Investigation of different nitrogen products

2006
CC BY 4.0

Research organisation
Funding source

Trial details

Researcher(s) Robert Christie (Incitec Pivot)
Peter Howie (UoM)
Rob Norton (UoM)
Charlie Walker (Incitec Pivot)
Year(s) 2006
Contributor Southern Farming Systems
Trial location(s) Inverleigh, VIC
Investigation of different nitrogen products locations
Aims

To investigate the benefits of specialty nitrogen products and liquid nitrogen options in cereals

Key messages

The data collected showed that even at the early stages of growth, there was no evidence of altered N uptake rates in the field experiments as a result of the amendments supplied with the urea.

Lead research organisation N/A
Host research organisation N/A
Trial funding source GRDC
Related program N/A
Acknowledgments N/A
Other trial partners Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop type Cereal (Grain): Wheat
Treatment type(s)
  • Fertiliser : Application Method
  • Fertiliser : Rate
  • Fertiliser : Type
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Replicated

Inverleigh 2006

Sow date 8 June 2006
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information

Download results

Trial results Table 1

# Variety
Treatment 1
Establishment plants (plants/m2) Protein (%) Grain yield (t/ha) Dry matter (t/ha)
1 Ruby Urea top dressed at GS31 40 kg N/ha NR 11.93 2.285 6.1297
2 Ruby Urea pre-spread 40 kg N/ha 127 12.5 2.246 6.298
3 Ruby Urea pre-drilled 40 kg N/ha 135 12.5 2.551 7.4398
4 Ruby urea mid-row banded 40 kg N/ha 137 11.06 2.572 7.728
5 Ruby Urea deep banded at sowing; 80 kg N/ha 113 13.2 1.765 7.2414
6 Ruby Urea deep banded at sowing; 40 kg N/ha 171 12.33 2.216 8.834
7 Ruby Urea deep banded at sowing; 20 kg N/ha 137 11.88 2.276 6.8989
8 Ruby Urea deep banded at sowing; 160 kg N/ha 72 13.46 0.894 6.0636
9 Ruby Urea and sowing and GS31 20+20 kg N/ha 132 12.12 2.564 7.4277
10 Ruby Urea + zeolite top dressed @ GS31 40 kg N/ha NR 11.54 2.351 7.4818
11 Ruby Urea + zeolite deep banded at sowing; 40 kg N/ha 123 12.54 2.28 7.9806
12 Ruby Polycoat Urea (ESN) top dressed @ GS31 40 kg N/ha NR 11.37 2.339 5.6549
13 Ruby Polycoat Urea (ESN) at sowing; 40 kg N/ha 142 12.18 2.479 6.917
14 Ruby Entec urea deep banded at sowing; 40 kg N/ha 142 12.84 2.17 8.3712
15 Ruby Easy N top dressed @ GS31 40 kg N/ha NR 12.18 2.274 6.8568
16 Ruby easy N deep-banded 40 kg N/ha 151 12.04 1.994 6.304
17 Ruby Black urea deep banded at sowing; 40 kg N/ha 135 12.59 2.116 7.1633
18 Ruby Black urea + Zeolite deepbanded at sowing; 40 kg N/ha 115 11.66 2.176 6.4963
19 Ruby Agrotain urea (5L) top dressed @ GS31 40 kg N/ha NR 11.51 2.558 7.8364
20 Ruby Agrotain urea (5L) + zeolite foliar topdressed @ GS31 40 kg N/ha NR 11.71 2.424 6.2919
21 Ruby Agrotain urea (3L) top dressed @ GS 31 40 kg N/ha NR 11.71 2.396 6.7126
22 Ruby 0 kg N/ha 154 11.63 2.33 7.1954

Grain yield t/ha


Loading

Dry matter t/ha


Loading

Establishment plants plants/m2


Loading

Protein %


Loading
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Not specified
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Inverleigh, VIC Not specified
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
Inverleigh, VIC Sodosol
Soil Moisture Source: BOM/ANU
Average amount of water stored in the soil profile during the year, estimated by the OzWALD model-data fusion system.
Year Inverleigh VIC
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000

Climate

Derived climate information

No observed climate data available for this trial.
Derived climate data is determined from trial site location and national weather sources.

Inverleigh VIC

Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.

Trial report and links

2006 trial report



Trial last modified: 01-11-2019 14:10pm AEST