Evaluation of dual purpose cereal varieties

2006
CC BY 4.0

Research organisaton

Trial details

Researcher(s) Brett Davey (SFS)
Geoff Dean (SFS)
Simon Munford (DPIW)
Year(s) 2006
Contributor Southern Farming Systems
Trial location(s) Perth, TAS
Evaluation of dual purpose cereal varieties locations
Aims

To assess dual purpose wheat, barley, triticale and oat varieties for DM production, recovery from grazing and grain yield. Given that cereals have different rates of DM production, 

Key messages

Winter and spring wheat, barley, triticale and oat lines were evaluated for fodder dry matter production and grain yield. The two barley varieties and a spring wheat produced the highest dry matter (DM) in the first cut. However their recovery was poor and DM production from the second cut was significantly lower than for all other material.

Lead research organisation N/A
Host research organisation N/A
Related program N/A
Acknowledgments

Bill Chilvers, Rob Bradley


Other trial partners Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop types Forage: Oats Cereal (Grain): Triticale Cereal (Grain): Wheat Cereal (Grain): Barley
Treatment type(s)
  • Crop: Type
  • Crop: Variety
Trial type
Trial design

Perth 2006 Oats

Sow date Not specified
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified

Perth 2006 Triticale

Sow date Not specified
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified

Perth 2006 Wheat

Sow date Not specified
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified

Perth 2006 Barley

Sow date 14 March 2006
Harvest date 24 January 2007
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information

Download results

Trial results Table 1

# Variety
Grain yield (t/ha) Dry matter (t/ha)
1 Yalamba 4.52 2.42
2 Bass 4.29 2.9
3 Tennant 3.75 1.85
4 HRZ03.0003 3.75 2.25
5 Yerong 2.94 2.22
6 95102.1 2.79 2.35
7 K89.44 1.97 1.94
8 Breakwell 1.53 2.62
9 Mackellar+Breakwell 1.22 2.29
10 Teesdale 1.15 1.53
11 Mackellar 1.08 2.26
12 Mackellar+Spring Wheat 0.94 2.93
13 H123.1 0.83 2.05
14 Mackellar+Quamby 0.65 2.82
15 Brennan 0.47 2.12

Grain yield t/ha


Loading

Dry matter t/ha


Loading
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Not specified
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Perth, TAS Not specified
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
Perth, TAS Sodosol
Soil Moisture Source: BOM/ANU
Average amount of water stored in the soil profile during the year, estimated by the OzWALD model-data fusion system.
Year Perth TAS
2006 177.7mm
2005 184.6mm
2004 189.7mm
2003 207.1mm
2002 232.4mm
2001 318.4mm
2000 458.2mm
National soil grid Source: CSIRO/TERN
NOTE: National Soil Grid data is aggregated information for background information on the wider area
Actual soil values can vary significantly in a small area and the trial soil tests are the most relevant data where available

Soil properties

Loading

Climate

Derived climate information

No observed climate data available for this trial.
Derived climate data is determined from trial site location and national weather sources.

Perth TAS

NOTE: Exact trial site locality unknown - Climate data may not be accurate
Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.



Trial last modified: 18-11-2019 11:23am AEST