Lentils in the southern mallee: varieties, sowing dates and herbicide tolerance

2012

Research organisation
Funding sources

Trial details

Researcher(s) Jason Brand (DPI)
Year(s) 2012
Contributor Birchip Cropping Group
Trial location(s) Curyo, VIC
Lentils in the southern mallee: varieties, sowing dates and herbicide tolerance locations
Aims

To investigate the adaptability of a range of new lentil varieties and variety mixes to varying sowing dates, identify levels of tolerance to a range of group B herbicides in several breeding lines of lentils which have been selected from the Pulse Breeding Australia breeding program for improvements in tolerance to imidazolinone herbicides.

Key messages
  • Newly released varieties, PBA Ace and PBA Bolt, had the highest grain yields at Curyo (southern Mallee, Vic.) in 2012.
  • Yields exceeded 2.5t/ha for both varieties when sown early, despite the very dry season. All varieties had higher grain yields when sown early (May 4) compared with later dates (June 5 and June 22).
  • Varietal differences were evident in the relative decline in grain yield as sowing dates were delayed.
  • Differences in tolerance to a range of group B herbicides were observed in several breeding lines. Pulse Breeding Australia will use this information to define future breeding directions for herbicide tolerant varieties, following PBA Herald XT.
Lead research organisation N/A
Host research organisation N/A
Trial funding source DEPIVic
Trial funding source GRDC DAV00113
Related program N/A
Acknowledgments

This research was funded by GRDC, DPIVic, SARDI and NSWDPI (DAV00113).


Other trial partners Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop type Grain Legume: Lentils
Treatment type(s)
  • Crop : Variety
  • Herbicide : Rate
  • Herbicide : Type
  • Sowing : Timing
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Replicated

Curyo 2012

Sow date 8 May 2012
Harvest date Unknown
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication 3
Fertiliser

