Joel Andrew (Map IQ) Nathan Dovey (Stirling to Coast Farmers) Josh Goad (A.D) Tony Goad (A.D) Jeremy Lemon (DPRID)
Year(s)
2016 - 2018
Contributor
agVivo
Trial location(s)
Kojaneerup, WA
Aims
To assess the yield response to deep ripping depth on a productive sand plain near Kojaneerup, WA.
Key messages
Removing soil compaction increased barley yield by between 710kg/ha and 1,130kg/ha in 2016.
Very deep ripping (1200mm) gave the greatest yield increases at this site though there are factors that may inhibit the ability to rip this deep on a large scale.
Lead research organisation
agVivo
Host research organisation
N/A
Trial funding source
GRDC AVP00003-A
Related program
N/A
Acknowledgments
The research undertaken as part of this project is made possible by the significant contributions of Josh and Tony Goad who setup and hosted the trial with support from Jeremy Lemon of Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development and the GRDC. A further thank you to Jeremy Lemon for processing and access to the trial yield data. This assessment of the trial and report is funded by the GRDC through the Albany Region Cropping Solution Network.
GRDC Project Number: AVP00003-A
Trial results Table 1: Average crop yield per treatment
#
Treatment 1
Grain yield (t/ha)
1
█
Nil
5.8
2
█
Rip_350mm
5.9
3
█
Rip_700mm
6.54
4
█
Rip_1200mm
6.98
Grain yield t/ha
Trial results Table 2: Average crop yield in 2017
#
Treatment 1
Grain yield (t/ha)
1
█
Nil
1.76
2
█
Rip_350mm
1.75
3
█
Rip_700mm
1.76
4
█
Rip_1200mm
1.84
Grain yield t/ha
Trial results Table 3: Average soil resistance for ripped and control plots
#
Treatment 1
Soil strength (kPa)
Soil loosening depth (cm)
1
█
Rip_350mm
567
-5
2
█
Rip_350mm
1005
-10
3
█
Rip_350mm
1749
-15
4
█
Rip_350mm
1750
-20
5
█
Rip_350mm
1847
-25
6
█
Rip_350mm
2054
-30
7
█
Rip_350mm
2750
-35
8
█
Rip_350mm
2676
-40
9
█
Rip_350mm
2697
-45
10
█
Rip_350mm
2573
-50
11
█
Rip_350mm
2433
-55
12
█
Rip_350mm
2450
-60
13
█
Rip_350mm
2500
-65
14
█
Control
160
-5
15
█
Control
639
-10
16
█
Control
824
-15
17
█
Control
953
-20
18
█
Control
1164
-25
19
█
Control
1510
-30
20
█
Control
1746
-35
21
█
Control
1890
-40
22
█
Control
1874
-45
23
█
Control
1978
-50
24
█
Control
2452
-55
25
█
Control
2467
-60
26
█
Control
2370
-65
27
█
Control
2449
-70
28
█
Barrier
2500
-5
29
█
Barrier
2500
-10
30
█
Barrier
2500
-15
31
█
Barrier
2500
-20
32
█
Barrier
2500
-25
33
█
Barrier
2500
-30
34
█
Barrier
2500
-35
35
█
Barrier
2500
-40
36
█
Barrier
2500
-45
37
█
Barrier
2500
-50
38
█
Barrier
2500
-55
39
█
Barrier
2500
-60
40
█
Barrier
2500
-65
41
█
Barrier
2500
-70
42
█
Rip_700mm
466
-5
43
█
Rip_700mm
973
-10
44
█
Rip_700mm
1232
-15
45
█
Rip_700mm
1460
-20
46
█
Rip_700mm
1520
-25
47
█
Rip_700mm
1559
-30
48
█
Rip_700mm
1569
-35
49
█
Rip_700mm
1747
-40
50
█
Rip_700mm
1844
-45
51
█
Rip_700mm
1859
-50
52
█
Rip_700mm
1780
-55
53
█
Rip_700mm
1698
-60
54
█
Rip_700mm
1700
-65
55
█
Rip_700mm
1702
-70
56
█
Rip_1200mm
460
-5
57
█
Rip_1200mm
682
-10
58
█
Rip_1200mm
793
-15
59
█
Rip_1200mm
794
-20
60
█
Rip_1200mm
803
-25
61
█
Rip_1200mm
818
-30
62
█
Rip_1200mm
744
-35
63
█
Rip_1200mm
768
-40
64
█
Rip_1200mm
775
-45
65
█
Rip_1200mm
896
-50
66
█
Rip_1200mm
1032
-55
67
█
Rip_1200mm
1229
-60
68
█
Rip_1200mm
1229
-65
69
█
Rip_1200mm
1200
-70
Trial results Table 4: Bulk density of soil from each plot was calculated across the trial area.
#
Treatment 1
20cm Bulk Density ((g/cm3))
10cm Bulk Density ((g/cm3))
30cm Bulk density (g/cm3)
50cm Bulk Density (g/cm3)
1
█
Nil
1.53
1.01
1.43
1.63
2
█
Rip_350mm
1.37
0.96
1.32
1.55
3
█
Rip_700mm
1.38
0.92
1.42
1.55
4
█
Rip_1200mm
1.28
0.95
1.29
1.26
10cm Bulk Density (g/cm3)
20cm Bulk Density (g/cm3)
30cm Bulk density g/cm3
50cm Bulk Density g/cm3
Trial results Table 5: Economic return of each treatment show varied results across the ripping depths and seasons
#
Treatment 1
Return on investment compared to control ($/ha)
Net 2-year benefit ($/ha)
Net 3-year benefit ($/ha)
Treatment Cost ($/ha)
Net 1-year benefit ($/ha)
1
█
Control
0
Â
0
-
0
2
█
Rip 350mm
1
-10
26
40
25
3
█
Rip 700mm
128
0
10
60
178
4
█
Rip 1200mm
89
35
-28
200
283
Net 1-year benefit $/ha
Net 2-year benefit $/ha
Net 3-year benefit $/ha
Return on investment compared to control $/ha
Treatment Cost $/ha
Trial results Table 6: Average yield response by production zone
#
Treatment 1
Treatment 2
Grain yield (t/ha)
1
█
Nil
█
Low Production
3.39
2
█
Rip_350mm
█
Low Production
4.06
3
█
Rip_700mm
█
Low Production
3.73
4
█
Rip_1200mm
█
Low Production
3.84
5
█
Nil
█
High Production
5.68
6
█
Rip_350mm
█
High Production
5.41
7
█
Rip_700mm
█
High Production
5.48
8
█
Rip_1200mm
█
High Production
5.38
Grain yield t/ha
Climate
Derived climate information
No observed climate data available for this trial. Derived climate data is
determined from trial site location and national weather sources.
Kojaneerup WA
SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to
construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol
16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.
Trial report and links
Project Final Report
2017 trial report
2017 trial report
GRDC Final Report
AVP00003-A
Searching GRDC
final reports...
Related Final Reports Referencing GRDC code
Searching
GRDC final reports...
Related Final Reports By Crop type and Region
Oilseed CanolaWestern
Searching GRDC
final reports...
Related Final Reports By Author(s)
Joel Andrew, Nathan Dovey, Josh Goad, Tony Goad, Jeremy Lemon