Impact of retaining stubble in low rainfall farming systems

2017

Research organisatons
Funding source

Trial details

Researcher(s) Amanda Cook and Ian Richter (SARDI Minnipa)
Year(s) 2017
Contributor Eyre Peninsula Agricultural Research Foundation
Trial location(s) Site 23, Minnipa Agricultural Centre, SA
Related trials
Impact of retaining stubble in low rainfall farming systems locations
Aims

The GRDC project ‘Maintaining profitable farming systems with retained stubble - upper Eyre Peninsula’ aims to produce sustainable management guidelines to control pests, weeds and diseases while retaining stubble to maintain or improve soil health, and reduce exposure to wind erosion. The major outcome to be achieved is increased knowledge and skills allowing farmers and advisers to improve farm profitability while retaining stubble in farming systems on upper Eyre Peninsula (EP).

The Minnipa Agricultural Centre (MAC) S7 stubble retention trial was established to maintain or improve crop production through applying alternative weed, disease and pest control options in pasture wheat rotations in the presence of crop residues. The trial was established in 2013 with wheat and different stubble treatments imposed at harvest annually. It was sown either inter row or on row in 2014-17 to determine the impacts of stubble management on crop production, weeds, disease and pests in low rainfall farming systems.

Key messages

Standing stubble cut low (15-17 cm) resulted in the highest level of stubble being maintained into the following season.

Stubble management and seeding position had little effect on grass weeds.

Snail numbers were higher in standing stubble cut high (30 cm) and stubble removed had the lowest numbers.

Stubbles can be estimated using 1.3-2.8 times the grain yield, but it may underestimate the stubble in an average season following a good year, or after a very poor season.

In many low rainfall farming systems livestock are still a very important part of the farming system and the level of stubble carryover is reduced after grazing.

Stubble management and seeding position have not impacted greatly on crop production, weeds, disease and pests over three years with relatively high stubble loads for low rainfall farming systems.

Lead research organisation Eyre Peninsula Agricultural Research Foundation
Host research organisation SARDI Minnipa Agricultural Centre
Trial funding source GRDC EPF00001
Related program Maintaining profitable farming systems with retained stubble
Acknowledgments

Thank you to Ian Richter, Brett Hay, Rochelle Wheaton and Katrina Brands for processing samples. Trial funded by GRDC Maintaining profitable farming systems with retained stubble - upper Eyre Peninsula (EPF00001).


Other trial partners Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop type Barley
Treatment type(s)
  • Sowing: Method
  • Stubble: Management
  • Stubble: Height
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Replicated

Minnipa Agricultural Centre 2017

Sowing machinery

Plot size

Sow date 16 May 2017
Harvest date 8 November 2017
Plot size 18m x 2m
Plot replication 3
Fertiliser

base fertiliser of DAP @ 60 kg/ha treated with flutriafol.

In 2015-16 nitrogen treatments were added; Nil or 40 kg/ha urea at seeding and extra depending on seasonal conditions.

Fungicide

Flutriafol on seed

Seed treatment Flutriafol
Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information

Download results

Trial results Table 1

# Treatment 1
Ryegrass density (plants/m2) Grain yield (t/ha) Protein (%) Screenings (%) Dry matter (t/ha)
1 Stubble standing high 1.3 0.37 13.9 9 0.83
2 Stubble standing low 1.4 0.41 13.7 8.8 0.89
3 Stubble cultivated 1.1 0.42 14.1 8.9 0.93
4 Stubble removed 0.6 0.36 14.3 9 0.73
5 Inter row 1 0.39 14 9.3 0.87
6 On row 1.1 0.39 14 8.6 0.82
7 *No extra N 0.9 0.39 13.9 8.5 0.86
8 *60 kg/ha N 1.2 0.39 14.1 9.3 0.83

Grain yield t/ha


Loading

Dry matter t/ha


Loading

Protein %


Loading

Ryegrass density plants/m2


Loading

Screenings %


Loading
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Site Depth Type pH EC P K N A OC CAT
Site 23, Minnipa Agricultural Centre, SA 0 - 10cm 7.80 23.00 123.00
Site 23, Minnipa Agricultural Centre, SA 0 - 100cm 7.80 23.00 123.00
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Site 23, Minnipa Agricultural Centre, SA Red loam
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source
Trial site Soil order
Site 23, Minnipa Agricultural Centre, SA Calcarosol
National soil grid Source
NOTE: National Soil Grid data is aggregated information for background information on the wider area
Actual soil values can vary significantly in a small area and the trial soil tests are the most relevant data where available

Soil properties

Loading

Climate

Site 23, Minnipa Agricultural Centre SA 2017


Observed climate information

Rainfall avg ann (mm) 325mm
Rainfall avg gsr (mm) 242mm
Rainfall trial total (mm) 281mm
Rainfall trial gsr (mm) 155mm

Derived climate information

Site 23, Minnipa Agricultural Centre SA

Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.




CC BY
Individual Trial Project data and information and OFT metadata are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The data and information accessed through OFT may also be subject to Terms of Use specified by the Trial Contributor,
in which case the Terms of Use of a Trial Contributor take precedence over other information provided on OFT.
Trial last modified: 04-06-2019 13:35pm AEST