Management of nutrition after rotary cultivation of a non-wetting soil in the Geraldton Port Zone - Eneabba

2018
CC BY 4.0

Research organisation
Funding source

Trial details

Researcher(s) Stephen Davies (DPIRD)
James Easton (CSBP)
Alana Hartley (Liebe)
Year(s) 2018
Contributor Liebe Group
Trial location(s) Eneabba, WA
Related trials
Management of nutrition after rotary cultivation of a non-wetting soil in the Geraldton Port Zone - Eneabba locations
Aims
  • To determine the impact of N and K supply on yield and quality, on ameliorated non-wetting soils in the Geraldton Port Zone.
  • To determine the most effective way to apply nutrients (granular, banded, top dressed or liquid) on non-wetting soils after amelioration, in the Geraldton Port Zone.
     
Key messages
  • Cultivation will often see improved yields in the first two seasons, particularly on lighter soils.
  • The 2018 season saw 409 mm of growing season rainfall (GSR) resulting in a significant response to nitrogen (N) and a response to a residual high potassium (K) applied in 2017.
  • In soils deficient in K (below 40-50mg/kg) at 0-10 cm, application of higher rates of top dressed K to take advantage of the residual benefits across seasons could be considered.
     
Lead research organisation Liebe Group
Host research organisation N/A
Trial funding source GRDC LIE00010-A
Related program N/A
Acknowledgments

Thank you to the Broun family for hosting this site at their Eneabba property. The Liebe Group would also like to acknowledge the project team, including Stephen Davies (DPIRD) and James Easton (CSBP) who helped design this trial and Andrew Van Burgel (DPIRD) for statistical analysis. Thanks are also extended to the field team at Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (DPIRD) Geraldton, for implementation, management and harvesting of this trial.
This project has been supported by the GRDC investment LIE00010-A Best bet management for ameliorated non-wetting soils of the Geraldton Port Zone.
Peer review:  Dr Frances Hoyle, University of Western Australia
 


Other trial partners Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop type Oilseed: Canola
Treatment type(s)
  • Soil Improvement
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Replicated

Eneabba 2018

Sow rate or Target density 1.8 kg/ha (DG 540 RR canola)
Sow date 18 April 2018
Harvest date Unknown
Plot size 1.54m x 20m
Plot replication 4
Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information

Download results

Trial results Implemented nutrient treatments for 2018

# Treatment 1
Banded (kg/ha) Banded (L/ha) Rosette (L/ha) N (mg/kg) P (mg/kg) K (mg/kg) Budding (L/ha)
1 Std N No K 85 Agstar Extra 50 Flexi N 80 Flexi N 70 12 0
2 Std N Std K 100 K-Till Extra 50 Flexi N 80 Flexi N 70 12 11
3 Liquid K 85 Agstar Extra 117 Flexi NK 80 Flexi N 70 12 11
4 Std N High K 100 K-Till Extra/28 50 Flexi N 80 Flexi N 70 12 25
5 No N 62 Big Phos/51 MoP 50 Flexi N 0 12 25
6 Low N 100 K-Till Extra/28 50 Flexi N 31 12 25
7 High N 100 K-Till Extra/28 50 Flexi N 80 Flexi N 100 12 25 71 Flexi N
8 High N No K 85 Agstar Extra 50 Flexi N 80 Flexi N 100 12 0 71 Flexi N
9 Residual High K 85 Agstar Extra 80 Flexi N 70 12 0

Trial results Soil test results Treatment 1, Eneabba, 26th March 2018

# Treatment 1
Organic carbon (%) Colwell phosphorus (mg/kg) Water droplet penetration time (seconds) pH CaCl2 (pH) Electrical conductivity (dS/m) NH4 (mg/kg) NO3 (mg/kg) Depth (cm) Colwell Potassium (mg/kg) PBI (unit) MED (unit)
1 Standard N, No K 0.57 9.5 6.8 6.2 0.072 1 19 0-10 20 7.5 0
2 Standard N, No K 0.69 10 5.9 0.039 1 11 10-20 17 8.6
3 Standard N, No K 0.42 12.5 5.6 0.022 1 6 20-30 15 8.6
4 Standard N, No K 4.9 30-40 24
5 Standard N, No K 5 40-50 24

