The information contained in this publication is based on knowledge and understanding at the time of writing (July 2016). However, because of advances in knowledge, users are reminded of the need to ensure that the information upon which they rely is up to date and to check the currency of the information with the appropriate officer of NSW Department of Industry, Skills and Regional Development or the user’s independent adviser. The product trade names in this publication are supplied on the understanding that no preference between equivalent products is intended and that the inclusion of a product name does not imply endorsement by the department over any equivalent product from another manufacturer. Recognising that some of the information in this document is provided by third parties, the State of New South Wales, the author and the publisher take no responsibility for the accuracy, currency, reliability and correctness of any information included in the document provided by third parties.
Researcher(s) |
Sean Bithell (NSW DPI) Gail Chiplin (NSW DPI) Steven Harden (NSW DPI) Kristy Hobson (NSW DPI) Lisa Kelly (DAFQ) Kris King (DAFQ) Willy Martin (DAFQ) Kevin Moore (NSW DPI) |
---|---|
Year(s) | 2014 - 2015 |
Contributor | Department of Primary Industries NSW |
Trial location(s) |
Warwick, QLD
|
Further information | View external link |
To evaluate a range of varieties and advanced PBA breeding lines.
Phytophthora medicaginis, the cause of phytophthora root rot (PRR) of chickpea is endemic and widespread in southern QLD and northern NSW, where it carries over from season to season on infected chickpea volunteers, lucerne, native medics and as resistant structures (oospores) in the soil. Although registered for use on chickpeas, metalaxyl seed treatment is expensive, does not provide season-long protection and is not recommended. There are no in-crop control measures for PRR and reducing losses from the disease are based on avoiding risky paddocks and choosing the right variety.
Detailed information on control of PRR in chickpea is available at:
http://www.pulseaus.com.au/growing-pulses/bmp/chickpea/phytophthora-root-rot
Current commercial varieties differ in their resistance to P. medicaginis (Pm), with Yorker and PBA HatTrick having the best resistance and are rated MR (historically Yorker has been slightly better than PBA HatTrick), while Jimbour is MS - MR, Flipper and Kyabra are MS and PBA Boundary has the lowest resistance (S).
From 2007 to 2015 PRR yield loss trials at the DAF Qld Hermitage research Facility, Warwick QLD have evaluated a range of varieties and advanced PBA breeding lines.
Key findings:
Summary
Under conditions that are highly conducive to PRR, substantial (94%) yield losses occur in susceptible varieties such as PBA Boundary. However, significant losses (68-79%) can also occur in varieties with improved resistance to PRR (PBA HatTrick and Yorker). Crosses between chickpea and wild Cicer species such as the PBA breeding line CICA1328 offer the best resistance to PRR.
Lead research organisation |
Department of Primary Industries NSW |
---|---|
Host research organisation | N/A |
Trial funding source | GRDC DAN00176 |
Trial funding source | DPI NSW |
Trial funding source | Department of Agriculture and Fisheries (Queensland) (DAF QLD) DAQ00186 |
Related program |
Northern NSW integrated disease management |
Acknowledgments |
This research was funded by NSW DPI, DAFQ and GRDC under projects DAN00176: Northern NSW Integrated disease management and DAQ00186: Northern Integrated disease management; we are especially grateful to GRDC for its continued support. Thanks also to Woods Grains, Goondiwindi for planting material for trials and to chemical companies who provided products for research purposes and trial management. |
Other trial partners | Not specified |
Crop type | Grain Legume: Chickpeas |
---|---|
Treatment type(s) |
|
Trial type | Experimental |
Trial design | Replicated |
Sow date | Not specified | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Harvest date | Not specified | ||||
Plot size | Not specified | ||||
Plot replication | Not specified | ||||
Psuedoreplication | Not specified | ||||
Other trial notes |
Disease and yield loss prediction: Yield loss caused by PRR calculation
Variety: PRR protection
|
Sow date | Not specified | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Harvest date | Not specified | ||||
Plot size | Not specified | ||||
Plot replication | Not specified | ||||
Psuedoreplication | Not specified | ||||
Other trial notes |
Disease and yield loss prediction: Yield loss caused by PRR calculation
Variety: PRR protection
|
# | Variety |
Treatment 1
|
Grain yield (t/ha) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | █ CICA1328 | █ Absence of PRR | 2.64 |
2 | █ D06344>F3BREE2AB027 | █ Absence of PRR | 2.52 |
3 | █ BPA HatTrick | █ Absence of PRR | 2.5 |
4 | █ Yorker | █ Absence of PRR | 2.61 |
5 | █ CICA1007 | █ Absence of PRR | 2.93 |
6 | █ CICA0912 | █ Absence of PRR | 2.76 |
7 | █ PBA Boundary | █ Absence of PRR | 2.88 |
8 | █ CICA1328 | █ Presence of PRR | 1.54 |
9 | █ D06344>F3BREE2AB027 | █ Presence of PRR | 1.05 |
10 | █ BPA HatTrick | █ Presence of PRR | 0.81 |
11 | █ Yorker | █ Presence of PRR | 0.57 |
12 | █ CICA1007 | █ Presence of PRR | 0.71 |
13 | █ CICA0912 | █ Presence of PRR | 0.37 |
14 | █ PBA Boundary | █ Presence of PRR | 0.17 |
# | Variety |
Yield loss (%) |
---|---|---|
1 | █ CICA1328 | 41.7 |
2 | █ D06344>F3BREE2AB027 | 58.4 |
3 | █ PBA HatTrick | 67.7 |
4 | █ Yorker | 78.7 |
5 | █ CICA1007 | 75.9 |
6 | █ CICA0912 | 86.6 |
7 | █ PBA Boundary | 94 |
# | Variety |
Treatment 1
|
Grain yield (t/ha) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | █ CICA1328 | █ Absence of PRR | 2.76 |
2 | █ Yorker | █ Absence of PRR | 3.01 |
3 | █ D06344>F3BREE2AB027 | █ Absence of PRR | 2.93 |
4 | █ BPA HatTrick | █ Absence of PRR | 2.94 |
5 | █ CICA0912 | █ Absence of PRR | 3.23 |
6 | █ PBA Boundary | █ Absence of PRR | 2.79 |
7 | █ CICA1328 | █ Presence of PRR | 2.71 |
8 | █ Yorker | █ Presence of PRR | 2.69 |
9 | █ D06344>F3BREE2AB027 | █ Presence of PRR | 2.13 |
10 | █ BPA HatTrick | █ Presence of PRR | 1.98 |
11 | █ CICA0912 | █ Presence of PRR | 1.79 |
12 | █ PBA Boundary | █ Presence of PRR | 0.73 |
# | Variety |
Yield loss (%) |
---|---|---|
1 | █ CICA1328 | 1.8 |
2 | █ Yorker | 10.4 |
3 | █ D06344>F3BREE2AB027 | 27.4 |
4 | █ BPA HatTrick | 32.8 |
5 | █ CICA0912 | 44.6 |
6 | █ PBA Boundary | 73.8 |
SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.