Comparisons of seven wheat varieties at Eradu

2012

Research organisaton
Funding source

Trial details

Researcher(s) Darren Chitty (Landmark)
Year(s) 2012
Contributor North East Farming Futures
Trial location(s) Eradu, WA
Comparisons of seven wheat varieties at Eradu locations
Aims

To assess the yield and quality attributes and subsequent gross margin returns for 7 commonly grown wheat varieties.

Key messages
  • KING ROCK fell in a hole early, ran up quickly and often looked very heat and moisture stressed.
  • LONGREACH COBRA did not handle a dry year. It did not appear robust or durable in a dry warm season.
  • CORACK and MACE handled drought stress well.
  • CALINGIRI and MAGENTA looked the most durable and robust all year.
  • CALINGIRI again proved very adaptable.
Lead research organisation North East Farming Futures
Host research organisation N/A
Trial funding source Landmark
Related program N/A
Acknowledgments
  • Nino and Paul Messina (Bindu Farms)
  • Darren Chitty – R & D Agronomist, Landmark Northam
  • Bernie Quade, Kathryn Fleay, Grant Thompson –Landmark Geraldton.
  • Matu Pepi – Longreach.
  • Nick Joyce, AGT.
  • Christine Zaicou - DAFWA.
  • CBH
  • Planfarm
  • AHRI
  • CSBP
  • Nufarm
  • DAFWA
  • GRDC
  • Landmark

Other trial partners Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop type Wheat
Treatment type(s)
  • Variety: Type
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Replicated

Eradu 2012

Sow rate or Target density 75kg/ha
Sow date 3 May 2012
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication 3
Fertiliser

125kg Super Potash 3:1 spread in March + 50kg MacroPro Extra banded, no post - em N.4.9N, 14.1P, 21.1K, 15S.

Herbicide

Site sprayed with 1L Lorsban,1.5L Triflur 480, 118g sakura, 50g Logran B - Power Post Spray – Nil.

Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information

Download results

Trial results Table 1

# Variety
Protein (%) Grain yield (t/ha) Hectolitre weight (kg/hL) Screenings (%)
1 Calingiri 14 1.86 79.1 2.4
2 Magenta 13.4 1.69 81.3 1.7
3 Corack 12.3 1.61 81.1 1.5
4 Mace 12.8 1.45 81.4 1.5
5 Wyalkatchem 12.3 1.42 82.4 2.5
6 Cobra 13.4 1.39 80.8 4.6
7 King Rock 13.6 1.32 80 3.5

Grain yield t/ha


Loading

Hectolitre weight kg/hL


Loading

Protein %


Loading

Screenings %


Loading
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Not specified
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Eradu, WA Not specified
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
Eradu, WA Tenosol
Soil Moisture Source: BOM/ANU
Average amount of water stored in the soil profile during the year, estimated by the OzWALD model-data fusion system.
Year Eradu WA
2012 178.8mm
2011 222.5mm
2010 162.5mm
2009 179.7mm
2008 216.3mm
2007 171.5mm
2006 161.4mm
2005 168.5mm
2004 170.2mm
2003 182.5mm
2002 160.2mm
2001 140.7mm
2000 212.3mm
National soil grid Source: CSIRO/TERN
NOTE: National Soil Grid data is aggregated information for background information on the wider area
Actual soil values can vary significantly in a small area and the trial soil tests are the most relevant data where available

Soil properties

Loading

Climate

Derived climate information

No observed climate data available for this trial.
Derived climate data is determined from trial site location and national weather sources.

Eradu WA

Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.



Trial last modified: 25-06-2019 12:54pm AEST