Colwell phosphorus mg/kg


Loading

Electrical conductivity dS/m


Loading

NH4 mg/kg


Loading

NO3 mg/kg


Loading

Organic carbon %


Loading

pH CaCl2 pH


Loading

Water droplet penetration time seconds


Loading

Trial results Soil test results Treatment 9, Eneabba, 26th March 2018

# Treatment 1
Organic carbon (%) Colwell phosphorus (mg/kg) Water droplet penetration time (seconds) pH CaCl2 (pH) Electrical conductivity (dS/m) NH4 (mg/kg) NO3 (mg/kg) Depth (cm) Colwell Potassium (mg/kg) PBI (unit) MED (unit)
1 Residual High K 0.57 10 6.8 6.2 0.072 1 14 0-10 34 7.5 0
2 Residual High K 0.69 8 6.1 0.039 <1 9 10-20 30 8.6
3 Residual High K 0.42 12 5.4 0.022 1 3 20-30 18 8.6
4 Residual High K 4.9 30-40 19
5 Residual High K 5 40-50 25

Colwell phosphorus mg/kg


Loading

Electrical conductivity dS/m


Loading

NH4 mg/kg


Loading

NO3 mg/kg


Loading

Organic carbon %


Loading

pH CaCl2 pH


Loading

Water droplet penetration time seconds


Loading

Trial results Impact of fertiliser management strategy on 2018 Canola yield

# Treatment 1
Grain yield (t/ha) Applied nitrogen (kg N/ha) Potassium (kg/ha)
1 Std N No K 1.06ab 70 0
2 Std N Std K 1.14bc 70 11
3 Liquid K 1.06ab 70 11
4 Std N High K 1.11ab 70 25
5 No N 0.91a 0 25
6 Low N 0.93ab 31 25
7 High N 1.32cd 100 25
8 High N No K 1.32cd 100 0
9 Residual High K 1.36cd 70 Residual

Grain yield t/ha


Loading

Applied nitrogen kg N/ha


Loading

Potassium kg/ha


Loading

Trial results Impact of fertiliser management strategy on 2018 Canola oil % (ranked lowest to highest)

# Treatment 1
Oil (%) Applied nitrogen (kg N/ha) Potassium (kg/ha)
1 Std N No K 44.7ab 70 0
2 Std N Std K 45.4abc 70 11
3 Liquid K 44.4a 70 11
4 Std N High K 45.6bc 70 25
5 No N 44.6ab 0 25
6 Low N 44.4a 31 25
7 High N 46.0c 100 25
8 High N No K 45.7bc 100 0
9 Residual High K 44.9abc 70 Residual

Applied nitrogen kg N/ha


Loading

Oil %


Loading

Potassium kg/ha


Loading

Trial results Gross margin analysis by treatment

# Treatment 1
Gross margin ($/ha) Oil (%) Grain yield (t/ha) Gross return ($/ha) Applied nitrogen (kg N/ha) Potassium (kg/ha) Phosphorus (kg/ha) Banded (kg/ha) Banded (L/ha) Rosette (L/ha) Budding (L/ha)
1 Std N No K 416 44.7 1.06 574 70 12 0 85 Agstar Extra 50 Flexi N 80 Flexi N
2 Std N Std K 447 45.4 1.14 621 70 12 11 100 K-Till Extra 50 Flexi N 80 Flexi N
3 Liquid K 388 44.4 1.06 571 70 12 11 85 Agstar Extra 117 Flexi NK 80 Flexi N
4 Std N High K 417 45.6 1.11 610 70 12 25 100 K-Till Extra/28 50 Flexi N 80 Flexi N
5 No N 418 44.6 0.91 489 0 12 25 62 Big Phos/51 MoP 50 Flexi N
6 Low N 367 44.4 0.93 503 31 12 25 100 K-Till Extra/28 50 Flexi N 80 Flexi N
7 High N 487 46 1.32 729 100 12 25 100 K-Till Extra/28 54 Flexi N 80 Flexi N 71 Flexi N
8 High N No K 508 45.7 1.33 718 100 12 0 85 Agstar Extra 54 Flexi N 80 Flexi N 71 Flexi N
9 Residual High K 448 44.9 1.36 739 70 12 Residual 85 Agstar Extra 80 Flexi N

Grain yield t/ha


Loading

Applied nitrogen kg N/ha


Loading

Gross margin $/ha


Loading

Gross return $/ha


Loading

Oil %


Loading

Phosphorus kg/ha


Loading

Potassium kg/ha


Loading
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Not specified
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Eneabba, WA Not specified
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
Eneabba, WA Chromosol
Soil Moisture Source: BOM/ANU
Average amount of water stored in the soil profile during the year, estimated by the OzWALD model-data fusion system.
Year Eneabba WA
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000

Climate

Derived climate information

No observed climate data available for this trial.
Derived climate data is determined from trial site location and national weather sources.

Eneabba WA

Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.

Trial report and links

2018 trial report



Trial last modified: 21-12-2022 12:29pm AEST