Cereal variety and nitrogen responses to grazing

2016

Research organisation
Funding source

Trial details

Researcher(s) Alison Frischke (BCG)
Year(s) 2016
Contributor Birchip Cropping Group
Trial location(s) Warmur, VIC
Further information View external link
Cereal variety and nitrogen responses to grazing locations
Aims

To evaluate how new and existing wheat and barley varieties respond to grazing and post-grazing nitrogen (N) application rates.

Key messages
  • Grazed crops showed no effects from grazing in 2016 – an excellent season producing high early biomass. Crops recovered and yielded very well.
  • Trojan and LRPB Arrow were the best dual purpose wheat varieties.
  • Fathom, Spartacus and Rosalind were the best dual purpose barley varieties.
Lead research organisation Birchip Cropping Group
Host research organisation N/A
Trial funding source GRDC SFS00028
Related program Grain & Graze
Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the GRDC as part of the Grain & Graze 3 – Southern Region project (SFS00028).


Other trial partners Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop types Cereal (Grain): Barley Cereal (Grain): Wheat
Treatment type(s)
  • Crop : Variety
  • Fertiliser : Application Method
  • Grazing : Application Method
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Randomised,Replicated,Blocked

Warmur 2016 Barley

Sow rate or Target density 130 plants/m²
Sowing machinery

Knife points, press wheels, 30cm row spacing

Sow date 21 April 2016 21 April, 4 May
Harvest date 11 November 2016 11 November, 25 November, 10 December
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified
Fertiliser

Trial specific

Herbicide

Trial specific

Insecticide

Trial specific

Fungicide

Trial specific

Warmur 2016 Wheat

Sow rate or Target density Not specified
Sowing machinery Not specified
Sow date Not specified
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified
Fertiliser Not specified
Herbicide Not specified
Insecticide Not specified
Fungicide Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information

Download results

Trial results Barley variety feed test results from GS30 biomass cuts

# Variety
Grazing duration (DSE/days) Crude protein (% of DM) Neutral detergent fibre (% of DM) Digestibility DMD (% of DM) Metabolisable energy (MJ/kg DM) Acid detergent fibre (% DM) Digestibility (MJ/kg DM)
1 Compass 1339 34.7 36.6 82.9 12.6 25.5 77
2 Rosalind 1287 34.2 36.1 81.6 12.4 25.9 76
3 Fathom 1244 32.9 37.6 82.5 12.6 25 76.7
4 Scope 1087 33 37.5 82.9 12.6 26.3 77
5 La Trobe 923 35.7 34.2 79.6 12.1 29 74.3
6 Spartacus CL 800 33.9 35.7 80.8 12.3 25.9 75.3
7 Moby 752 34.3 37.3 84 12.8 22.3 78

Acid detergent fibre % DM


Loading

Crude protein % of DM


Loading

Digestibility MJ/kg DM


Loading

Digestibility DMD % of DM


Loading

Grazing duration DSE/days


Loading

Metabolisable energy MJ/kg DM


Loading

Neutral detergent fibre % of DM


Loading
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Site Depth Type pH EC P K N A OC CAT
Warmur, VIC 0 - 10cm 22.00 1.10
Warmur, VIC 0 - 70cm 56.00
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Warmur, VIC Clay loam
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
Warmur, VIC Calcarosol
Soil Moisture Source: BOM/ANU
Average amount of water stored in the soil profile during the year, estimated by the OzWALD model-data fusion system.
Year Warmur VIC
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000

Climate

Warmur VIC 2016


Observed climate information

Rainfall trial total (mm) 444mm
Rainfall trial gsr (mm) 371mm

Derived climate information

Warmur VIC

Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.

Trial report and links

2016 trial report



Trial last modified: 05-12-2019 12:05pm AEST