Eyespot Management

2016
CC BY 4.0

Research organisaton

Trial details

Researcher(s) Margaret Evans (SARDI)
Hugh Wallwork (SARDI)
Contact email marg.evans@sa.gov.au; hugh.wall- work@sa.gov.au,
Year(s) 2016
Contributor MacKillop Farm Management Group
Trial location(s) Kangaroo Inn, SA
Eyespot Management locations
Aims

This research was initiated to provide preliminary data to improve our understanding of:
• The effectiveness of timing of fungicide application for eyespot management in the South East.
• Interactions between MS and S varieties and fungicide efficacy.
• Impact of fungicides, varieties and combinations on eyespot inoculum carryover.

Key messages

• This is the first quantitative information we have for the effects of varietal resistance and fungicide application and timing on eyespot expression and crop yield in the South East. These preliminary recommendations will become more robust as we gather more information.
• No fungicides are registered at present for eyespot management, but it is anticipated at least one registered product will be available for use in the 2017 season. Applying fungicides for eyespot management reduced eyespot expression and increased yields in the trials at Kangaroo Inn.
• Select more resistant varieties – untreated they will perform better and they may also be more responsive to fungicide application, particularly where disease pressure is high.
• Delays in fungicide application until after early stem elongation (recommended timing, as the canopy is still open enough to allow good coverage of the stem bases) may reduce eyespot incidence and severity but may not give a yield response.

Lead research organisation N/A
Host research organisation N/A
Related program N/A
Acknowledgments

Thanks to Richard Kirkland and family for providing a trial site on their property at Kangaroo Inn and to Amanda Pearce, Matthew
Hoskings, Ian Ludwig and the SARDI New Variety Agronomy team at Struan for managing the site, applying the fungicides, changing
spore trap tapes and helping with sample collection.


Other trial partners Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop type Cereal (Grain): Wheat
Treatment type(s)
  • Fungicide: Application Method
  • Fungicide: Timing
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Replicated

Kangaroo Inn 2016

Sow date Not specified
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information
Trial source data and summary not available
Check the trial report PDF for trial results.
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Not specified
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Kangaroo Inn, SA Not specified
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
Kangaroo Inn, SA Vertosol
Soil Moisture Source: BOM/ANU
Average amount of water stored in the soil profile during the year, estimated by the OzWALD model-data fusion system.
Year Kangaroo Inn SA
2016 455.4mm
2015 456.5mm
2014 491.0mm
2013 485.6mm
2012 503.3mm
2011 518.7mm
2010 480.7mm
2009 448.3mm
2008 401.8mm
2007 406.5mm
2006 438.0mm
2005 478.9mm
2004 468.8mm
2003 470.5mm
2002 444.7mm
2001 494.5mm
2000 491.5mm
National soil grid Source: CSIRO/TERN
NOTE: National Soil Grid data is aggregated information for background information on the wider area
Actual soil values can vary significantly in a small area and the trial soil tests are the most relevant data where available

Soil properties

Loading

Climate

Derived climate information

No observed climate data available for this trial.
Derived climate data is determined from trial site location and national weather sources.

Kangaroo Inn SA

Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.

Trial report and links

2016 trial report



Trial last modified: 23-11-2021 13:23pm AEST