Comparison of tillage methods for lime incorporation


Research organisaton
Funding source

Trial details

Researcher(s) Wayne Parker
Year(s) 2014
Contributor Northern Agri Group
Trial location(s) West Binnu, WA
Comparison of tillage methods for lime incorporation locations

Using tillage to incorporate lime improves the rates of reaction and increases subsurface pH soomer than spreading lime on the surface alone.

Key messages

Plant emergence was greatest in the offest disc treatment and lowest in the mouldboard plough treatments. Depth of sowing is critical and difficult to control on soil ameliorated soils.

Lead research organisation N/A
Host research organisation N/A
Trial funding source Caring for our Country INNOV 292
Related program N/A
Acknowledgments N/A
Other trial partners Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional trial information


Crop type Cereal: Wheat
Treatment type(s)
  • Soil amelioration: Rate
  • Soil amelioration: Application
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Replicated
Sow rate or Target density Not specified
Sowing machinery Not specified
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication 3
Plot blocking Not specified
Plot randomisation Not specified
Paddock history 2013 Canola
Fertiliser Not specified
Herbicide Not specified
Insecticide Not specified
Fungicide Not specified
Pesticide Not specified
Soil amelioration Not specified
Seed treatment Not specified
Inoculant Not specified
Tillage Not specified
Other trial notes

All treatments suffered yeild loss through the hot dry perriods of July and August irrespective of plant density.

Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information

Trial results Table 1

# Treatment 1
Treatment 2
Grain yield (t/ha) Protein (%)
1 2 t/ha lime No incorporation 0.96 14.1
2 4.5 t/ha lime No incorporation 0.93 14.9
3 0 t/ha lime Offset disc 0.95 15.4
4 2 t/ha lime Offset disc 1.1 14.2
5 4.5 t/ha lime Offset disc 1.05 14
6 0 t/ha lime One way plough 0.78 15.2
7 2 t/ha lime One way plough 0.91 14.5
8 4.5 t/ha lime One way plough 0.87 14.4
9 0 t/ha lime Mouldboard plough 0.69 16.5
10 2 t/ha lime Mouldboard plough 0.73 16.6
11 4.5 t/ha lime Mouldboard plough 0.65 16.1
12 0 t/ha lime Deep rip 0.97 14.6
13 2 t/ha lime Deep rip 0.88 14.9
14 4.5 t/ha lime Deep rip 0.87 14.6
15 0 t/ha lime Grizzly Deep Digger 0.99 14.2
16 2 t/ha lime Grizzly Deep Digger 1.01 15.1
17 4.5 t/ha lime Grizzly Deep Digger 1.21 13.9
18 0 t/ha lime No incorporation 0.94 14.6

Grain yield t/ha


Protein %

Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Not specified
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
West Binnu, WA Yellow sandplain
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source
Trial site Soil order
West Binnu, WA Tenosol
National soil grid Source
NOTE: National Soil Grid data is aggregated information for background information on the wider area
Actual soil values can vary significantly in a small area and the trial soil tests are the most relevant data where available

Soil properties



West Binnu WA 2014

Derived climate information
NOTE: Exact trial site locality unknown - Climate data may not be accurate
BOM Data source BALLINE [762] 20km proximity to trial site location


Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.