Rock Low Input 138 0.47 50.66 8
9 Calingiri Active Input 11.4 0.57 40.39 5.2
10 Calingiri District Input 13.2 0.56 7.58 6
11 Calingiri High Input 13.5 0.51 -134.15 6.2
12 Calingiri Low Input 12.5 0.51 55.64 4.7
13 Wyalkatchem Active Input 11.5 0.38 0.44 4.8
14 Wyalkatchem District Input 14.1 0.37 -25.67 4.2
15 Wyalkatchem High Input 13.7 0.51 -127.04 4.3
16 Wyalkatchem Low Input 12.5 0.49 58.85 3.6

Grain yield t/ha


Loading

Gross margin $/ha


Loading

Protein %


Loading

Screenings %


Loading
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Site Depth Type pH EC P K N A OC CAT
Buntine, WA 0 - 10cm Sandy loam
Buntine, WA 10 - 30cm Sandy loam
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Buntine, WA Sandy loam
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
Buntine, WA Kandosol
Soil Moisture Source: BOM/ANU
Average amount of water stored in the soil profile during the year, estimated by the OzWALD model-data fusion system.
Year Buntine WA
2006 279.4mm
2005 252.1mm
2004 257.2mm
2003 275.7mm
2002 235.0mm
2001 272.4mm
2000 336.4mm
National soil grid Source: CSIRO/TERN
NOTE: National Soil Grid data is aggregated information for background information on the wider area
Actual soil values can vary significantly in a small area and the trial soil tests are the most relevant data where available

Soil properties

Loading

Climate

Buntine WA 2006


Observed climate information

Rainfall trial gsr (mm) 122mm

Derived climate information

Buntine WA

Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.

Trial report and links

2006 trial report