What crop production responses can we expect from surface applied liming?

2015
CC BY 4.0

Research organisation
Funding sources

Trial details

Researcher(s) Lisa Miller (SFS)
Year(s) 2015
Contributor Southern Farming Systems
Trial location(s) Rokewood, VIC
Werneth, VIC
What crop production responses can we expect from surface applied liming? locations
Aims

To help understand the yield penalties we can expect if good pH levels are not maintained and how
frequently lime needs to be applied.

Key messages
  • Soil acidity cost $170/ha to $228/ha alone in yield penalties in 2015
  • Keeping pH at good levels by liming prevents yield penalties
  • Increasing soil aluminium levels caused by pH falling below 4.8, provides a good guide to the likely yield penalties incurred 
Lead research organisation Southern Farming Systems
Host research organisation N/A
Trial funding source GRDC
Trial funding source DAFF VIC
Trial funding source CCMA
Related program N/A
Acknowledgments

Funding acknowledgement to be made to GRDC and CCMA through the support of DAFF. 


Other trial partners Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop types Cereal (Grain): Barley Cereal (Grain): Wheat Oilseed: Canola Grain Legume: Faba beans
Treatment type(s)
  • Crop : Type
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Randomised,Replicated,Blocked

Rokewood 2015 Barley

Sow date Not specified
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified

Rokewood 2015 Wheat

Sow date Not specified
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified

Rokewood 2015 Canola

Sow date Not specified
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified

Rokewood 2015 Faba beans

Sow date Not specified
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified

Werneth 2015 Barley

Sow date Not specified
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size 4m x 14m
Plot replication Not specified

Werneth 2015 Wheat

Sow date Not specified
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified

Werneth 2015 Canola

Sow date Not specified
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified

Werneth 2015 Faba beans

Sow date Not specified
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information
Trial source data and summary not available
Check the trial report PDF for trial results.
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Not specified
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Rokewood, VIC Not specified
Werneth, VIC Not specified
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
Rokewood, VIC Sodosol
Werneth, VIC Sodosol
Soil Moisture Source: BOM/ANU
Average amount of water stored in the soil profile during the year, estimated by the OzWALD model-data fusion system.
Year Rokewood VIC Werneth VIC
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000

Climate

Derived climate information

No observed climate data available for this trial.
Derived climate data is determined from trial site location and national weather sources.

Rokewood VIC

Werneth VIC

Rokewood VIC

Loading
Loading
Loading

Werneth VIC

Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.

Trial report and links

2015 trial report



Trial last modified: 20-10-2019 12:39pm AEST