Is there a preferred barley variety to grow in a P deficient soil?

2014
CC BY 4.0

Research organisatons
Funding source

Trial details

Researcher(s) Bill Bovill (CSIRO)
Sean Mason (UoA)
Glenn McDonald (UoA)
Willie Shoobridge (CSIRO)
Rob Wheeler (SARDI)
Year(s) 2014
Contributor Hart Field Site Group
Trial location(s) Condowie, SA
Is there a preferred barley variety to grow in a P deficient soil? locations
Aims

To investigate responses to phosphorus (P) fertiliser of common wheat and barley varieties on a P deficient soil

Key messages

At low available soil P and moderate PBI levels relatively high P inputs are required to maximise yields. Replacement P programs should incorporate a measure of PBI in order to effectively balance available P across different soil types. Significant yield differences between varieties of wheat and barley could not be attributed to varying P uptake efficiencies

Lead research organisation University of Adelaide
Host research organisation Hart Field Site Group
Trial funding source SAGIT UA1201
Related program N/A
Acknowledgments

The experiments were run with the financial support of SAGIT (project code – UA1201). The trial was managed by Rob Wheeler and the expertise of his team is acknowledged


Other trial partners Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop types Cereal (Grain): Barley Cereal (Grain): Wheat
Treatment type(s)
  • Crop: Variety
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Replicated

Condowie 2014 Barley

Sow date 3 June 2014 3 June 2014
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size 1.75m x 10m
Plot replication 3
Fertiliser

Seeding: 60kg/ha DAP, additonal inputs in season as specified in treatments

Condowie 2014 Wheat

Sow date Not specified
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified
Fertiliser Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information

Download results

Trial results Table 1

@T1: July 30 @T2: Aug 14 @T3: Aug 25
# Variety
Treatment 1
Grain yield (t/ha) Dry matter biomass (t DM/ha) Dry matter biomass (t DM/ha) Dry matter biomass (t DM/ha)
1 Barque 0 kg P/ha 2.34 0.41 0.92 1.62
1 Barque 5 kg P/ha 2.53 0.43 1.19 2.06
1 Barque 10 kg P/ha 2.49 0.45 1.13 2.01
1 Barque 25 kg P/ha 2.73 0.62 1.49 2.36
2 Barque 40 kg P/ha 2.86 0.67 1.37 2.16
2 Barque 0 kg P/ha 2.53 0.44 0.82 1.38
2 Barque 5 kg P/ha 2.49 0.4 1.03 1.62
2 Barque 10 kg P/ha 2.52 0.4 1.09 1.65
3 Barque 25 kg P/ha 2.55 0.41 1.01 1.52
3 Barque 40 kg P/ha 2.86 0.6 1.52 2.28
3 Barque 0 kg P/ha 2.54 0.32 0.82 1.25
3 Barque 5 kg P/ha 2.51 0.37 0.94 1.57
4 Barque 10 kg P/ha 2.51 0.46 0.83 1.3
4 Barque 25 kg P/ha 2.54 0.5 1.08 1.58
4 Barque 40 kg P/ha 2.76 0.56 1.2 1.81
4 Barque 0 kg P/ha 2.24 0.45 0.8 1.42
5 Barque 5 kg P/ha 2.24 0.42 0.89 1.5
5 Barque 10 kg P/ha 2.42 0.48 0.99 1.7
5 Barque 25 kg P/ha 2.56 0.6 1.65 2.37
5 Barque 40 kg P/ha 2.85 0.83 2.04 3.02
6 Commander 0 kg P/ha 2.28 0.22 0.31 0.61
6 Commander 5 kg P/ha 2.32 0.21 0.62 1
6 Commander 10 kg P/ha 2.42 0.27 0.35 0.73
6 Commander 25 kg P/ha 2.65 0.23 0.61 1
7 Commander 40 kg P/ha 2.82 0.28 0.69 1.14
7 Commander 0 kg P/ha 2.07 0.32 0.68 1.3
7 Commander 5 kg P/ha 2.21 0.35 0.71 1.43
7 Commander 10 kg P/ha 2.15 0.36 0.93 1.72
8 Commander 25 kg P/ha 2.39 0.45 0.96 1.83
8 Commander 40 kg P/ha 2.61 0.64 1.53 2.65
8 Commander
8 Commander
9 Commander
9 Commander
9 Commander
9 Commander
10 Commander
10 Commander
10 Commander
10 Commander
11 Fleet
11 Fleet
11 Fleet
11 Fleet
12 Fleet
12 Fleet
12 Fleet
12 Fleet
13 Fleet
13 Fleet
13 Fleet
13 Fleet
14 Fleet
14 Fleet
14 Fleet
14 Fleet
15 Fleet
15 Fleet
15 Fleet
15 Fleet
16 Galleon
16 Galleon
16 Galleon
16 Galleon
17 Galleon
17 Galleon
17 Galleon
17 Galleon
18 Galleon
18 Galleon
18 Galleon
18 Galleon
19 Galleon
19 Galleon
19 Galleon
19 Galleon
20 Galleon
20 Galleon
20 Galleon
20 Galleon
21 Hindmarsh
21 Hindmarsh
21 Hindmarsh
21 Hindmarsh
22 Hindmarsh
22 Hindmarsh
22 Hindmarsh
22 Hindmarsh
23 Hindmarsh
23 Hindmarsh
23 Hindmarsh
23 Hindmarsh
24 Hindmarsh
24 Hindmarsh
24 Hindmarsh
24 Hindmarsh
25 Hindmarsh
25 Hindmarsh
25 Hindmarsh
25 Hindmarsh
26 Yarra
26 Yarra
26 Yarra
26 Yarra
27 Yarra
27 Yarra
27 Yarra
27 Yarra
28 Yarra
28 Yarra
28 Yarra
28 Yarra
29 Yarra
29 Yarra
29 Yarra
29 Yarra
30 Yarra
30 Yarra
30 Yarra
30 Yarra

Grain yield t/ha


Loading

Dry matter biomass t DM/ha


Loading
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Not specified
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Condowie, SA Calcarosol
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
Condowie, SA Chromosol
Soil Moisture Source: BOM/ANU
Average amount of water stored in the soil profile during the year, estimated by the OzWALD model-data fusion system.
Year Condowie SA
2014 603.3mm
2013 614.4mm
2012 612.7mm
2011 630.5mm
2010 636.9mm
2009 618.0mm
2008 594.6mm
2007 614.2mm
2006 611.0mm
2005 621.2mm
2004 579.3mm
2003 608.1mm
2002 575.0mm
2001 613.4mm
2000 600.5mm
National soil grid Source: CSIRO/TERN
NOTE: National Soil Grid data is aggregated information for background information on the wider area
Actual soil values can vary significantly in a small area and the trial soil tests are the most relevant data where available

Soil properties

Loading

Climate

Condowie SA 2014


Observed climate information

Rainfall trial gsr (mm) 280mm

Derived climate information

Condowie SA

NOTE: Exact trial site locality unknown - Climate data may not be accurate
Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.

Trial report and links

2014 trial report



Trial last modified: 09-12-2019 19:13pm AEST