1. Home ::  
  2. Trial Search

Comparison of barley varieties

2016
CC BY 4.0

Research organisation
Hart Field Site Group

Trial details

Researcher(s) Rochelle Wheaton (Hart Field Site Group)
Year(s) 2016
Contributor Hart Field Site Group
Trial location(s) Hart, SA
Comparison of barley varieties locations
Aims

To compare the performance of new barley varieties and lines against the current industry standards.

Key messages
  • Oxford, Rosalind, Fathom and Fleet were the highest yielding feed barley varieties at Hart averaging 4.96 t/ha.
  • Admiral, Charger and Navigator were the highest yielding commercially available malt varieties averaging 5.28 t/ha.
  • Test weights, retention and screening levels were good across the trial with site averages of 65.8 kg/hL, 97.4% and 0.6% respectively.
Lead research organisation Hart Field Site Group
Host research organisation N/A
Related program N/A
Acknowledgments N/A
Other trial partners Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop type Cereal (Grain): Barley
Treatment type(s)
  • Crop : Variety
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Randomised,Replicated,Blocked

Hart 2016

Sow date 10 May 2016
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size 1.75m x 10m
Plot replication Not specified
Fertiliser
  • DAP (18:20) + Zn 2% @ 100 kg/ha
  • UAN (42:0) @ 95 L/ha, 4th July
Fungicide
  • Systiva @ 150 mL/100 kg seed
  • Amistar Xtra @ 400 mL/ha, 6th Aug
  • Propiconazole (500 g/L) @ 250 mL/ha, 12th Sept
Other trial notes

While all due care has been taken in compiling the information within this manual the Hart Field-Site Group Inc or researchers involved take no liability resulting from the interpretation or use of these results. We do not endorse or recommend the products of any manufacturers referred to. Other products may perform as well or better than those specifically referred to. Any research with un-registered products and rates in the manual does not constitute a recommendation for that particular use by the researchers or the Hart Field-Site Group Inc.
Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information

Download results

Trial results Table 1

# Variety
 Protein (%) Screenings (%) Grain yield (t/ha)
1 █ Fathom 10.2 0.6 4.8
2 █ Fleet 9.8 0.5 4.6
3 █ Hindmarsh 9.7 1 4.2
4 █ Keel 10.2 0.7 4.47
5 █ Maritime 10.4 0.4 4.25
6 █ Oxford 8 0.5 5.63
7 █ Rosalind 8.9 0.5 4.83
8 █ Admiral 9 0.5 5.31
9 █ Bass 10 0.5 4.91
10 █ Buloke 9.8 0.6 4.61
11 █ Charger 9.2 0.8 5.27
12 █ Commander 9.5 0.6 4.25
13 █ Granger 9.4 0.6 4.77
14 █ La Trobe 9.5 0.9 4.33
15 █ Navigator 8.7 0.5 5.24
16 █ Schooner 10.4 0.7 3.36
17 █ Scope 9.8 0.6 4.36
18 █ SouthernStar 9.7 0.4 4.27
19 █ Eplorer 8.9 0.8 5.25
20 █ Spartacus CL 9.9 0.7 4.38
21 █ Compass 9.3 0.4 3.96

Grain yield t/ha

Loading

Protein %

Loading

Screenings %

Loading
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Not specified
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Hart, SA Not specified
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
Hart, SA Chromosol
Soil Moisture Source: BOM/ANU
Average amount of water stored in the soil profile during the year, estimated by the OzWALD model-data fusion system.
Year Hart SA
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000

Climate

Derived climate information

No observed climate data available for this trial.
Derived climate data is determined from trial site location and national weather sources.

Hart SA

Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.

Trial report and links

2016 trial report



Trial last modified: 11-06-2019 12:02pm AEST