Comparison of barley varieties

2013
CC BY 4.0

Research organisaton
Funding source

Trial details

Researcher(s) Peter Hooper (Hart Field Site Group)
Sarah Noack (Hart Field Site Group)
Year(s) 2013
Contributor Hart Field Site Group
Trial location(s) Hart, SA
Comparison of barley varieties locations
Aims

To compare the performance of new barley varieties and lines against the current industry standards

Key messages

Hindmarsh and Fathom were the highest yielding feed varieties at 5.5 t/ha. Unclassified lines (currently undergoing malt accreditation) La Trobe (IGB1101) and Compass (WI4593) also yielded 5.5 t/ha. Commander and GrangeR were the highest yielding malt varieties yielding 5.3 t/ha and 5.1 t/ha, respectively. Buloke, Scope and Charger (CA412402) were the only malt varieties not to meet the minimum retention rate

Lead research organisation Hart Field Site Group
Host research organisation Hart Field Site Group
Trial funding source HFSG members
Related program N/A
Acknowledgments N/A
Other trial partners Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop type Cereal (Grain): Barley
Treatment type(s)
  • Crop: Variety
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Randomised,Replicated,Blocked

Hart 2013

Sow date 18 May 2013 18 May 2013
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size 1.4m x 10m
Plot replication 3
Fertiliser

Seeding: 60kg/ha DAP 2% Zn, 11/7/13: 75L/ha UAN

Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information

Download results

Trial results Table 1

# Variety
Protein (%) Test weight (kg/hL) Grain yield (t/ha) Screenings (<2.2mm sieve) (%)
1 Fathom 11.2 63.9 5.5 7.4
2 Fleet 11.3 63.5 5.2 6.9
3 Hindmarsh 10.4 69.4 5.52 13.4
4 Keel 10.8 67.8 5.39 7.7
5 Maritime 11.6 63.5 4.52 7.3
6 Oxford 10.2 66.8 5.08 14
7 Buloke 11.2 66.2 4.8 13.9
8 Commander 10.9 67.1 5.25 11.5
9 Flagship 10.8 68.2 4.56 11.5
10 Flinders 12 67.2 4.71 7.4
11 Schooner 10.5 67.9 4.5 10.3
12 Scope 11.3 65.9 4.78 12.6
13 Westminster 11.3 67.6 4.75 5.7
14 Bass 12 66.2 5.04 4.5
15 Navigator 11 64.1 5.01 12.6
16 GrangeR 11.2 66.6 5.05 12.1
17 Charger 11.5 63.3 4.98 26.8
18 La Trobe 10.8 68 5.48 21.8
19 Skipper 11.3 68.3 5.26 11.3
20 Wimmera 11.7 66 4.88 14.1
21 Compass 10.7 65.6 5.48 6.8

Grain yield t/ha


Loading

Protein %


Loading

Screenings (<2.2mm sieve) %


Loading

Test weight kg/hL


Loading
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Not specified
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Hart, SA Calcarosol
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
Hart, SA Chromosol
Soil Moisture Source: BOM/ANU
Average amount of water stored in the soil profile during the year, estimated by the OzWALD model-data fusion system.
Year Hart SA
2013 622.8mm
2012 654.6mm
2011 683.8mm
2010 686.7mm
2009 669.9mm
2008 633.9mm
2007 649.9mm
2006 651.2mm
2005 675.4mm
2004 633.0mm
2003 652.2mm
2002 649.4mm
2001 674.5mm
2000 625.6mm
National soil grid Source: CSIRO/TERN
NOTE: National Soil Grid data is aggregated information for background information on the wider area
Actual soil values can vary significantly in a small area and the trial soil tests are the most relevant data where available

Soil properties

Loading

Climate

Hart SA 2013


Observed climate information

Rainfall trial gsr (mm) 303mm

Derived climate information

Hart SA

Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.

Trial report and links

2013 trial report



Trial last modified: 06-06-2019 14:26pm AEST