Barley agronomy - maximising yield potential and quality

2012
CC BY 4.0

Research organisation
Funding source

Trial details

Researcher(s) Corinne Celestina (SFS)
Ed Hilsdon (SFS)
Year(s) 2012
Contributor Southern Farming Systems
Trial location(s) Inverleigh, VIC
Barley agronomy - maximising yield potential and quality locations
Aims
  • To observe how such treatments affect yield and grain quality at low, medium and high levels.
Key messages
  • In the 2012 season, barley variety and nitrogen rate had a greater impact on yield and grain quality than plant population
  • There was no significant increase in grain yield from increasing the N rate beyond a 5t/ha yield potential in this season. Any additional applications did not increase the yield enough to justify the cost of the fertiliser.
  • All varieties displayed significant positive responses to the increasing rates of N
  • The 62 kg N/ha rate (for 5t/ha crop) gave us the maximum grain yield return.
  • Optimum plant populations for grain yield were 200plants/m2. In 2012 although increasing plant densities tended to reduce grain quality but they still made malting quality.
Lead research organisation N/A
Host research organisation N/A
Trial funding source GRDC
Related program N/A
Acknowledgments N/A
Other trial partners Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop type Cereal (Grain): Barley
Treatment type(s)
  • Crop : Variety
  • Fertiliser : Rate
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Replicated

Inverleigh 2012

Sow date Not specified
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified
Fertiliser

Nitrogen applied at Growth Stage 31

Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information

Download results

Trial results Table 1

# Variety
Treatment 1
Protein (%) Grain yield (t/ha)
1 Westminster nil N top dressed 9.25 6.87
2 Commander nil N top dressed 9.48 7.12
3 Gairdner nil N top dressed 9.03 6.81
4 Hindmarsh nil N top dressed 10.14 6.4
5 Grange nil N top dressed 9.25 7.51
6 Grange 63kg/ha N top dressed 10.48 7.66
7 Westminster 62kg/ha N top dressed 11.02 7.16
8 Commander 62kg/ha N top dressed 11.03 7.21
9 Gairdner 62kg/ha N top dressed 11.27 7.07
10 Hindmarsh 62kg/ha N top dressed 11.68 7.4
11 Westminster 122kg/ha N top dressed 12.46 7.01
12 Commander 122kg/ha N top dressed 12.19 7.36
13 Gairdner 122kg/ha N top dressed 12.63 6.78
14 Hindmarsh 122kg/ha N top dressed 12.79 7.38
15 Grange 122kg/ha N top dressed 12.5 7.57

Grain yield t/ha


Loading

Protein %


Loading
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Not specified
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Inverleigh, VIC Not specified
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
Inverleigh, VIC Sodosol
Soil Moisture Source: BOM/ANU
Average amount of water stored in the soil profile during the year, estimated by the OzWALD model-data fusion system.
Year Inverleigh VIC
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000

Climate

Derived climate information

No observed climate data available for this trial.
Derived climate data is determined from trial site location and national weather sources.

Inverleigh VIC

Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.

Trial report and links

2012 trial report



Trial last modified: 28-10-2019 16:49pm AEST