In 2011, nine different break options were established and compared against continuous wheat. In 2012, a second break phase was implemented (2 year break) or the rotation was returned to wheat (1 year break). In 2013, all rotations were returned to either conventional wheat (var. Shield) or Clearfield wheat (var. Grenade) which was placed on rotations where brome grass had built to concerning levels. Treatments in 2013 were also sown at two different times depending on the grass weed risk. Treatments had different levels of nitrogen applied throughout the growing season depending on rotational history and yield potential. Throughout the trial, agronomic factors including soil nitrogen, soil disease, plant available water and weeds have been intensively monitored.

In 2011, nine different break options were established and compared against continuous wheat. In 2012, a second break phase was implemented (2 year break) or the rotation was returned to wheat (1 year break). In 2013, all rotations were returned to either conventional wheat (var. Shield) or Clearfield wheat (var. Grenade) which was placed on rotations where brome grass had built to concerning levels. Treatments in 2013 were also sown at two different times depending on the grass weed risk. Treatments had different levels of nitrogen applied throughout the growing season depending on rotational history and yield potential. Throughout the trial, agronomic factors including soil nitrogen, soil disease, plant available water and weeds have been intensively monitored.

In 2011, nine different break options were established and compared against continuous wheat. In 2012, a second break phase was implemented (2 year break) or the rotation was returned to wheat (1 year break). In 2013, all rotations were returned to either conventional wheat (var. Shield) or Clearfield wheat (var. Grenade) which was placed on rotations where brome grass had built to concerning levels. Treatments in 2013 were also sown at two different times depending on the grass weed risk. Treatments had different levels of nitrogen applied throughout the growing season depending on rotational history and yield potential. Throughout the trial, agronomic factors including soil nitrogen, soil disease, plant available water and weeds have been intensively monitored.

In 2011, nine different break options were established and compared against continuous wheat. In 2012, a second break phase was implemented (2 year break) or the rotation was returned to wheat (1 year break). In 2013, all rotations were returned to either conventional wheat (var. Shield) or Clearfield wheat (var. Grenade) which was placed on rotations where brome grass had built to concerning levels. Treatments in 2013 were also sown at two different times depending on the grass weed risk. Treatments had different levels of nitrogen applied throughout the growing season depending on rotational history and yield potential. Throughout the trial, agronomic factors including soil nitrogen, soil disease, plant available water and weeds have been intensively monitored.

In 2011, nine different break options were established and compared against continuous wheat. In 2012, a second break phase was implemented (2 year break) or the rotation was returned to wheat (1 year break). In 2013, all rotations were returned to either conventional wheat (var. Shield) or Clearfield wheat (var. Grenade) which was placed on rotations where brome grass had built to concerning levels. Treatments in 2013 were also sown at two different times depending on the grass weed risk. Treatments had different levels of nitrogen applied throughout the growing season depending on rotational history and yield potential. Throughout the trial, agronomic factors including soil nitrogen, soil disease, plant available water and weeds have been intensively monitored.

In 2011, nine different break options were established and compared against continuous wheat. In 2012, a second break phase was implemented (2 year break) or the rotation was returned to wheat (1 year break). In 2013, all rotations were returned to either conventional wheat (var. Shield) or Clearfield wheat (var. Grenade) which was placed on rotations where brome grass had built to concerning levels. Treatments in 2013 were also sown at two different times depending on the grass weed risk. Treatments had different levels of nitrogen applied throughout the growing season depending on rotational history and yield potential. Throughout the trial, agronomic factors including soil nitrogen, soil disease, plant available water and weeds have been intensively monitored.

In 2011, nine different break options were established and compared against continuous wheat. In 2012, a second break phase was implemented (2 year break) or the rotation was returned to wheat (1 year break). In 2013, all rotations were returned to either conventional wheat (var. Shield) or Clearfield wheat (var. Grenade) which was placed on rotations where brome grass had built to concerning levels. Treatments in 2013 were also sown at two different times depending on the grass weed risk. Treatments had different levels of nitrogen applied throughout the growing season depending on rotational history and yield potential. Throughout the trial, agronomic factors including soil nitrogen, soil disease, plant available water and weeds have been intensively monitored.

