Knockdown options for glyphosate resistant ryegrass

2015

Research organisation
Funding source

Trial details

Researcher(s) Kelly Angel (BCG)
Simon Monk (Clovercrest Consulting)
Year(s) 2015
Contributor Birchip Cropping Group
Trial location(s) Lillimur, VIC
Further information View external link
Knockdown options for glyphosate resistant ryegrass locations
Aims

To investigate the effectiveness of the use of different herbicides and spraying regimes prior to sowing in controlling annual ryegrass and to increase grower awareness of rotating the various knockdown options pre-sowing.

Key messages
  • It is no longer a question of whether ryegrass will become resistant; it is when! 
  • Double knock was the most effective treatment for managing this ryegrass population  (98% control).
  • Alternative crop options should be integrated into the rotation to manage weeds and reduce the reliance of glyphosate. 
  • High water rates, spraying closer to evening and no later than 7-10 days after the initial knockdown are essential when using Paraquat.
Lead research organisation Birchip Cropping Group
Host research organisation N/A
Trial funding source GRDC CLO00001
Related program Agribusiness Trial Extension Network
Acknowledgments

This trial was funded by the GRDC as part of the ‘Agribusiness Trial Extension Networks: Identify options for the control of glyphosate resistant ryegrass’ project (CLO00001).


Other trial partners Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop type None: No crop specified
Treatment type(s)
  • Herbicide : Rate
  • Herbicide : Timing
  • Herbicide : Type
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Randomised,Replicated,Blocked

Lillimur 2015

Sow rate or Target density 1500 plants/m2
Sow date Not specified
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size 20m x 6m
Plot replication Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information

Download results

Trial results Table 1

# Treatment 1
Weed control (%) Initial weed count ((no. of plants)) 28 days after application (days)
1 Control 0 1412 1412
2 SL 3825 (2L) 21.5 1355 1143
3 Alliance (1.5L) 45.4 1640 861
4 Alliance (2L) 48.1 1363 721
5 Gramozone (2L) 50.4 1384 624
6 Para-Trooper (2L) 73.8 1634 437
7 SL 3825 (2L) + Gramoxone (1L) 76.8 1195 260
8 Goal (200ml) + Gramoxone (2L) 78.5 1676 439
9 SL 3825 (2L) + Gramoxone (2L) 83.4 1580 242
10 Glyphosate (1L) 87.9 1259 181
11 Boxer Gold (2.5L) + Gramoxone (2L) 89.8 1480 149
12 Glyphosate (1L) fb Gramoxone (2L, 7 days) 98.6 1280 17

28 days after application days


Loading

Initial weed count (no. of plants)


Loading

Weed control %


Loading
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Not specified
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Lillimur, VIC Not specified
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
Lillimur, VIC Vertosol
Soil Moisture Source: BOM/ANU
Average amount of water stored in the soil profile during the year, estimated by the OzWALD model-data fusion system.
Year Lillimur VIC
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000

Climate

Derived climate information

No observed climate data available for this trial.
Derived climate data is determined from trial site location and national weather sources.

Lillimur VIC

Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.

Trial report and links

2015 trial report



Trial last modified: 08-05-2019 09:25am AEST