Managing wheat yield and quality risks through plant density and nitrogen application

2012
CC BY 4.0

Research organisations
Funding sources

Trial details

Researcher(s) Melanie Kupsch (DAFWA)
Anne Smith (DAFWA)
Christine Zaicou-Kunesch (DAFWA)
Year(s) 2012
Contributor West Midlands Group
Trial location(s) Badgingarra, WA
Managing wheat yield and quality risks through plant density and nitrogen application locations
Aims

To determine value of agronomic management (sowing rate and nitrogen) on production of quality grain for profitable wheat systems.

Key messages
  • Cobra and Mace were significantly higher yielding than Emu Rock at all seeding densities (P<0.05). There was a yield increase for Emu Rock and Cobra when plant density increased from 83 plants/m2 to 130 plants/m². Further  increases in plant density did not improve or reduced grain yield of these varieties. There was a yield increase for Mace from 130 plants/m2 162 plants/m2. Increasing plant density did not influence grain screenings which were less than 2% for all varieties.
  • At Badgingarra, nitrogen application at seeding (14, 30, 60 and 90 kg/ha) did not affect grain yield at either seeding densities (data not provided).   The soil was a red sandy loam with nitrate levels in the top 20 cm of soil at 55mg/kg.   Protein levels in the grain were in excess of 12.5% for all treatments and varieties.  The higher split nitrogen application did significantly increase protein by 0.4% however without a yield increase the late N application was not economical.   This may be a strategy to consider for high yielding varieties such as Mace.  At the higher plant density, and higher yield, Mace had lower protein than Cobra and Emu Rock.  
Lead research organisation Department of Agriculture and Food WA
Host research organisation West Midlands Group
Trial funding source GRDC
Trial funding source DAFWA
Related program Tactical wheat agronomy for the west
Acknowledgments

Appreciate the support of the West Midlands Group with trial planning and preparation.   DAFWA’s technical services team for terrific trial management.  GRDC and DAFWA jointly support this research aiming to improve profitability of wheat production through the Wheat Agronomy Project DAW 218.


Other trial partners Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop type Cereal (Grain): Wheat
Treatment type(s)
  • Fertiliser : Type
  • Sowing : Rate
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Replicated

Badgingarra 2012

Sowing machinery

Cone seeder.

Sow date 5 June 2012
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size 1.54m x 20m
Plot replication 3
Fertiliser

100kg/ha Agstar Extra drilled and 25 kg/ha Muriate Potash topdressed at seeding.

Herbicide

2L/ha Sprayseed +1L/ha @100 L/ha Irrigator Extend +118 g/ha Sakura + 1.5 L/ha Treflan IBS.

Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information
Trial source data and summary not available
Check the trial report PDF for trial results.
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Not specified
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Badgingarra, WA Brown red sandy loam
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
Badgingarra, WA Chromosol
Soil Moisture Source: BOM/ANU
Average amount of water stored in the soil profile during the year, estimated by the OzWALD model-data fusion system.
Year Badgingarra WA
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000

Climate

Badgingarra WA 2012


Observed climate information

Rainfall trial gsr (mm) 332mm

Derived climate information

Badgingarra WA

NOTE: Exact trial site locality unknown - Climate data may not be accurate
Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.

Trial report and links

2012 trial report



Trial last modified: 09-07-2019 15:45pm AEST