The interaction between the seeding rate and row spacing of hybrid and open pollinated canola (Brassica napus) varieties on annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) growth and seed production

2018

Research organisations
Funding source

Trial details

Researcher(s) Mike Ashworth
Richard Devlin
Suman Rakshit
Roberto Rocha
Rebecca Smith
Year(s) 2018
Contributor School of Agriculture and Environment - The University of Western Australia
Trial location(s) , WA
The interaction between the seeding rate and row spacing of hybrid and open pollinated canola (Brassica napus) varieties on annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) growth and seed production locations
Aims

The objective of this study is to determine the optimal combinations of canola cultivar, seeding rate and row spacing on annual ryegrass seed production and canola growth and yield.

Key messages

The results of this study suggest:

  • Increasing the canola seeding rate of both OP and Hybrid varieties increased the crops potential competitiveness by increasing early biomass (NDVI) and % radiation interception.
  • Increasing canola row spacing increased the crops light interception.
  • At Cunderdin, the greatest decrease in ARG establishment in response to canola seeding rate occurred where both OP and Hybrid canola varieties were sown at wider (50cm) row spacing’s.
  • The Mingenew site had a significantly higher weed density, reducing the trials competitive effect on ARG density, biomass, and seed production. Sites with lower weed seed banks will be identified in 2019.

At the Mingenew site, canola yield was higher in open pollinated variety (Bonito). At Cunderdin, no effects were identified.

Lead research organisation Australian Herbicide Resistance Initiative
Host research organisation Australian Herbicide Resistance Initiative
Trial funding source GRDC 9175962
Related program N/A
Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Grains Research Development Corporation of Australia (GRDC).


Other trial partners University of Adelaide
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop types Oilseed: Canola Weed: Ryegrass
Treatment type(s)
  • Crop : Variety
  • Sowing : Rate
  • Sowing : Row Spacing
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Randomised,Replicated,Blocked

2018 Canola

Sow rate or Target density 20, 35 and 50 seeds/m2
Sow date Unknown
Harvest date Unknown
Trial design method RCBD Randomised Complete Block Design
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication 4
Plot randomisation Y
Fertiliser

To ensure optimal canola growth, 70 kg/ha Gusto Gold (Summit Fertilisers Australia, N – 10.2%, P- 13.1%, K- 12%, S- 7.6%, Cu- 0.07%, Zn- 0.14% and Mn- 0.01%) treated with 300ml ha-1 Impact (250 g/L Flutriafol, Cheminova Australia) was  drilled 3cm below the seed to minimise contact with the germinating canola seed with  100kg/ha of Urea (Summit Fertilisers Australia, N – 46%) broadcast evenly on the soil surface immediately after seeding. At the 4-6 leaf stage of the canola, 100L/ha of urea and ammonium nitrate liquid fertiliser (UAN) (Summit fertilisers Australia) (N- 32%) was evenly sprayed across the site to maintain growth. 

Herbicide

Immediately prior to seeding, all experimental areas were treated with 1.5L ha–1 Roundup Ultramax (Glyphosate 540  g/L, Sinochem Australia) and 150ml ha–1 Lontrel (Clopyralid 750g/L, DowAgrosciences Australia) to control all germinated weeds. 

The weed-free treatment was maintained using 1 L/ha Kerb (500 g/L Propyzamide, Dow AgroSciences Australia) incorporated by sowing (IBS), 1.1 kg/ha Atradex (900g/kg Atrazine, Nufarm Australia Limited) IBS followed by 1.1 kg/ha of Atradex and 500 mL/ha Select 

Insecticide

1L of Cruiser Opti [210 g/L Thiamethoxam 37.5 g/L Lambda-Cyhalothrin, Syngenta Australia] and 400 mL/100 kg Maxim XL [25 g/L Fludioxonil 10 g/L Metalaxyl-M Syngenta Australia] applied per 100 kg of seed. 

Fungicide

 400 mL/100 kg Maxim XL [25 g/L Fludioxonil 10 g/L Metalaxyl-M Syngenta Australia] applied per 100 kg of seed

2018 Ryegrass

Sow rate or Target density Not specified
Sow date Not applicable
Harvest date Not applicable
Trial design method RCBD Randomised Complete Block Design
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication 3
Plot randomisation Y
Fertiliser Not specified
Herbicide Not specified
Insecticide Not specified
Fungicide Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information
Trial source data and summary not available
Check the trial report PDF for trial results.
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Not specified
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
, WA Sandy loam
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
, WA Kandosol
Soil Moisture Source: BOM/ANU
Average amount of water stored in the soil profile during the year, estimated by the OzWALD model-data fusion system.
Year WA
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000

Climate

Derived climate information

No observed climate data available for this trial.
Derived climate data is determined from trial site location and national weather sources.

WA

Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.

Trial report and links

2018 trial report



Trial last modified: 09-10-2025 23:56pm AEST