Chickpea, economically viable fungicide strategies to control Ascochyta blight in varieties and advanced lines, MRZ Lower North (Turretfield), South Australia

2019
CC BY 4.0

Research organisaton
Funding source

Trial details

Researcher(s) Jenny Davidson
Sarah Day
Penny Roberts
Year(s) 2019
Contributor Southern Pulse Agronomy
Trial location(s) Turretfield, SA
Chickpea, economically viable fungicide strategies to control Ascochyta blight in varieties and advanced  lines, MRZ Lower North (Turretfield), South Australia locations
Aims

To identify economically viable fungicide strategy to mitigate yield loss due to Ascochyta rabiei in varieties and advanced lines of chickpea.

Key messages

The trial faced numerous problems such as poor emergence in several lines, selective grazing by rabbits/hares and spray drift that confounded the fungicide applications. This trial was abandoned.

Lead research organisation Southern Pulse Agronomy
Host research organisation N/A
Trial funding source GRDC DAV00150
Related program N/A
Acknowledgments

The trial faced numerous problems such as poor emergence in several lines, selective grazing by rabbits/hares and spray drift that confounded the fungicide applications. This trial was abandoned.


Other trial partners Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop type Grain Legume: Chickpeas
Treatment type(s)
  • Fungicide: Timing
  • Fungicide: Type
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Randomised

Turretfield 2019

Sow date 19 June 2019
Harvest date Unknown
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified
Fertiliser

Please see treatment table in attached report.

Other trial notes

Varieties used in this trial: CICA1156, CICA1352, CIC1454, CICA1521, CICA1551, CICA1552, CICA1841, GENESIS090, Howzat, PBA Monarch, PBA Slasher, PBA Striker 

Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information
Trial source data and summary not available
Check the trial report PDF for trial results.
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Site Depth Type pH EC P K N A OC CAT
Turretfield, SA 0 - 10cm 7.50 0.15 44.00 889.00 20.00 2.00 2.01
Turretfield, SA 10 - 20cm 7.70 0.16 16.00 704.00 22.00 1.00 1.06
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Turretfield, SA Calcareous loamy earth
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
Turretfield, SA Chromosol
Soil Moisture Source: BOM/ANU
Average amount of water stored in the soil profile during the year, estimated by the OzWALD model-data fusion system.
Year Turretfield SA
2019 129.8mm
2018 183.1mm
2017 263.5mm
2016 234.0mm
2015 183.0mm
2014 215.8mm
2013 182.0mm
2012 204.1mm
2011 254.5mm
2010 224.3mm
2009 177.7mm
2008 149.6mm
2007 184.7mm
2006 211.3mm
2005 267.9mm
2004 226.1mm
2003 193.2mm
2002 181.4mm
2001 220.5mm
2000 201.8mm
National soil grid Source: CSIRO/TERN
NOTE: National Soil Grid data is aggregated information for background information on the wider area
Actual soil values can vary significantly in a small area and the trial soil tests are the most relevant data where available

Soil properties

Loading

Climate

Derived climate information

No observed climate data available for this trial.
Derived climate data is determined from trial site location and national weather sources.

Turretfield SA

NOTE: Exact trial site locality unknown - Climate data may not be accurate
Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.

Trial report and links

2019 trial report



Trial last modified: 14-03-2023 10:49am AEST