Canola variety trial

2009
CC BY 4.0

Research organisaton
Funding source

Trial details

Researcher(s) Toby Campbell
Sam Cockayne
Jon Midwood
Gary Sheppard
Year(s) 2009
Contributor Southern Farming Systems
Trial location(s) Dunkeld, VIC
Canola variety trial locations
Aims

To compare a number of commercially available varieties representing the different herbicide systems.

Key messages
  • Comparing the herbicide systems, TT varieties had the lowest average yield of 2.05 t/ha and conventional varieties yielded the highest at an average of 2.59 t/ha.
  • The highest yielding variety was Hyola 502 with 2.66 t/ha; the lowest yielding variety was Argyll TT with 1.67 t/ha.
  • Overall oil levels were well below normal. TT varieties averaged 39.3%, clearfield varieties 41.1% and Roundup Ready varieties averaged 41.7%.
  • The hybrid varieties demonstrated much greater early vigour compared to the OP varieties.
Lead research organisation N/A
Host research organisation N/A
Trial funding source SFS
Related program N/A
Acknowledgments

This was an SFS Hamilton Branch funded trial.

Thanks to Doug MacArthur for providing the land for this trials programme.


Other trial partners Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop type Oilseed: Canola
Treatment type(s)
  • Crop: Variety
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Randomised,Replicated,Blocked

Dunkeld 2009

Sow date 20 May 2009
Harvest date 14 December 2009
Plot size 14m x 1.45m
Plot replication Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information

Download results

Trial results Table 1

# Variety
Treatment 1
Grain yield (t/ha) Oil (%)
1 Thunder Triazine tolerant variety 2.37 40.4
2 Monola 77 Triazine tolerant variety 2.32 42.7
3 Atr409 Triazine tolerant variety 2.15 39.4
4 Cb Thumby Triazine tolerant variety 2.09 37.3
5 Lightning Triazine tolerant variety 2.07 39.6
6 Marlin Triazine tolerant variety 2.01 40.9
7 Cb Scaddan Triazine tolerant variety 2 38.1
8 Cb Jardee Triazine tolerant variety 1.79 38
9 Argyll TT Triazine tolerant variety 1.67 37.4
10 Hyola 502 RoundUp Ready canola variety 2.66 39.4
11 46Y20 RoundUp Ready canola variety 2.61 43.6
12 CHYB-166 RoundUp Ready canola variety 2.57 40
13 Hyola 601 RoundUp Ready canola variety 2.41 43.9
14 Hyola 50 Conventional canola variety 2.64 40.7
15 Hyola 76 Conventional canola variety 2.61 42.8
16 Garnet Conventional canola variety 2.52 41.6
17 45Y82 Clearfield canola variety 2.56 42
18 46Y78 Clearfield canola variety 2.51 41.2
19 46Y83 Clearfield canola variety 2.49 41
20 Hyola 571 Clearfield canola variety 2.35 39.7
21 45Y77 Clearfield canola variety 2.26 41.7

Grain yield t/ha


Loading

Oil %


Loading
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Not specified
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Dunkeld, VIC Not specified
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
Dunkeld, VIC Tenosol
Soil Moisture Source: BOM/ANU
Average amount of water stored in the soil profile during the year, estimated by the OzWALD model-data fusion system.
Year Dunkeld VIC
2009 649.0mm
2008 626.2mm
2007 628.2mm
2006 579.1mm
2005 579.6mm
2004 600.7mm
2003 622.2mm
2002 595.6mm
2001 618.8mm
2000 614.6mm
National soil grid Source: CSIRO/TERN
NOTE: National Soil Grid data is aggregated information for background information on the wider area
Actual soil values can vary significantly in a small area and the trial soil tests are the most relevant data where available

Soil properties

Loading

Climate

Derived climate information

No observed climate data available for this trial.
Derived climate data is determined from trial site location and national weather sources.

Dunkeld VIC

Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.



Trial last modified: 09-11-2019 17:36pm AEST