Evaluation of dual purpose cereal varieties

2005
CC BY 4.0

Research organisaton

Trial details

Researcher(s) Brett Davey (SFS)
Geoff Dean (DPIWE)
Simon Munford (DPIWE)
Year(s) 2005
Contributor Southern Farming Systems
Trial location(s) Nile, TAS
Evaluation of dual purpose cereal varieties locations
Aims

The aim of this trial was to assess dual purpose wheat, triticale and oat varieties for dry matter production, recovery from grazing and grain yield.

Key messages

Grain yield after two dry matter cuts tended to be lower than for one cut for nearly all lines with an average of nearly 0.6t/ha difference.

Lead research organisation N/A
Host research organisation N/A
Related program N/A
Acknowledgments

Michael Chilvers, Rob Bradley.


Other trial partners Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop types Forage: Oats Cereal (Grain): Triticale Cereal (Grain): Wheat
Treatment type(s)
  • Crop: Type
  • Crop: Variety
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Unknown

Nile 2005 Oats

Sow date 18 March 2005
Harvest date 13 January 2006
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified
Other trial notes

Approximate location

Nile 2005 Triticale

Sow date Not specified
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified
Other trial notes

Approximate location

Nile 2005 Wheat

Sow date Not specified
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified
Other trial notes

Approximate location

Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information

Download results

Trial results Table 1

# Variety
Dry matter (t/ha) Grain yield (t/ha)
1 SPA Trit (triticale) 2.06 7.91
2 Marombi (wheat) 2.02 7.04
3 H123.1 (wheat) 1.93 7.8
4 K89.44 (wheat) 1.9 9.37
5 Brennan (wheat) 1.89 7.91
6 96188.18 (wheat) 1.88 7.49
7 Mackellar (wheat) 1.88 7.68
8 95102.1 (wheat) 1.81 10.29
9 Crackerjack (triticale) 1.8 7.48
10 LH 50M16 (wheat) 1.77 6.72
11 H150.2 (wheat) 1.74 8.62
12 95192.14 (wheat) 1.73 7.58
13 H154.4 (wheat) 1.67 8.6
14 K37.18 (wheat) 1.67 8.1
15 LH49E2 (wheat) 1.55 8.06
16 Tennant (wheat) 1.54 7.67
17 Bass (oat) 1.42 5.28
18 Teesdale (wheat) 1.25 9.41

Grain yield t/ha


Loading

Dry matter t/ha


Loading
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Not specified
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Nile, TAS Not specified
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
Nile, TAS Sodosol
Soil Moisture Source: BOM/ANU
Average amount of water stored in the soil profile during the year, estimated by the OzWALD model-data fusion system.
Year Nile TAS
2005 296.6mm
2004 318.2mm
2003 385.5mm
2002 439.4mm
2001 497.5mm
2000 548.2mm
National soil grid Source: CSIRO/TERN
NOTE: National Soil Grid data is aggregated information for background information on the wider area
Actual soil values can vary significantly in a small area and the trial soil tests are the most relevant data where available

Soil properties

Loading

Climate

Derived climate information

No observed climate data available for this trial.
Derived climate data is determined from trial site location and national weather sources.

Nile TAS

NOTE: Exact trial site locality unknown - Climate data may not be accurate
Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.



Trial last modified: 18-11-2019 10:17am AEST