Evaluation of dual purpose cereal varieties

2007
CC BY 4.0

Research organisaton
Funding sources

Trial details

Researcher(s) Greg Forster (SFS)
Year(s) 2007
Contributor Southern Farming Systems
Trial location(s) Bairnsdale, VIC
Evaluation of dual purpose cereal varieties locations
Aims

To determine:

  • Which dual purpose cereal varieties respond favorably to Gippsland’s climatic conditions.
  • Which new varieties may have commercialization potential.
  • Which varieties are best suited to forage and grain production.
Key messages

The results of Trial 1 (forage and grain) have shown that Yerong Barley, 5092 Barley and Monstress Triticale produced the most dry matter (DM/Ha) up to GS30 for grazing. Amarok and Wedgetail produced the most dry matter of the wheat varieties. For Hay production (GS85), Wedgetail produced the most dry matter followed by Rudd and the HRZ03.1010.3 wheat variety. In total (Grazing and Hay), Wedgetail outperformed all varieties producing the most dry matter.

Lead research organisation N/A
Host research organisation N/A
Trial funding source Grain & Graze
Trial funding source NLP
Related program N/A
Acknowledgments

Trial Site Committee (Murray Stewart, Trevor Caithness, Tony Murray, Rick Frew, Rowan Paulet, Andrew Sheridan, Simon Hunt and Brian Fairhall), Rose Maher, John Chester, Frank Mickan, Chris Bluett, Wes Arnott, Gary Sheppard, Sam Cockayne and the East Gippsland Shire.


Other trial partners Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop types Cereal (Grain): Triticale Cereal (Grain): Wheat Cereal (Grain): Barley
Treatment type(s)
  • Crop: Type
  • Crop: Variety
  • Sowing: Timing
Trial type
Trial design

Bairnsdale 2007 Triticale

Sow date Not specified
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified

Bairnsdale 2007 Wheat

Sow date Not specified
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified

Bairnsdale 2007 Barley

Sow date Not specified
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size 20m x 2m
Plot replication Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information

Download results

Trial results Table 1

# Variety
Treatment 1
Protein (%) Grain yield (t/ha) 1000 grain weight (g) Screenings (%) Test weight (kg/hL) Dry matter (t/ha)
1 Amarok Late sowing (early June), no grazing 9.8 4.11 36.1 2.3 72.7
2 HRZ 03.1010.3 Late sowing (early June), no grazing 10.1 3.46 28.9 1.9 67.8
3 Rudd Late sowing (early June), no grazing 10.2 3.43 33.3 2.4 63.1
4 Wedgetail Late sowing (early June), no grazing 10.3 3.43 30.1 2.1 69.2
5 HRZ 95102 Late sowing (early June), no grazing 9.2 3.95 33.3 3.4 68.2
6 Mackellar Late sowing (early June), no grazing 9.9 3.01 NR NR NR
7 Marombi Late sowing (early June), no grazing 10.2 2.87 32.8 1.8 71.4
8 CSIRO 170 Late sowing (early June), no grazing 9.7 4.05 32.3 2.3 68.1
9 Yerong barley Late sowing (early June), no grazing 10.2 3.41 32.7 3.6 55.8
10 5092 Barley Late sowing (early June), no grazing 9.5 4.16 33.1 4.4 52.1
11 Monstress Triticale Late sowing (early June), no grazing 10 3.39 33.4 2.5 62.9
12 Amarok Early sowing (late March), grazing pre GS 32 9.8 2.65 31.4 1.4 73.6 11.618
13 HRZ 03.1010.3 Early sowing (late March), grazing pre GS 32 10.2 2.4 31.8 1.9 67.8 13.513
14 Rudd Early sowing (late March), grazing pre GS 32 9.9 2.57 33.7 0.9 68.5 14.478
15 Wedgetail Early sowing (late March), grazing pre GS 32 10.2 2.4 30.8 1.6 67.6 14.912
16 HRZ 95102 Early sowing (late March), grazing pre GS 32 9.5 2.56 35.2 1.8 71.7 11.395
17 Mackellar Early sowing (late March), grazing pre GS 32 9.6 2.79 NR NR NR 11.85
18 Marombi Early sowing (late March), grazing pre GS 32 9.8 2.27 31.3 1.3 71.7 13.08
19 CSIRO 170 Early sowing (late March), grazing pre GS 32 10.1 2.58 34.7 1.2 71.8 12.151
20 Yerong barley Early sowing (late March), grazing pre GS 32 10.8 2.08 33.6 5.3 44.6 13.248
21 5092 Barley Early sowing (late March), grazing pre GS 32 10.4 2.24 28.8 5 49.4 12.355
22 Monstress Triticale Early sowing (late March), grazing pre GS 32 10.2 1.73 31.2 2.3 65.2 12.688

Grain yield t/ha


Loading

1000 grain weight g


Loading

Dry matter t/ha


Loading

Protein %


Loading

Screenings %


Loading

Test weight kg/hL


Loading
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Not specified
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Bairnsdale, VIC Not specified
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
Bairnsdale, VIC Chromosol
Soil Moisture Source: BOM/ANU
Average amount of water stored in the soil profile during the year, estimated by the OzWALD model-data fusion system.
Year Bairnsdale VIC
2007 613.9mm
2006 634.8mm
2005 623.7mm
2004 603.7mm
2003 534.5mm
2002 548.4mm
2001 526.9mm
2000 505.4mm
National soil grid Source: CSIRO/TERN
NOTE: National Soil Grid data is aggregated information for background information on the wider area
Actual soil values can vary significantly in a small area and the trial soil tests are the most relevant data where available

Soil properties

Loading

Climate

Derived climate information

No observed climate data available for this trial.
Derived climate data is determined from trial site location and national weather sources.

Bairnsdale VIC

Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.



Trial last modified: 20-11-2019 15:30pm AEST