Evaluate newly registered seed treatments for loose smut and rhizoctonia in Hindmarsh barley

2013
CC BY 4.0

Research organisatons
Funding source

Trial details

Researcher(s) Rick Horbury (Bayer Crop Science)
Year(s) 2013
Contributor West Midlands Group
Trial location(s) Regans Ford, WA
Evaluate newly registered seed treatments for loose smut and rhizoctonia in Hindmarsh barley locations
Aims
  • To compare EverGol Prime, Vibrance and Tripower to Baytan T for loose smut control.
  • To compare EverGol Prime compared to triazole seed treatments for rhizoctonia suppression.
Key messages
  • All treatments met Hindmarsh food grade parameters although loose smut was not tested for, which may have excluded the untreated from delivery due to its levels of infection.
  • There was no significant difference in yield between treatments.
Lead research organisation Bayer CropScience
Host research organisation West Midlands Group
Trial funding source Bayer
Related program N/A
Acknowledgments

Thanks to Living Farm for setting up the trial and thanks to the Negus family for providing the trial site.


Other trial partners Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop type Barley
Treatment type(s)
  • Fungicide: Type
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Replicated

Regans Ford 2013

Sow rate or Target density 70kg/ha
Sow date 3 June 2013
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size 2.5m x 20m
Plot replication 3
Fertiliser

60 kg of Gusto® Gold or similar banded, 60 kg of Urea top dressed

Herbicide

Glyphosate 2 L/ha 30/4/13, SpraySeed® 2.5 L/ha + Ally® 3 g/ha 12/7/13, Glyphosate 2 L/ha + Sakura® 118 g/ha + Lorsban® 1 L/ha 3/6/13

Velocity® 670 mL/ha + Hasten® 14/7/13

Fungicide

Prosaro® 150 mL/ha + Uptake® 0.5% v/v 16/8/13.

Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information
Trial source data and summary not available
Check the trial report PDF for trial results.
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Not specified
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Regans Ford, WA Sand to sandy loam
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
Regans Ford, WA Tenosol
Soil Moisture Source: BOM/ANU
Average amount of water stored in the soil profile during the year, estimated by the OzWALD model-data fusion system.
Year Regans Ford WA
2013 151.9mm
2012 138.2mm
2011 136.9mm
2010 129.1mm
2009 142.1mm
2008 151.9mm
2007 107.9mm
2006 103.7mm
2005 142.2mm
2004 124.4mm
2003 142.9mm
2002 113.0mm
2001 115.0mm
2000 134.4mm
National soil grid Source: CSIRO/TERN
NOTE: National Soil Grid data is aggregated information for background information on the wider area
Actual soil values can vary significantly in a small area and the trial soil tests are the most relevant data where available

Soil properties

Loading

Climate

Regans Ford WA 2013


Observed climate information

Rainfall trial gsr (mm) 530mm

Derived climate information

Regans Ford WA

Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.



Trial last modified: 09-07-2019 15:52pm AEST