MAP + Zn @ 60kg/ha

Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information

Download results

Trial results Table 1

# Treatment 1
Treatment 2
Treatment 3
Grain yield (t/ha) Herbicide damage score (1-9)
1 Nil New Line 1 2.4 1
2 Imazethapyr 700 100g/ha New Line 1 2.07 1
3 Imazethapyr 700 200g/ha New Line 1 2.31 1
4 Imazethapyr 700 400g/ha New Line 1 2.1 1
5 Imi-2 x1 New Line 1 2.46 1
6 Imi-2 x2 New Line 1 2.07 1
7 Imi-2 x4 New Line 1 2.19 1
8 Imi-3 x1 New Line 1 2.25 1
9 Imi-3 x2 New Line 1 2.34 1
10 Imi-3 x4 New Line 1 1.48 4.3
11 Imi-4 x1 New Line 1 2.37 1
12 Imi-4 x2 New Line 1 2.13 1
13 Imi-4 x4 New Line 1 2.25 1
14 Flumetsulam 800 25g/ha New Line 1 2.4 1
15 Flumetsulam 800 50g/ha New Line 1 2.34 1
16 Tri-1 x1 New Line 1 1.99 6.7
17 SU-1 x1 New Line 1 0.65 8
18 SU-2 x1 New Line 1 1.27 6.7
19 SU-3 x1 New Line 1 2.04 1.7
20 SU-4 x1 New Line 1 0.92 7.3
21 Nil New Line 2 1.99 1
22 Imazethapyr 700 100g/ha New Line 2 1.93 1
23 Imazethapyr 700 200g/ha New Line 2 1.69 1
24 Imazethapyr 700 400g/ha New Line 2 1.81 2
25 Imi-2 x1 New Line 2 1.81 1
26 Imi-2 x2 New Line 2 1.96 1.3
27 Imi-2 x4 New Line 2 1.84 1.7
28 Imi-3 x1 New Line 2 1.9 1.3
29 Imi-3 x2 New Line 2 1.78 1.7
30 Imi-3 x4 New Line 2 1.87 1.3
31 Imi-4 x1 New Line 2 1.87 1.3
32 Imi-4 x2 New Line 2 1.93 1.3
33 Imi-4 x4 New Line 2 1.54 2.3
34 Flumetsulam 800 25g/ha New Line 2 1.48 1.7
35 Flumetsulam 800 50g/ha New Line 2 0.86 3
36 Tri-1 x1 New Line 2 0.42 9
37 SU-1 x1 New Line 2 0 9
38 SU-2 x1 New Line 2 0 9
39 SU-3 x1 New Line 2 1.69 7.3
40 SU-4 x1 New Line 2 0 9
41 Nil New Line 3 2.19 1
42 Imazethapyr 700 100g/ha New Line 3 2.1 1.3
43 Imazethapyr 700 200g/ha New Line 3 2.16 1
44 Imazethapyr 700 400g/ha New Line 3 2.22 1.7
45 Imi-2 x1 New Line 3 1.9 1
46 Imi-2 x2 New Line 3 2.13 1.3
47 Imi-2 x4 New Line 3 2.19 2.3
48 Imi-3 x1 New Line 3 2.31 1
49 Imi-3 x2 New Line 3 2.04 1
50 Imi-3 x4 New Line 3 2.28 1.3
51 Imi-4 x1 New Line 3 2.16 1.3
52 Imi-4 x2 New Line 3 2.28 1
53 Imi-4 x4 New Line 3 2.25 1.7
54 Flumetsulam 800 25g/ha New Line 3 2.02 1
55 Flumetsulam 800 50g/ha New Line 3 1.99 1.3
56 Tri-1 x1 New Line 3 1.51 8
57 SU-1 x1 New Line 3 0 9
58 SU-2 x1 New Line 3 0 9
59 SU-3 x1 New Line 3 1.63 6
60 SU-4 x1 New Line 3 0 9
61 Nil PBA Flash 2.52 1
62 Imazethapyr 700 100g/ha PBA Flash 0.8 7
63 Imazethapyr 700 200g/ha PBA Flash 0 7
64 Imazethapyr 700 400g/ha PBA Flash 0 8.7
65 Imi-2 x1 PBA Flash 0 8
66 Imi-2 x2 PBA Flash 0.74 7.3
67 Imi-2 x4 PBA Flash 0 8.7
68 Imi-3 x1 PBA Flash 0 9
69 Imi-3 x2 PBA Flash 0 9
70 Imi-3 x4 PBA Flash 0 9
71 Imi-4 x1 PBA Flash 0 9
72 Imi-4 x2 PBA Flash 0 9
73 Imi-4 x4 PBA Flash 0 9
74 Flumetsulam 800 25g/ha PBA Flash 1.33 2.3
75 Flumetsulam 800 50g/ha PBA Flash 0.89 4.3
76 Tri-1 x1 PBA Flash 0.83 8.7
77 SU-1 x1 PBA Flash 0 9
78 SU-2 x1 PBA Flash 0 9
79 SU-3 x1 PBA Flash 1.07 8
80 SU-4 x1 PBA Flash 0 9
81 Nil PBA Herald XT 1.78 1
82 Imazethapyr 700 100g/ha PBA Herald XT 1.81 1
83 Imazethapyr 700 200g/ha PBA Herald XT 1.69 1.3
84 Imazethapyr 700 400g/ha PBA Herald XT 1.57 1
85 Imi-2 x1 PBA Herald XT 1.84 1
86 Imi-2 x2 PBA Herald XT 1.57 1.3
87 Imi-2 x4 PBA Herald XT 1.78 1.3
88 Imi-3 x1 PBA Herald XT 1.69 1
89 Imi-3 x2 PBA Herald XT 1.66 2.7
90 Imi-3 x4 PBA Herald XT 1.42 4
91 Imi-4 x1 PBA Herald XT 1.51 1.3
92 Imi-4 x2 PBA Herald XT 1.87 1.3
93 Imi-4 x4 PBA Herald XT 1.69 1.7
94 Flumetsulam 800 25g/ha PBA Herald XT 1.81 1
95 Flumetsulam 800 50g/ha PBA Herald XT 1.84 1
96 Tri-1 x1 PBA Herald XT 1.69 6.7
97 SU-1 x1 PBA Herald XT 0.33 8.7
98 SU-2 x1 PBA Herald XT 1.24 7
99 SU-3 x1 PBA Herald XT 1.63 3.3
100 SU-4 x1 PBA Herald XT 0.42 8

Grain yield t/ha


Loading

Herbicide damage score 1-9


Loading
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Not specified
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Curyo, VIC Not specified
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
Curyo, VIC Calcarosol
Soil Moisture Source: BOM/ANU
Average amount of water stored in the soil profile during the year, estimated by the OzWALD model-data fusion system.
Year Curyo VIC
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000

Climate

Derived climate information

No observed climate data available for this trial.
Derived climate data is determined from trial site location and national weather sources.

Curyo VIC

NOTE: Exact trial site locality unknown - Climate data may not be accurate
Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.

Trial report and links

2012 trial report



Trial last modified: 16-01-2023 11:27am AEST