In 2011, nine different break options were established and compared against continuous wheat. In 2012, a second break phase was implemented (2 year break) or the rotation was returned to wheat (1 year break). In 2013, all rotations were returned to either conventional wheat (var. Shield) or Clearfield wheat (var. Grenade) which was placed on rotations where brome grass had built to concerning levels. Treatments in 2013 were also sown at two different times depending on the grass weed risk. Treatments had different levels of nitrogen applied throughout the growing season depending on rotational history and yield potential. Throughout the trial, agronomic factors including soil nitrogen, soil disease, plant available water and weeds have been intensively monitored.

In 2011, nine different break options were established and compared against continuous wheat. In 2012, a second break phase was implemented (2 year break) or the rotation was returned to wheat (1 year break). In 2013, all rotations were returned to either conventional wheat (var. Shield) or Clearfield wheat (var. Grenade) which was placed on rotations where brome grass had built to concerning levels. Treatments in 2013 were also sown at two different times depending on the grass weed risk. Treatments had different levels of nitrogen applied throughout the growing season depending on rotational history and yield potential. Throughout the trial, agronomic factors including soil nitrogen, soil disease, plant available water and weeds have been intensively monitored.

In 2011, nine different break options were established and compared against continuous wheat. In 2012, a second break phase was implemented (2 year break) or the rotation was returned to wheat (1 year break). In 2013, all rotations were returned to either conventional wheat (var. Shield) or Clearfield wheat (var. Grenade) which was placed on rotations where brome grass had built to concerning levels. Treatments in 2013 were also sown at two different times depending on the grass weed risk. Treatments had different levels of nitrogen applied throughout the growing season depending on rotational history and yield potential. Throughout the trial, agronomic factors including soil nitrogen, soil disease, plant available water and weeds have been intensively monitored.

In 2011, nine different break options were established and compared against continuous wheat. In 2012, a second break phase was implemented (2 year break) or the rotation was returned to wheat (1 year break). In 2013, all rotations were returned to either conventional wheat (var. Shield) or Clearfield wheat (var. Grenade) which was placed on rotations where brome grass had built to concerning levels. Treatments in 2013 were also sown at two different times depending on the grass weed risk. Treatments had different levels of nitrogen applied throughout the growing season depending on rotational history and yield potential. Throughout the trial, agronomic factors including soil nitrogen, soil disease, plant available water and weeds have been intensively monitored.

In 2011, nine different break options were established and compared against continuous wheat. In 2012, a second break phase was implemented (2 year break) or the rotation was returned to wheat (1 year break). In 2013, all rotations were returned to either conventional wheat (var. Shield) or Clearfield wheat (var. Grenade) which was placed on rotations where brome grass had built to concerning levels. Treatments in 2013 were also sown at two different times depending on the grass weed risk. Treatments had different levels of nitrogen applied throughout the growing season depending on rotational history and yield potential. Throughout the trial, agronomic factors including soil nitrogen, soil disease, plant available water and weeds have been intensively monitored.

In 2011, nine different break options were established and compared against continuous wheat. In 2012, a second break phase was implemented (2 year break) or the rotation was returned to wheat (1 year break). In 2013, all rotations were returned to either conventional wheat (var. Shield) or Clearfield wheat (var. Grenade) which was placed on rotations where brome grass had built to concerning levels. Treatments in 2013 were also sown at two different times depending on the grass weed risk. Treatments had different levels of nitrogen applied throughout the growing season depending on rotational history and yield potential. Throughout the trial, agronomic factors including soil nitrogen, soil disease, plant available water and weeds have been intensively monitored.

In 2011, nine different break options were established and compared against continuous wheat. In 2012, a second break phase was implemented (2 year break) or the rotation was returned to wheat (1 year break). In 2013, all rotations were returned to either conventional wheat (var. Shield) or Clearfield wheat (var. Grenade) which was placed on rotations where brome grass had built to concerning levels. Treatments in 2013 were also sown at two different times depending on the grass weed risk. Treatments had different levels of nitrogen applied throughout the growing season depending on rotational history and yield potential. Throughout the trial, agronomic factors including soil nitrogen, soil disease, plant available water and weeds have been intensively monitored.

