Yield response to PGR on Barley

2017

Research organisations
Funding source

Trial details

Researcher(s) Damian Jones
Year(s) 2017
Contributor Irrigated Cropping Council
Trial location(s) Kerang, VIC
Yield response to PGR on Barley locations
Aims

To asses the effect of PGR application on barley

Key messages

The Plant Growth Regulator trinexapac-ethyl (Moddus Evo) has been shown in previous trials to increase yield in irrigated barley, but not necessarliy due to reduced lodging. This trial appears to indicate that the PGR resulted  increased tiller survival in lower plant populations of certain varieties. 

Some varities have shown no yield response to PGR application.

Selection of a variety that is not prone to lodging may be a better choice than applying a PGR.

 

Lead research organisation Birchip Cropping Group
Host research organisation Irrigated Cropping Council
Trial funding source GRDC BDW00024
Related program Maintaining profitable farming systems with retained stubble
Acknowledgments N/A
Other trial partners Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop type Cereal (Grain): Barley
Treatment type(s)
  • Crop : Variety
  • Growth regulator : Type
  • Sowing : Rate
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Replicated

Kerang 2017

Sow rate or Target density High: 220 plants/m2, Low: 140 plants/m2
Sowing machinery

John Shearer 10 row linkage

7 inch row spacing

Baker boots

Chain harrows

Sow date 9 May 2017
Harvest date 29 November 2017 Late November
Plot size 15m x 1.42m
Plot replication 3
Fertiliser

125 kg DAP at sowing

95 kg urea/ha Aug 2

105 kg urea/ha Aug 20

 

Herbicide

1.5 l/ha Glyphoste 540 May 7

75 ml/ha Goal May 7

2.5 l/ha Boxer Gold May 9 IBS

750 ml/ha Triathlon July 20

Fungicide

250 ml/ha Tilt Xtra Aug 1

Seed treatment Gaucho 600 200 ml/100 kg
Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information

Download results

Trial results Table 1

# Variety
Treatment 1
Grain yield (t/ha) Retention (%) Screenings (<2.2mm sieve) (%) Plant height (cm) Grain protein (%)
1 Compass Low Pop'n + PGR 9.84 94.9 1.4 63.8 10.5
2 Compass Low Pop'n - PGR 8.73 95.5 1.2 73.7 11.4
3 Compass High Pop'n + PGR 9.47 95 1.3 62.7 10
4 Compass High Pop'n - PGR 9.23 90.4 0.9 71 11
5 LaTrobe Low Pop'n + PGR 9.6 86.7 3.2 63.8 11.7
6 LaTrobe Low Pop'n - PGR 9.63 90.1 2.5 68.3 11.7
7 LaTrobe High Pop'n + PGR 9.61 84.9 3.7 66.7 11.9
8 LaTrobe High Pop'n - PGR 9.74 88.9 2.4 67 11.3
9 Cobra wheat Low Pop'n + PGR 9.58 0.7 69.5 10.4
10 Cobra wheat Low Pop'n - PGR 9.58 1 79.7 10.7
11 Cobra wheat High Pop'n + PGR 9.44 0.8 70.8 10.5
12 Cobra wheat High Pop'n - PGR 9.55 0.8 79 10.6

Grain yield t/ha


Loading

Grain protein %


Loading

Plant height cm


Loading

Retention %


Loading

Screenings (<2.2mm sieve) %


Loading
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Not specified
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Kerang, VIC Grey clay
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
Kerang, VIC Vertosol
Soil Moisture Source: BOM/ANU
Average amount of water stored in the soil profile during the year, estimated by the OzWALD model-data fusion system.
Year Kerang VIC
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000

Climate

Kerang VIC 2017


Observed climate information

Rainfall avg ann (mm) 375mm
Rainfall avg gsr (mm) 232mm
Rainfall trial total (mm) 425mm
Rainfall trial gsr (mm) 220mm

Derived climate information

Kerang VIC

Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.

Trial report and links

2017 trial report



Trial last modified: 06-12-2021 10:27am AEST