DPI wheat variety trials with and without fungicide

2009
CC BY 4.0

Research organisaton
Funding source

Trial details

Researcher(s) Chris Bluett (DPI)
Angela Clough (DPI)
Mick Keating (DPI)
Year(s) 2009
Contributor Southern Farming Systems
Trial location(s) Hamilton, VIC
Inverleigh, VIC
Mininera, VIC
DPI wheat variety trials with and without fungicide locations
Aims

To allow grain growers to assess the grain yields of released and upcoming wheat varieties under “with
fungicide” and “without fungicide” management regimes.

Key messages
  • Growers' choice of wheat variety in south-west Victoria must take into account the possible need for fungicide sprays to protect some varieties from leaf diseases, in particular stripe and leaf rusts.
  • Wheat growers who are not fully prepared to adopt an adequate regime of correctly timed fungicide sparys should choose only varieties that have high levels of resistance to Stripe Rust and Leaf Rust.
  • As new strains of both rusts appear very regularly, varieties may rapidly lose their resistance.
  • It is very important to check the disease ratings of your chosen varieties every year.
Lead research organisation N/A
Host research organisation N/A
Trial funding source GRDC
Related program N/A
Acknowledgments
  • Fully funded by Grains Research and Development Corporation.
  • Thanks to Josh Walter at Inverleigh, Graeme Moyle at Hamilton and SFS & its Streatham Branch at Mininera for the provision of land. The researchers are grateful to Agrisearch Services, Longreach Plant Breeders, CSIRO and AGT who supplied seed for the trials and agreed to have crossbred results published, and to Nick Poole, FAR NZ, for his assistance with designing the fungicide regime.
  • Thanks to DPI plant pathologist Grant Hollaway for scoring all three sites for stripe rust, a long and arduous task. Trial design and biometric analysis was conducted by biometric consultant, Gavin Kearney.

Other trial partners Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop type Cereal (Grain): Wheat
Treatment type(s)
  • Crop: Variety
  • Fungicide: Application Method
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Randomised,Replicated,Blocked

Hamilton 2009

Sow date Not specified
Harvest date 30 December 2009
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified

Inverleigh 2009

Sow date Not specified
Harvest date 21 December 2009
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified

Mininera 2009

Sow date Not specified
Harvest date 29 December 2009
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information

Download results

Trial results Minimera site results

# Variety
Treatment 1
Grain yield (t/ha)
1 Barham no fungicide 3.83
2 Beaufort no fungicide 5.84
3 Bolac no fungicide 4.63
4 Chara no fungicide 4.72
5 CD 150.1 no fungicide 4.63
6 Derrimut no fungicide 4.82
7 Diamondbird no fungicide 5.2
8 EGA Gregory no fungicide 5.03
9 Ega Wedgetail no fungicide 4.9
10 Endure no fungicide 4.66
11 Espada no fungicide 5.62
12 Frelon no fungicide 5.27
13 Gascoigne no fungicide 5.19
14 Hyperno no fungicide 4.08
15 Kellalac no fungicide 5.11
16 Lincoln no fungicide 5.35
17 LPB 04-0965 no fungicide 5.89
18 LR 03-0112 no fungicide 5.3
19 Mackellar no fungicide 4.21
20 Naparoo no fungicide 4.66
21 Preston no fungicide 5.98
22 RAC 1412 no fungicide 4.94
23 Sentinel no fungicide 5.59
24 SQP Revenue no fungicide 4.98
25 Sunzell no fungicide 4.97
26 VV0129 no fungicide 4.45
27 VV2089 no fungicide 5.02
28 VV2582 no fungicide 5.27
29 WW12885 no fungicide 5.03
30 Yenda no fungicide 4.36
31 Barham fungicide 4.72
32 Beaufort fungicide 5.89
33 Bolac fungicide 5.53
34 Chara fungicide 5.54
35 CS 150.1 fungicide 4.51
36 Derrimut fungicide 5.16
37 Diamondbird fungicide 4.9
38 EGA Gregory fungicide 5.45
39 Ega Wedgetail fungicide 4.02
40 Endure fungicide 5.26
41 Espada fungicide 5.96
42 Frelon fungicide 4.75
43 Gascoigne fungicide 5.2
44 Hyperno fungicide 3.65
45 Kellalac fungicide 5.19
46 Lincoln fungicide 5.7
47 LPB 04-0965 fungicide 5.44
48 LR 03-0112 fungicide 5.32
49 Mackellar fungicide 4.79
50 Naparoo fungicide 4.67
51 Preston fungicide 5.64
52 RAC 1412 fungicide 5.03
53 Sentinel fungicide 5.24
54 SQP Revenue fungicide 4.29
55 Sunzell fungicide 5.36
56 VV0129 fungicide 5.06
57 VV2089 fungicide 5.24
58 VV2582 fungicide 5.72
59 WW12885 fungicide 5.44
60 Yenda fungicide 4.68

