Delaying harvest: what is the penalty?

2013

Research organisation
Funding source

Trial details

Researcher(s) Simon Craig (BCG)
Linda Walters (BCG)
Year(s) 2013
Contributor Birchip Cropping Group
Trial location(s) Watchupga East, VIC
Delaying harvest: what is the penalty? locations
Aims

To compare the performance of new and current barley varieties at two different harvest times and to determine if delaying harvest compromises yield and grain quality.

Key messages

Delaying harvest decreased barley yields by 0.3t/ha. Scope CL and Gairdner harvest should be prioritised in the Mallee due to high susceptibility to head loss and yield loss. It is more profitable to grow higher yielding varieties and minimising their risks to delayed harvest, than to grow lower yielding varieties that have less susceptibility to delayed harvest.

Lead research organisation N/A
Host research organisation N/A
Trial funding source GRDC DAN00173
Related program Management of Barley and Barley Cultivars for the Southern Region
Acknowledgments

The trial was funded by the GRDC’s ‘Barley Agronomy for the Southern Region’ project (project code: DAN00173).


Other trial partners Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop type Cereal (Grain): Barley
Treatment type(s)
  • Crop : Variety
  • Harvest : Timing
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Replicated

Watchupga East 2013

Sow date 1 May 2013
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication 4
Fertiliser

2 May - Granulock Supreme Z (50kg/ha) (treated with flutriafol 400ml/ha) 2 July - Liquid Zinc (2L/ha) 9 July - Urea (90kg/ha)

Herbicide

2 May - TriflurX (2L/ha) + Avadex® Xtra (2L/ha) + Weedmaster DUO® (2L/ha) + Hasten (1%) – pre-sowing 9 July - Velocity® (670ml/ha) + Lontrel™ Advanced (50ml/ha) + Hasten (1%)

Insecticide

23 September Alpha Duo (200ml/ha)

Fungicide

29 August - Prosaro® (150ml/ha) + Spreadwet 1000 (0.25%)

Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information

Download results

Trial results Table 1

# Variety
Treatment 1
Protein (%) Grain yield (t/ha) Test weight (kg/hL) Retention (%) Head loss (no./m2)
1 Average Optimum Harvest 8.3 3.2 70 92 3
2 Average Delayed Harvest 8 2.9 66 94 13

Grain yield t/ha


Loading

Head loss no./m2


Loading

Protein %


Loading

Retention %


Loading

Test weight kg/hL


Loading
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Not specified
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Watchupga East, VIC Sandy loam
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
Watchupga East, VIC Calcarosol
Soil Moisture Source: BOM/ANU
Average amount of water stored in the soil profile during the year, estimated by the OzWALD model-data fusion system.
Year Watchupga East VIC
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000

Climate

Derived climate information

No observed climate data available for this trial.
Derived climate data is determined from trial site location and national weather sources.

Watchupga East VIC

NOTE: Exact trial site locality unknown - Climate data may not be accurate
Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.

Trial report and links

2013 trial report



Trial last modified: 05-07-2019 13:59pm AEST