The information contained in this publication is based on knowledge and understanding at the time of writing (June2018) and may not be accurate, current or complete. The State of New South Wales (including the NSW Department of Industry), the author and the publisher take no responsibility, and will accept no liability, for the accuracy, currency, reliability or correctness of any information included in the document(including material provided by third parties). Readers should make their own inquiries and rely on their own advice when making decisions related to material contained in this publication. The product trade names in this publication are supplied on the understanding that no preference between equivalent products is intended and that the inclusion of a product name does not imply endorsement by the department overany equivalent product from another manufacturer.
| Researcher(s) |
Cameron Copeland Felicity Harris Hugh Kanaley Greg McMahon Hayden Petty |
|---|---|
| Year(s) | 2017 |
| Contributor | Department of Primary Industries NSW |
| Trial location(s) |
Wallendbeen, NSW
|
| Further information | View external link |
To investigate the influence that sowing date had on the phenology, grain yield and quality of 12 wheat genotypes.
• New winter genotypes had different phenology responses compared with current commercial genotypes.
• Frost significantly affected phenology and grain yield responses in 2017.
• The highest grain yields were achieved through various sowing date × variety combinations.
• Best management practice is matching varietal phenology with sowing date, however, pre-flowering phases had a significant influence on grain yield responses.
Twelve wheat genotypes with varying responses to vernalisation and photoperiod were sown on three sowing dates: 28 March, 12 April and 1 May 2017.
| Lead research organisation |
Department of Primary Industries NSW |
|---|---|
| Host research organisation | N/A |
| Trial funding source | GRDC BLG104 |
| Trial funding source | DPI NSW |
| Related program | N/A |
| Acknowledgments |
This experiment was part of the project ‘Optimising grain yield potential of winter cereals in the northern grains region’, BLG104, 2017–20, a joint investment by GRDC and NSW DPI under the Grains Agronomy and Pathology Partnership (GAPP). We sincerely thank Cameron and Sarah Hazlett, 'Braeside', Wallendbeen for hosting the experiment and acknowledge the technical support of Jessica Simpson, Mary Matthews, Dylan Male, Kathleen Bernie and Eliza Anwar. |
| Other trial partners | Not specified |
| Crop type | Cereal (Grain): Wheat |
|---|---|
| Treatment type(s) |
|
| Trial type | Experimental |
| Trial design | Replicated |
| Sow rate or Target density | 140 plants/m2 |
|---|---|
| Sowing machinery |
Direct drilled with DBS tynes spaced at 250 mm using a GPS auto-steer system |
| Sow date | Multiple - please see report |
| Harvest date | Multiple- Please see report |
| Plot size | Not specified |
| Plot replication | Not specified |
| Fertiliser |
80 kg/ha mono-ammonium phosphate (MAP) (sowing) Urea 108 kg/ha (spread 19 May) Urea 108 kg/ha (spread 17 July) |
| Herbicide |
Knockdown: glyphosate (450 g/L) 2 L/ha + Ally® 7 g/ha Pre-emergent: Sakura® 118 g/ha + Logran® 35 g/ha + Avadex® Xtra 1.6 L/ha In-crop: Precept® 500 mL/ha + Lontrel™ 750 SG 40 g/ha (11 July) |
| Fungicide |
Seed treatment: Hombre® Ultra 200 mL/100 kg Flutriafol-treated fertiliser (400 mL/ha) In-crop: Prosaro® 300 mL/ha (11 July) |
| Seed treatment | Hombre® Ultra 200 mL/100 kg |
| Other trial notes |
This research paper is an extract from the publication Southern NSW Research Results 2018, available at |
| # |
Treatment 1
|
Grain yield (t/ha) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | █ ADV08-0008 | 5.53 |
| 2 | █ ADV11-9419 | 5.9 |
| 3 | █ Cutlass | 6.54 |
| 4 | █ EGA Wedgetail | 5.89 |
| 5 | █ LongReach Kittyhawk | 5.56 |
| 6 | █ LPB14-0392 | 5.95 |
| 7 | █ Manning | 5.78 |
| 8 | █ Longsword | 5.82 |
| 9 | █ RGT Accroc | 6.37 |
| 10 | █ Scepter | 6.83 |
| 11 | █ LongReach Trojan | 6.09 |
| 12 | █ V09150-01 | 5.8 |
| # |
Treatment 1
|
Grain yield (t/ha) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | █ ADV08-0008 | 6.16 |
| 2 | █ ADV11-9419 | 7.38 |
| 3 | █ Cutlass | 1.2 |
| 4 | █ EGA Wedgetail | 6.12 |
| 5 | █ LongReach Kittyhawk | 6.69 |
| 6 | █ LPB14-0392 | 4.8 |
| 7 | █ Manning | 6.64 |
| 8 | █ Longsword | 2.87 |
| 9 | █ RGT Accroc | 7.86 |
| 10 | █ Scepter | 0.79 |
| 11 | █ LongReach Trojan | 0.45 |
| 12 | █ V09150-01 | 4.92 |
| # |
Treatment 1
|
Grain yield (t/ha) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | █ ADV08-0008 | 6.56 |
| 2 | █ ADV11-9419 | 6.24 |
| 3 | █ Cutlass | 2.85 |
| 4 | █ EGA Wedgetail | 5.78 |
| 5 | █ LongReach Kittyhawk | 6.18 |
| 6 | █ LPB14-0392 | 6.57 |
| 7 | █ Manning | 6.32 |
| 8 | █ Longsword | 4.678 |
| 9 | █ RGT Accroc | 6.36 |
| 10 | █ Scepter | 2.34 |
| 11 | █ LongReach Trojan | 3.96 |
| 12 | █ V09150-01 | 6.03 |
| # |
Treatment 1
|
Grain yield (t/ha) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | █ ADV08-0008 | 5.53 |
| 2 | █ ADV11-9419 | 5.9 |
| 3 | █ Cutlass | 6.54 |
| 4 | █ EGA Wedgetail | 5.89 |
| 5 | █ LongReach Kittyhawk | 5.56 |
| 6 | █ LPB14-0392 | 5.95 |
| 7 | █ Manning | 5.78 |
| 8 | █ Longsword | 5.82 |
| 9 | █ RGT Accroc | 6.37 |
| 10 | █ Scepter | 6.83 |
| 11 | █ LongReach Trojan | 6.09 |
| 12 | █ V09150-01 | 5.8 |
| Rainfall avg gsr (mm) | 370mm |
|---|---|
| Rainfall trial gsr (mm) | 279mm |
SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.
Plant Breeders’ Rights (PBR)
Some crop varieties used in research trials may be covered by Plant Breeders' Rights (PBR). Users should confirm PBR status of relevant varieties by searching the IP Australia PBR database, http://pericles.ipaustralia.gov.au/pbr_db/ or Variety Central (http://varietycentral.com.au/) and contacting variety owners for further information if required. Where possible, varieties have been listed according to their registered PBR name, although OFT cannot and does not guarantee that the information is accurate or complete.
Note that PBR cover is administered through the Plant Breeders’ Right Act 1994 (