Barley time of sowing and depth

2013
CC BY 4.0

Research organisations
Funding source

Trial details

Researcher(s) Kenton Porker (SARDI)
Rob Wheeler (SARDI)
Year(s) 2013
Contributor Hart Field Site Group
Trial location(s) Hart, SA
Barley time of sowing and depth locations
Aims

To compare the competing demands of timeliness of sowing versus sowing to maximise establishment (deep versus dry sowing, or waiting for adequate rainfall later in the season).

Key messages
  • LaTrobe, GrangeR, and Skipper had reduced emergence from deeper sowing under both dry and wet sowing conditions. 
  • Varieties differed in their sensitivity to sowing time; variety choice and sowing time influenced grain yield and quality more than sowing depth.
  • LaTrobe and Fathom were the highest yielding varieties across both sowing dates.
  • Commander and Skipper were the only varieties to suffer a yield penalty from early dry sowing.
  • GrangeR yielded similar to Commander at earlier sowing but less when delayed.
  • Screenings were greater than 7% and retention less than 70% in LaTrobe across both sowing times, and in Commander and GrangeR at earlier sowing only.
  • Skipper was the only variety to achieve malt specifications across both sowing times.
Lead research organisation South Australian Research and Development Institute
Host research organisation Hart Field Site Group
Trial funding source GRDC
Related program N/A
Acknowledgments N/A
Other trial partners Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop type Cereal (Grain): Barley
Treatment type(s)
  • Crop : Variety
  • Sowing : Timing
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Randomised,Replicated,Blocked

Hart 2013

Sow date 10 May 2013
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size 1.4m x 10m
Plot replication Not specified
Fertiliser

DAP (18:20) + 2% Zn @ 70kg/ha

Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information

Download results

Trial results Table 1

@T1: TOS 1 (10-05-2013) @T2: TOS 2 (31-05-2013)
# Variety
Protein (%) Grain yield (t/ha) Test weight (kg/hL) Screenings (<2.2mm sieve) (%) Protein (%) Grain yield (t/ha) Test weight (kg/hL) Screenings (<2.2mm sieve) (%)
1 Commander 10.4 4.56 67.4 8.9 10.8 5.02 67.4 4.5
1 Commander 10 5.42 68.2 3.3 11.1 5.2 68.3 1.3
2 Fathom 10.6 4.86 66.3 3 11.1 4.85 66.2 2.4
2 Fathom 10.5 4.67 67.8 7.3 10.9 4.68 67 3.2
3 Fleet 10.1 5.4 69.7 7.2 10.7 5.29 69.3 7.8
3 Fleet 10.4 4.44 69.8 4.4 10.7 4.98 69.3 2.8
4 Granger
4 Granger
5 La Trobe
5 La Trobe
6 Skipper
6 Skipper

Grain yield t/ha


Loading

Protein %


Loading

Screenings (<2.2mm sieve) %


Loading

Test weight kg/hL


Loading
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Not specified
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Hart, SA Calcarosol
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
Hart, SA Chromosol
Soil Moisture Source: BOM/ANU
Average amount of water stored in the soil profile during the year, estimated by the OzWALD model-data fusion system.
Year Hart SA
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000

Climate

Hart SA 2013


Observed climate information

Rainfall trial gsr (mm) 303mm

Derived climate information

Hart SA

Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.

Trial report and links

2013 trial report



Trial last modified: 06-06-2019 14:25pm AEST