Grain yield t/ha


Loading

Trial results Hamilton site results

# Variety
Grain yield (t/ha)
1 Barham no fungicide 3.81
2 Beaufort no fungicide 5.78
3 Bolac no fungicide 5.52
4 Chara no fungicide 4.83
5 CS150.1 no fungicide 5.22
6 Derrimut no fungicide 5.17
7 Diamondbird no fungicide 4.94
8 EGA Gregory no fungicide 5.41
9 Ega Wedgetail no fungicide 5.06
10 Endure no fungicide 5.18
11 Espada no fungicide 6.35
12 Frelon no fungicide 5.61
13 Gascoigne no fungicide 5.67
14 HRZ3.0065 no fungicide 4.97
15 HRZ3.0069 no fungicide 5
16 HRZ3.0086 no fungicide 3.65
17 Hyperno no fungicide 4.17
18 Kellalac no fungicide 4.25
19 Lincoln no fungicide 5.48
20 LPB04-0965 no fungicide 5.72
21 LR03-0112 no fungicide 5.66
22 Mackellar no fungicide 5.31
23 Naparoo no fungicide 3.45
24 Preston no fungicide 6.48
25 RAC1412 no fungicide 5.92
26 Sentinel no fungicide 5.95
27 SQP Revenue no fungicide 5.67
28 Sunzell no fungicide 4.32
29 VV0129 no fungicide 5.57
30 VV02089 no fungicide 5.78
31 VV2852 no fungicide 5.58
32 WW12885 no fungicide 5.88
33 Yenda no fungicide 3.82
34 Barham fungicide 3.6
35 Beaufort fungicide 5.81
36 Bolac fungicide 5.43
37 Chara fungicide 6.22
38 CS150.1 fungicide 5.14
39 Derrimut fungicide 6.32
40 Diamondbird fungicide 5.2
41 EGA Gregory fungicide 5.29
42 Ega Wedgetail fungicide 5.01
43 Endure fungicide 5.66
44 Espada fungicide 6.96
45 Frelon fungicide 6.18
46 Gascoigne fungicide 6.1
47 HRZ3.0065 fungicide 5.4
48 HRZ3.0069 fungicide 5.4
49 HRZ3.0086 fungicide 4.18
50 Hyperno fungicide 3.57
51 Kellalac fungicide 4.84
52 Lincoln fungicide 5.94
53 LPB04-0965 fungicide 6.02
54 LR03-0112 fungicide 5.7
55 Mackellar fungicide 6.02
56 Naparoo fungicide 3.41
57 Preston fungicide 7.17
58 RAC1412 fungicide 6.13
59 Sentinel fungicide 5.59
60 SQP Revenue fungicide 5.61
61 Sunzell fungicide 4.28
62 VV0129 fungicide 6.11
63 VV02089 fungicide 5.93
64 VV2852 fungicide 6.39
65 WW12885 fungicide 5.41
66 Yenda fungicide 4.58

