1. Home ::  
  2. Trial Search

Comparison of wheat varieties

2017
CC BY 4.0

Research organisation
Hart Field Site Group

Trial details

Researcher(s) Dylan Bruce (Hart Field Site Group)
Year(s) 2017
Contributor Hart Field Site Group
Trial location(s) Hart, SA
Comparison of wheat varieties locations
Aims

To compare the performance of new wheat varieties against the current industry standards.

Key messages
  • There were a number of high yielding (3.82 – 4.24 t/ha) AH varieties at Hart in 2017 including, Beckom, Scepter, Arrow, Cobra, Mace and Scout.
  • Trojan and Cutlass were the highest yielding APW varieties at 4.32 and 4.00 t/ha, respectively.
  • Test weight and screening levels across the trial were good, averaging 80.2 kg/hL and 0.8%.
Lead research organisation Hart Field Site Group
Host research organisation N/A
Related program N/A
Acknowledgments N/A
Other trial partners Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop type Cereal (Grain): Wheat
Treatment type(s)
  • Crop : Variety
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Randomised,Replicated,Blocked

Hart 2017

Sow date 8 May 2017
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size 1.75m x 10m
Plot replication Not specified
Fertiliser
  • DAP (18:20) + Impact @ 100 kg/ha
  • UAN (42:0) @ 60 L/ha on 3rd July
  • UAN (42:0) @ 60 L/ha on 2nd August
Other trial notes

While all due care has been taken in compiling the information within this manual the Hart Field-Site Group Inc or researchers involved take no liability resulting from the interpretation or use of these results. We do not endorse or recommend the products of any manufacturers referred to. Other products may perform as well or better than those specifically referred to. Any research with un-registered products and rates in the manual does not constitute a recommendation for that particular use by the researchers or the Hart Field-Site Group Inc.
Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information

Download results

Trial results Table 1

# Variety
 Protein (%) Screenings (%) Grain yield (t/ha) Test weight (kg/hL)
1 █ Arrow 10 0.4 3.94 80.8
2 █ Beckom 10.6 0.7 4.29 80.4
3 █ Cobra 10.4 0.6 3.82 78.5
4 █ Cosmick 10.1 2.5 3.73 79.8
5 █ DS Darwin 9.9 0.5 3.61 80.4
6 █ Emu Rock 10.9 0.7 3.75 80.8
7 █ Grenade CL Plus 10.5 0.4 3.63 79.9
8 █ Hatchet CL Plus 11.8 0.3 3.31 79.7
9 █ Havoc (LPB13-1995) 10.2 0.5 3.75 80.5
10 █ Kord CL Plus 11.7 1 3.7 79.9
11 █ Mace 10.4 0.4 3.91 80.2
12 █ Scepter 9.8 0.7 4.24 81
13 █ Scout 10 0.4 4.11 82.2
14 █ Corack 11 0.2 3.29 80.8
15 █ Cutlass 9.9 0.6 4 80
16 █ DS Pascal 11.1 2.8 3.44 76.5
17 █ Estoc 11.2 0.7 3.68 81.8
18 █ Trojan 10 0.5 4.32 80.4
19 █ RAC2338 9.7 0.6 4.13 79.8
20 █ RAC2517 9.7 0.5 3.95 80.7

Grain yield t/ha

Loading

Protein %

Loading

Screenings %

Loading

Test weight kg/hL

Loading
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Not specified
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Hart, SA Not specified
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
Hart, SA Chromosol
Soil Moisture Source: BOM/ANU
Average amount of water stored in the soil profile during the year, estimated by the OzWALD model-data fusion system.
Year Hart SA
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000

Climate

Derived climate information

No observed climate data available for this trial.
Derived climate data is determined from trial site location and national weather sources.

Hart SA

Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.

Trial report and links

2017 trial report



Trial last modified: 11-06-2019 15:10pm AEST