New Australian soybean variety Richmond outperforms traditional varieties, Asgrow A6785 and Soya 791 - Exp 1

2006 - 2009, 2014 - 2016

Research organisation
Funding source

Trial details

Researcher(s) Sam Blanch (NSW DPI)
Nathan Ensbey (NSW DPI)
Andrew James (CSIRO)
Natalie Moore (NSW DPI)
Stephen Morris (NSW DPI)
Year(s) 2006 - 2009, 2014 - 2016
Contributor Department of Primary Industries NSW
Trial location(s) Grafton, NSW
Further information View external link
New Australian soybean variety Richmond outperforms traditional varieties, Asgrow A6785 and Soya 791 - Exp 1 locations
Aims

The Australian Soybean Breeding Program develops varieties for diverse production environments across a 3000 km range from the Atherton Tablelands in far north Queensland (Latitude 17.2661°S, Longitude 145.4859°E) to the Riverina in southern New South Wales (Latitude 29.7503°S, Longitude 120.5530°E).

The program focuses on strategies to broaden the range of adaptation of new cultivars (James & Lawn, 2011), and to complete the transition from traditional dark hilum types that supply lower-value crushing markets to clear hilum types with the grain qualities required for human consumption markets. Advances in yield, disease resistance and other agronomic traits are also targeted.

Primarily, a single seed descent method is used to advance populations to the F4 level of inbreeding. Varieties from the Australian Soybean Breeding Program are not genetically modified (non-GMO). Regional evaluation and selection for environmental adaptation and specific regional traits is carried out across a wide range of environments in the target production regions. Typically, new soybean lines progress through stages of small-scale replicated evaluations for 6–8 seasons, with processors conducting small-scale grain evaluations. Advanced lines then complete evaluation in replicated on-farm experiments before commercial licensing and release.

This paper summarises data from multi-season replicated evaluations and on-farm experiments of RichmondA, a new variety for production in northern New South Wales

Key messages
  • Richmond produced an average yield 7% higher than Soya 791 in advanced variety evaluations at early sowing dates (first week in December) over six seasons.
  • Richmond produced an average yield 7.7% higher than Asgrow A6785 in advanced variety evaluations at late sowing dates (mid January) over eight seasons.
  • In on-farm experiments, Richmond yielded 16% higher than Soya 791 in a wide-row system on the northern slopes, and 7% higher than Asgrow A6785 in a narrow-row coastal system.
  • In addition to higher yield potential, Richmond is tolerant to lodging and pre-harvest weather damage, has clean leaf drop, large seed size and high protein, and is resistant to powdery mildew. This combination of traits provides greater crop security and a full range of market options for growers, and high quality grain for buyers and processors.

Conclusions:

The Australian soybean variety RichmondA produces large grain (22 g/100 seed) with a clear hilum and high levels of protein (42% dry matter), which is suitable for all markets including human consumption and export. The traditional variety, Asgrow A6785, has small grain (<16 g/100 seed) with a brown hilum and protein levels less than 40%, which limits the range of markets to which it is suited. The traditional variety, Soya 791, has average sized grain Agronomy(19 g/100 seed) with a light brown hilum and high levels of protein (42%). Both A6785 and Soya 791 are prone to excessive vegetative growth, especially at an early sowing date. However, this is not necessarily converted into grain yield as demonstrated in the on-farm experiment at Harwood.

RichmondA is superior to A6785 and Soya 791 in terms of grain yield, tolerance to lodging, tolerance to pre-harvest weathering and clean leaf drop. RichmondA offers a summer legume option with high yield and high grain quality for early, mid or late sowing windows in northern New South Wales. The variety’s performance was not adversely affected by the range of soil types and farming systems reported in this paper; it was superior to A6785 and Soya 791 in all situations. RichmondA is resistant to powdery mildew. This package of traits represents a significant advance in soybean varieties for the North Coast, Tablelands, Northern Slopes and Liverpool Plains production regions of northern New South Wales.

The results of the on-farm experiment of RichmondA versus Soya 791 in a wide spacing, single row system at Oakwood demonstrates the variety’s ability to compensate for wide rows and the associated lower plant populations in dryland systems. Row spacing and plant population interactions of new soybean and mungbean varieties are being investigated in the current NSW DPI–GRDC project DAN00171

Lead research organisation Department of Primary Industries NSW
Host research organisation N/A
Trial funding source GRDC CSP00157
Related program Australian Soybean Breeding Program
Acknowledgments

The Australia soybean breeding program (CSP00157) is a joint investment by NSW DPI, CSIRO and GRDC. Technical assistance from Graeme Doust, Rodney Ellem, Craig Chapman and Kirran Ensbey is gratefully acknowledged. Assistance from Brad Schwark and Tim McMahon in conducting on-farm experiments is gratefully acknowledged.