Grain yield t/ha


Loading

Trial results Inverleigh site results

# Variety
Grain yield (t/ha)
1 Barham no fungicide 4.39
2 Beaufort no fungicide 5.32
3 Bolac no fungicide 4.61
4 Chara no fungicide 4.94
5 CS150.1 no fungicide 3.33
6 Derrimut no fungicide 4.95
7 Diamondbird no fungicide 4.21
8 EGA Gregory no fungicide 4.51
9 Ega Wedgetail no fungicide 4.56
10 Endure no fungicide 4
11 Espada no fungicide 4.84
12 Frelon no fungicide 4.06
13 Gascoigne no fungicide 4.36
14 HRZ3.0065 no fungicide 4.35
15 HRZ3.0069 no fungicide 4.02
16 HRZ3.0086 no fungicide 2.5
17 Hyperno no fungicide 4.25
18 Kellalac no fungicide 3.85
19 Lincoln no fungicide 4.06
20 LPB 04-0965 no fungicide 4.48
21 LR 03-0112 no fungicide 4.04
22 Mackellar no fungicide 3.71
23 Naparoo no fungicide 3.79
24 Preston no fungicide 4.66
25 RAC 1412 no fungicide 4.96
26 Sentinel no fungicide 4.04
27 SQP Revenue no fungicide 3.69
28 Sunzell no fungicide 3.63
29 VV0129 no fungicide 4.47
30 VV02089 no fungicide 4.72
31 VV2852 no fungicide 5
32 WW12885 no fungicide 3.99
33 Yenda no fungicide 3.99
34 Barham fungicide 4.27
35 Beaufort fungicide 5.01
36 Bolac fungicide 4.59
37 Chara fungicide 4.79
38 CS150.1 fungicide 3.81
39 Derrimut fungicide 5
40 Diamondbird fungicide 4.17
41 EGA Gregory fungicide 4.14
42 Ega Wedgetail fungicide 4.62
43 Endure fungicide 4.03
44 Espada fungicide 5.22
45 Frelon fungicide 3.95
46 Gascoigne fungicide 4.47
47 HRZ3.0065 fungicide 4.36
48 HRZ3.0069 fungicide 4.1
49 HRZ3.0086 fungicide 2.64
50 Hyperno fungicide 4.41
51 Kellalac fungicide 4.12
52 Lincoln fungicide 3.96
53 LPB 04-0965 fungicide 4.33
54 LR 03-0112 fungicide 3.81
55 Mackellar fungicide 3.78
56 Naparoo fungicide 3.92
57 Preston fungicide 4.66
58 RAC 1412 fungicide 4.63
59 Sentinel fungicide 3.92
60 SQP Revenue fungicide 3.6
61 Sunzell fungicide 3.79
62 VV0129 fungicide 5.19
63 VV02089 fungicide 4.57
64 VV2852 fungicide 4.82
65 WW12885 fungicide 4.36
66 Yenda fungicide 3.93

Grain yield t/ha


Loading
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Not specified
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Hamilton, VIC Not specified
Inverleigh, VIC Not specified
Mininera, VIC Not specified
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
Hamilton, VIC Kurosol
Inverleigh, VIC Sodosol
Mininera, VIC Sodosol
Soil Moisture Source: BOM/ANU
Average amount of water stored in the soil profile during the year, estimated by the OzWALD model-data fusion system.
Year Hamilton VIC Inverleigh VIC Mininera VIC
2009 566.8mm508.8mm266.5mm
2008 567.0mm492.1mm264.2mm
2007 570.5mm455.4mm302.8mm
2006 566.8mm467.8mm300.7mm
2005 569.1mm491.2mm316.0mm
2004 573.7mm438.6mm320.6mm
2003 578.0mm416.4mm373.9mm
2002 564.0mm399.6mm397.3mm
2001 559.7mm472.4mm407.9mm
2000 510.3mm448.5mm432.6mm
National soil grid Source: CSIRO/TERN
NOTE: National Soil Grid data is aggregated information for background information on the wider area
Actual soil values can vary significantly in a small area and the trial soil tests are the most relevant data where available

Soil properties

Loading

Climate

Derived climate information

No observed climate data available for this trial.
Derived climate data is determined from trial site location and national weather sources.

Hamilton VIC

Inverleigh VIC

Mininera VIC

Hamilton VIC

NOTE: Exact trial site locality unknown - Climate data may not be accurate
Loading
Loading
Loading

Inverleigh VIC

Loading
Loading
Loading

Mininera VIC

Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.

Trial report and links

2009 trial report

2009 trial report

2009 trial report



Trial last modified: 21-11-2019 11:56am AEST