Best bet management of nutrition on ameliorated non-wetting soils in the Geraldton Port Zone - Eneabba


Research organisatons
Funding source

Trial details

Researcher(s) Alana Hartley, Liebe Group
Year(s) 2017
Contributor Liebe Group
Trial location(s) Eneabba, WA
Best bet management of nutrition on ameliorated non-wetting soils in the Geraldton Port Zone - Eneabba locations

To determine the most effective way to apply nutrients (granular, banded, top dressed or liquid) on non-wetting soils after amelioration, in the Geraldton Port Zone.

Key messages
  • This site was unresponsive to nutrient treatments in 2017
  • Treatments were adjusted to reflect grower standard practice due to drier than normal conditions at the beginning of winter.


Lead research organisation Liebe Group
Host research organisation Grains Research and Development Corporation
Trial funding source GRDC LIE00010-A
Related program N/A

Thank you to the Broun family for hosting this site at their Eneabba property. The Liebe Group would also like to acknowledge the project team, including Stephen Davies (DPIRD) and James Easton (CSBP) who helped design this trial. Thanks are also extended to the field team at DPIRD Geraldton, for implementation, management and harvesting of this trial.

This project has been funded by the GRDC LIE00010-A Best bet management for ameliorated non-wetting soils of the Geraldton Port Zone.

Other trial partners Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional trial information


Crop type Wheat
Treatment type(s)
  • Fertiliser: Application
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Replicated

Eneabba 2017

Sow rate or Target density 70 kg/ha
Sow date 23 May 2017 23rd May 2017
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size 1.54m x 20m
Plot replication 4

See attached trial report


23/05/2017: 1 L/ha Sprayseed, 1.5 L/ha Treflan, 118 g/ha Sakura

13/07/2017: 800 ml/ha Velocity + 1 % Hasten


15/08/2017: 300 ml/ha Prosaro

Soil amelioration

2015: Rotary Spaded

Other trial notes

For further information, contact Alana Hartley, Liebe Group
08 9661 0570

Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information

Trial results Table 1

# Variety
Protein (%) Grain yield (t/ha) Screenings (%) Hectolitre (g/hL)
1 Std N no K 12 2.16 8.04 76.19
2 Std N std K 12.3 2.22 8.07 75.78
3 Liquid K 12.2 2.04 8.52 76.07
4 Std N High K 12.3 2.2 8.43 75.97
5 Low N High K 11.5 1.83 7.44 78.27
6 Std N High K 11.8 2.23 7.88 77.52
7 Std N High K 12 2.28 7.01 77.3
8 Std N no K 11.9 2.19 7.81 76.68
9 Std N Very High K 12 2.4 6.65 76.1

Grain yield t/ha


Hectolitre g/hL


Protein %


Screenings %

Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Site Depth Type pH EC P K N A OC CAT
Eneabba, WA 0 - 10cm 6.00 0.09 0.57
Eneabba, WA 10 - 20cm 6.00 0.04 0.66
Eneabba, WA 20 - 30cm 5.80 0.03 0.48
Eneabba, WA 30 - 40cm 5.00 0.02
Eneabba, WA 40 - 50cm 4.80 0.02
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Eneabba, WA Sand over gravel
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source
Trial site Soil order
Eneabba, WA Chromosol
National soil grid Source
NOTE: National Soil Grid data is aggregated information for background information on the wider area
Actual soil values can vary significantly in a small area and the trial soil tests are the most relevant data where available

Soil properties



Eneabba WA 2017

Observed climate information

Rainfall avg gsr (mm) 265mm

Derived climate information

Eneabba WA


Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.