In 2011, nine different break options were established and compared against continuous wheat. In 2012, a second break phase was implemented (2 year break) or the rotation was returned to wheat (1 year break). In 2013, all rotations were returned to either conventional wheat (var. Shield) or Clearfield wheat (var. Grenade) which was placed on rotations where brome grass had built to concerning levels. Treatments in 2013 were also sown at two different times depending on the grass weed risk. Treatments had different levels of nitrogen applied throughout the growing season depending on rotational history and yield potential. Throughout the trial, agronomic factors including soil nitrogen, soil disease, plant available water and weeds have been intensively monitored.

In 2011, nine different break options were established and compared against continuous wheat. In 2012, a second break phase was implemented (2 year break) or the rotation was returned to wheat (1 year break). In 2013, all rotations were returned to either conventional wheat (var. Shield) or Clearfield wheat (var. Grenade) which was placed on rotations where brome grass had built to concerning levels. Treatments in 2013 were also sown at two different times depending on the grass weed risk. Treatments had different levels of nitrogen applied throughout the growing season depending on rotational history and yield potential. Throughout the trial, agronomic factors including soil nitrogen, soil disease, plant available water and weeds have been intensively monitored.

In 2011, nine different break options were established and compared against continuous wheat. In 2012, a second break phase was implemented (2 year break) or the rotation was returned to wheat (1 year break). In 2013, all rotations were returned to either conventional wheat (var. Shield) or Clearfield wheat (var. Grenade) which was placed on rotations where brome grass had built to concerning levels. Treatments in 2013 were also sown at two different times depending on the grass weed risk. Treatments had different levels of nitrogen applied throughout the growing season depending on rotational history and yield potential. Throughout the trial, agronomic factors including soil nitrogen, soil disease, plant available water and weeds have been intensively monitored.

In 2011, nine different break options were established and compared against continuous wheat. In 2012, a second break phase was implemented (2 year break) or the rotation was returned to wheat (1 year break). In 2013, all rotations were returned to either conventional wheat (var. Shield) or Clearfield wheat (var. Grenade) which was placed on rotations where brome grass had built to concerning levels. Treatments in 2013 were also sown at two different times depending on the grass weed risk. Treatments had different levels of nitrogen applied throughout the growing season depending on rotational history and yield potential. Throughout the trial, agronomic factors including soil nitrogen, soil disease, plant available water and weeds have been intensively monitored.

In 2011, nine different break options were established and compared against continuous wheat. In 2012, a second break phase was implemented (2 year break) or the rotation was returned to wheat (1 year break). In 2013, all rotations were returned to either conventional wheat (var. Shield) or Clearfield wheat (var. Grenade) which was placed on rotations where brome grass had built to concerning levels. Treatments in 2013 were also sown at two different times depending on the grass weed risk. Treatments had different levels of nitrogen applied throughout the growing season depending on rotational history and yield potential. Throughout the trial, agronomic factors including soil nitrogen, soil disease, plant available water and weeds have been intensively monitored.

In 2011, nine different break options were established and compared against continuous wheat. In 2012, a second break phase was implemented (2 year break) or the rotation was returned to wheat (1 year break). In 2013, all rotations were returned to either conventional wheat (var. Shield) or Clearfield wheat (var. Grenade) which was placed on rotations where brome grass had built to concerning levels. Treatments in 2013 were also sown at two different times depending on the grass weed risk. Treatments had different levels of nitrogen applied throughout the growing season depending on rotational history and yield potential. Throughout the trial, agronomic factors including soil nitrogen, soil disease, plant available water and weeds have been intensively monitored.

In 2011, nine different break options were established and compared against continuous wheat. In 2012, a second break phase was implemented (2 year break) or the rotation was returned to wheat (1 year break). In 2013, all rotations were returned to either conventional wheat (var. Shield) or Clearfield wheat (var. Grenade) which was placed on rotations where brome grass had built to concerning levels. Treatments in 2013 were also sown at two different times depending on the grass weed risk. Treatments had different levels of nitrogen applied throughout the growing season depending on rotational history and yield potential. Throughout the trial, agronomic factors including soil nitrogen, soil disease, plant available water and weeds have been intensively monitored.