Other trial partners CSIRO, GRDC
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop type Oilseed: Soybean
Treatment type(s)
  • Crop : Variety
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Blocked

Grafton 2006

Sow rate or Target density 360,000 plants/ha
Sow date Early season varieties between 2 and 5 December; late season varieties between 11 and 13 January
Harvest date The abovementioned sowing dates typically resulted in the harvest of early-sown variety experiments
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified
Herbicide

Weed management typically included a post-plant pre-emergent application of glyphosate at a rate of 1 L/ha with Dual Gold (960 g/L S-metolachlor) at 1 L/ha. Spinnaker 700 WDG (700 g/kg imazethapyr) was applied 2–3 weeks after emergence at 100 g/ha. Verdict 520 (520 g/L haloxyfop present as the haloxyfop-R methyl ester) was only applied at 150 mL/ha if required before canopy closure.

Insecticide

Bug checking was conducted at regular intervals and an integrated pest management approach followed to conserve as many beneficial insects as possible. The following insecticides were used if required (note that not all insecticides were applied to all experiments in all seasons):

  • ViVUS MAX (5 × 109 nucleopolyhedro virus of Helicoverpa armigera per mL) at 150 mL/ha to control Helicoverpa
  • Dipel SC (Bacillus thuringiensis subsp kurstaki ABTS-351) at 4 L/ha to control soybean looper
  • Pirimor WG (pirimicarb 500 g/kg) at 500 g/ha to control only widespread or severe infestations of soybean aphid
  • Wizard 18 (abamectin 18 g/L) at 300 mL/ha to control mites
  • Altacor (350 g/kg chlorantraniliprole) at 70 g/ha to control s
Fungicide

If required, Folicur 430SC (430 g/L tebuconazol) was applied at 245 mL/ha to manage soybean leaf rust.

Grafton 2007

Sow rate or Target density Not specified
Sow date Not specified
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified
Herbicide Not specified
Insecticide Not specified
Fungicide Not specified

Grafton 2008

Sow rate or Target density Not specified
Sow date Not specified
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified
Herbicide Not specified
Insecticide Not specified
Fungicide Not specified

Grafton 2009

Sow rate or Target density Not specified
Sow date Not specified
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified
Herbicide Not specified
Insecticide Not specified
Fungicide Not specified

Grafton 2014

Sow rate or Target density Not specified
Sow date Not specified
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified
Herbicide Not specified
Insecticide Not specified
Fungicide Not specified

Grafton 2015

Sow rate or Target density Not specified
Sow date Not specified
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified
Herbicide Not specified
Insecticide Not specified
Fungicide Not specified

Grafton 2016

Sow rate or Target density Not specified
Sow date Not specified
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified
Herbicide Not specified
Insecticide Not specified
Fungicide Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information

Download results

Trial results Soybean variety evaluations, early sowing window for 6 seasons between 2008-09 and 2014-15

# Variety
Protein (%) Grain yield (t/ha) Lodging (0-9) Plant height (cm) Days to maturity (GS90) (no. of days) Weathering tolerance (% unweathered grain) Seed number per kg (seeds/kg) Seed size ((g/100 seeds @ 12% moisture))
1 Richmond 42.3 4.6 1.5 85 131 73.7 4532 22.1
2 Moonbi 42.6 4.1 1.6 91 121 72.5 4580 21.8
3 Zeus - - - - - 84.1 - -
4 Soya 5.32 4.3 2.9 99 139 53.2 5217 19.2

Grain yield t/ha


Loading

Days to maturity (GS90) no. of days


Loading

Lodging 0-9


Loading

Plant height cm


Loading

Protein %


Loading

Seed number per kg seeds/kg


Loading

Seed size (g/100 seeds @ 12% moisture)


Loading

Weathering tolerance % unweathered grain


Loading
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Not specified
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Grafton, NSW Not specified
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
Grafton, NSW Kurosol
Soil Moisture Source: BOM/ANU
Average amount of water stored in the soil profile during the year, estimated by the OzWALD model-data fusion system.
Year Grafton NSW
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000

Climate

Derived climate information

No observed climate data available for this trial.
Derived climate data is determined from trial site location and national weather sources.

Grafton NSW

CAUTION: Trial site locality unknown; Climate data sourced from Department of Primary Industries NSW office location
Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.

Trial report and links

2006 trial report



Trial last modified: 30-07-2019 09:32am AEST