IWM, comparing harvest weed management practices with Sakura and Boxer Gold

2011
CC BY 4.0

Research organisaton

Trial details

Researcher(s) Nadine Hollamby (Liebe Group)
Rick Horbury (Bayer CropScience)
Michael Walsh (AHRI)
Year(s) 2011
Contributor Liebe Group
Trial location(s) Buntine, WA
IWM, comparing harvest weed management practices with Sakura and Boxer Gold locations
Aims

To evaluate the pre-emergent herbicide Sakura 850WG and Boxer Gold in combination with different IWM tools (chaff cart, Harrington seed desctructor, narrow windrow burning) during harvest on a broadacre scale.

Key messages
Not specified
Lead research organisation N/A
Host research organisation N/A
Related program N/A
Acknowledgments

Thank you to Bayer CropScience and Syngenta for donating chemical.


Other trial partners Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop type Cereal (Grain): Wheat
Treatment type(s)
  • Herbicide: Type
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Replicated

Buntine 2011

Sow date 1 June 2011
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size 20m x 11m
Plot replication 2
Fertiliser

1/6/11: 60 kg/ha K-Till Extra, 20 L/ha Flexi N, 19/8/11: 40 L/ha Flexi N

Herbicide

19/3/11: 0.6 L/ha PowerMax, 0.4 L/ha Ester 680, 0.1 L/ha Garlon, 31/5/11: 2 L/ha Glyphosate, pre-emergent as per treatment list, 4/7/11: 1 L/ha Jaguar, 26/7/11: 0.5 L/ha Precept

Fungicide

19/8/11: 50 mL/ha Emporer

Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information

Download results

Trial results Table 1

# Treatment 1
Screenings (%) Ryegrass density (plants/m2) Hectolitre weight (kg/hL) Protein (%) Grain yield (t/ha) Weed control grass (%)
1 Boxer Gold 2 77 8.3 2.9
2 Chaff cart 94.13 57.67
3 Control 221.5 0
4 HSD 72.63 67.5
5 Sakura 1 77 8.3 3
6 Windrow burn 73.58 66.79

Grain yield t/ha


Loading

Hectolitre weight kg/hL


Loading

Protein %


Loading

Ryegrass density plants/m2


Loading

Screenings %


Loading

Weed control grass %


Loading
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Site Depth Type pH EC P K N A OC CAT
Buntine, WA 0 - 10cm Sandy loam 5.60 0.08
Buntine, WA 10 - 30cm Sandy loam 4.80
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Buntine, WA Sandy loam
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
Buntine, WA Kandosol
Soil Moisture Source: BOM/ANU
Average amount of water stored in the soil profile during the year, estimated by the OzWALD model-data fusion system.
Year Buntine WA
2011 156.8mm
2010 119.4mm
2009 144.3mm
2008 187.8mm
2007 156.0mm
2006 163.2mm
2005 150.1mm
2004 141.2mm
2003 146.6mm
2002 102.7mm
2001 97.9mm
2000 171.9mm
National soil grid Source: CSIRO/TERN
NOTE: National Soil Grid data is aggregated information for background information on the wider area
Actual soil values can vary significantly in a small area and the trial soil tests are the most relevant data where available

Soil properties

Loading

Climate

Buntine WA 2011


Observed climate information

Rainfall trial gsr (mm) 293mm

Derived climate information

Buntine WA

Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.

Trial report and links

2011 trial report



Trial last modified: 11-09-2017 13:17pm AEST