Selecting a wheat and barley variety for phosphorus efficiency or yield potential – which one is the winner?

2016
CC BY 4.0

Research organisatons

Trial details

Researcher(s) N/A
Year(s) 2016
Contributor Hart Field Site Group
Trial location(s) , SA
Selecting a wheat and barley variety for phosphorus efficiency or yield potential – which one is the winner? locations
Aims
  • To Identify sites and to assess under which circumstances (yield potential, fertiliser prices) high rates of P are economical.

  • To identify varieties that have greater PUE in P deficient soils.

    .
Key messages
  • Higher P rates (more than typical replacement P rates) were required on sites with moderate to high PBI values.
  • There were no significant trends in P use efficiency between wheat and barley varieties selected.
  • Variety choice should be made on yield potential and not any potential savings from growing a P efficient variety.
Lead research organisation School of Agriculture, Food and Wine - The University of Adelaide
Host research organisation N/A
Related program N/A
Acknowledgments N/A
Other trial partners Not specified

Method

Crop type Cereal (Grain): Wheat
Trial type
Trial design

2016

Sow date Not specified
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified
Other trial notes

While all due care has been taken in compiling the information within this manual the Hart Field-Site Group Inc or researchers involved take no liability resulting from the interpretation or use of these results. We do not endorse or recommend the products of any manufacturers referred to. Other products may perform as well or better than those specifically referred to. Any research with un-registered products and rates in the manual does not constitute a recommendation for that particular use by the researchers or the Hart Field-Site Group Inc.

Trial source data and summary not available
Check the trial report PDF for trial results.
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Not specified
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
, SA Not specified
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
, SA Sodosol
Soil Moisture Source: BOM/ANU
Average amount of water stored in the soil profile during the year, estimated by the OzWALD model-data fusion system.
Year SA
2016 205.0mm
2015 192.7mm
2014 239.3mm
2013 230.2mm
2012 227.9mm
2011 265.8mm
2010 273.6mm
2009 216.5mm
2008 215.5mm
2007 243.9mm
2006 246.7mm
2005 230.5mm
2004 226.1mm
2003 246.3mm
2002 224.1mm
2001 266.0mm
2000 304.4mm
National soil grid Source: CSIRO/TERN
NOTE: National Soil Grid data is aggregated information for background information on the wider area
Actual soil values can vary significantly in a small area and the trial soil tests are the most relevant data where available

Soil properties

Loading

Climate

Derived climate information

No observed climate data available for this trial.
Derived climate data is determined from trial site location and national weather sources.

SA

Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.

Trial report and links


No trial reports or attachments found


Trial last modified: 06-08-2019 07:54am AEST