Using PA to improve efficiency of soil amelioration

2011

Research organisaton
Funding sources

Trial details

Researcher(s) Nicole Dimos (SPAA), Rural Solutions SA, Cummins Ag Services, LEADA and Precision AgServices, Kieran Wauchope, Marty Chandler, Peter Treloar and Michael WellsKieran Wauchope (RSSA, LEADA)
Year(s) 2011
Contributor Society of Precision Agriculture Australia
Trial location(s) Site 4, Edillilie, SA
Using PA to improve efficiency of soil amelioration locations
Aims

To determine if precision ag tools can improve the efficiency of soil amelioration as well as assess the effectiveness of amelioration techniques • To compare delving, spading and gypsum to improve sodic and bleached soils

Key messages

A yield increase is apparent in figures 2 (circled) and 3 at the ripped only treatment in the eastern plot, however this is not seen in the western plots and does not stand out in graph 1. Results presented in Graph 1 generally show only slight differences with the greatest response observed in the gypsum only treatment on the eastern plots. This soil was highly sodic at 10cm and as could be expected the gypsum would make a quicker impact on sodicity, thus allowing for improved drainage that may have improved crop production. Gypsum would take longer to impact on subsoil sodicity and may show a response after several years of data are collected

Lead research organisation Society of Precision Agriculture Australia
Host research organisation N/A
Trial funding source GRDC SPA000010
Trial funding source SPAA
Related program N/A
Acknowledgments

This project was funded by the Grains Research and Development Corporation (GRDC) and Caring for Our Country and State NRM Community Grants


Other trial partners Peter and Brett Mickan (Property owner)
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop type Wheat
Treatment type(s)
  • Soil amelioration: Type
Trial type Demonstration
Trial design Unknown

Edillilie 2011

Sow rate or Target density 100 kg/ha
Sow date 10 March 2011 10 March 2011
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified
Fertiliser

140 kg/ha Urea

Soil amelioration

Gypsum at 2.5 t/ha, disced and spading with gypsum at 2.5t/ha, ripping plus gypsum at 2.5 t/ha, a control and ripping plus spading with gypsum at 2.5 t/ha.

Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information

Download results

Trial results Table 1

# Treatment 1
Treatment 2
Electrical conductivity (dS/m)
1 South P1 site 0-10 cm depth 0.12
2 South P1 site 10-30 cm depth 0.04
3 South P1 site 30-70 cm depth 0.32
4 South P1 site 70-90 cm depth 0.48
5 South Y1 site 0-10 cm depth 0.08
6 South Y1 site 10-30 cm depth 0.04
7 South Y1 site 30-70 cm depth 0.05
8 South Y1 site 70-90 cm depth 0.05
9 South G1 site 0-10 cm depth 0.05
10 South G1 site 10-30 cm depth 0.04
11 South G1 site 30-70 cm depth 0.16
12 South G1 site 70-90 cm depth 0.28

Electrical conductivity dS/m


Loading
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Not specified
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Site 4, Edillilie, SA Not specified
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source
Trial site Soil order
Site 4, Edillilie, SA Sodosol
National soil grid Source
NOTE: National Soil Grid data is aggregated information for background information on the wider area
Actual soil values can vary significantly in a small area and the trial soil tests are the most relevant data where available

Soil properties

Loading

Climate

Derived climate information

No observed climate data available for this trial.
Derived climate data is determined from trial site location and national weather sources.

Site 4, Edillilie SA

Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.




CC BY
Individual Trial Project data and information and OFT metadata are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The data and information accessed through OFT may also be subject to Terms of Use specified by the Trial Contributor,
in which case the Terms of Use of a Trial Contributor take precedence over other information provided on OFT.
Trial last modified: 13-09-2017 12:14pm AEST