Management of soilborne Rhizoctonia disease risk in cereal crops

2011

Research organisation
Funding source

Trial details

Researcher(s) Amanda Cook (SARDI)
Vadakattu Gupta (CSIRO)
Nady Harris (CSIRO)
Alan McKay (SARDI)
Kathy Ophel (Keller (SARDI))
Ian Richter (CSIRO)
David Roget (Keller (SARDI))
Wade Shepperd (CSIRO)
Daniel Smith (CSIRO)
Year(s) 2011
Contributor CSIRO - Waite Campus
Trial location(s) Streaky Bay, SA
Management of soilborne Rhizoctonia disease risk in cereal crops locations
Aims

To improve long term control of Rhizoctonia by increasing the understanding of the interactions between disease inoculum and natural soil suppressive activity and to improve the prediction and management of the disease.

Key messages
  • Grass free canola and pasture reduce Rhizoctonia inoculum levels and can provide effective control of Rhizoctonia for a following cereal crop.
  • The cereal yield benefits from previous rotation crops were higher in 2011 compared to 2010 as a result of higher Rhizoctonia inoculum levels at sowing in 2011.
  • Cereals (and grasses) are the main hosts for Rhizoctonia and result in the rapid build up of inoculum.
  • Rhizoctonia inoculum is reduced following rainfall after crop maturity but levels can recover during dry periods over summer/autumn.
  • Following a wet summer (multiple rainfall events), levels of Rhizoctonia inoculum can be reduced from high risk to low risk.
  • Rhizoctonia inoculum levels at sowing were significantly lower in cultivation treatments compared to notill however in the trials to date, the decline in inoculum with cultivation has not been sufficient to provide a yield benefit.
Lead research organisation CSIRO - Waite Campus
Host research organisation N/A
Trial funding source GRDC
Related program Eyre Peninsula Farming Systems
Acknowledgments
  • Thank you to GRDC for funding this project. Thanks to the Williams and Goosay families for allowing us to have trials on their property.
  • Amicide 625 - registered trademark of Nufarm, Broadstrike - registered trademark of Dow Agrosciences, Hammer - registered trademark of Crop Care, Karate Zeon - registered trademark of Syngenta, Hoegrass - registered trademark of Bayer Crop Science

Other trial partners Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop types Oilseed: Canola Cereal (Grain): Wheat Pasture: Medic
Treatment type(s)
  • Crop : Type
  • Soil Improvement : Type
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Replicated

Streaky Bay 2011 Canola

Sow rate or Target density 5 kg/ha
Sow date 19 May 2011
Harvest date Unknown
Plot size 60m x 1.4m
Plot replication 4
Fertiliser

Cobbler canola was sown with MAP @ 150 kg/ha, and urea @ 70 kg/ha was broadcast shortly after
germination.

Herbicide

The trial area received 1.5 L/ha of glyphosate, 1.5 L/ha of trifluralin and 10 ml/ha Hammer® pre-seeding.

Post sowing 1.5 L/ha of Hoegrass® was used for grass control in all plots

Insecticide

On 21 June the trial received 30 ml/ha Karate Zeon® for diamond back moth control

Streaky Bay 2011 Wheat

Sow rate or Target density 70 kg/ha
Sow date 19 May 2011
Harvest date Unknown
Plot size 60m x 1.4m
Plot replication 4
Fertiliser

Correll wheat was sown with DAP @ 60 kg/ha and urea @ 35 kg/ha.

Herbicide

The trial area received 1.5 L/ha of glyphosate, 1.5 L/ha of trifluralin and 10 ml/ha Hammer® pre-seeding.

Post sowing 1.1 L/ha of Amicide 625® in the wheat plots for broadleaf control.

Insecticide

On 21 June the trial received 30 ml/ha Karate Zeon® for diamond back moth control

Streaky Bay 2011 Medic

Sow rate or Target density 2.5 kg/ha
Sow date 19 May 2011
Harvest date Unknown
Plot size 60m x 1.4m
Plot replication 4
Fertiliser

Herald Medic was sown with MAP @ 35 kg/ha.

Herbicide

The trial area received 1.5 L/ha of glyphosate, 1.5 L/ha of trifluralin and 10 ml/ha Hammer® pre-seeding.

Post sowing, the medic plots received Broadstrike® at 25 g/ha.

Insecticide

On 21 June the trial received 30 ml/ha Karate Zeon® for diamond back moth control

Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information
Trial source data and summary not available
Check the trial report PDF for trial results.
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Not specified
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Streaky Bay, SA Not specified
Derived trial site soil information
Soil Moisture Source: BOM/ANU
Average amount of water stored in the soil profile during the year, estimated by the OzWALD model-data fusion system.
Year Streaky Bay SA
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000

Climate

Derived climate information

No observed climate data available for this trial.
Derived climate data is determined from trial site location and national weather sources.

Streaky Bay SA

Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.

Trial report and links

2011 trial report



Trial last modified: 16-01-2026 20:52pm AEST