Researcher(s) |
Sjaan Davey Ian Richter Nigel Wilhelm |
---|---|
Year(s) | 2019 |
Contributor | SARDI Minnipa Agricultural Centre |
Trial location(s) |
Minnipa, SA
|
Soil testing for N, P, K and S is a key strategy for monitoring soil fertility of cropping soils as well as for refining fertiliser application strategies for future crops. For this to be successful, the relationship between the soil test and likely response to applied nutrients needs to be well calibrated. Many of these calibrations were developed from fertiliser trials conducted over 20 years ago and have provided robust guidelines on many soil types, but mostly for cereals. Since these trials were conducted cropping systems have changed significantly and altered the face of soil fertility in the Australian grains industry. A detailed re-examination of those existing guidelines is needed to ensure they are still relevant in current farming systems.
As part of the GRDC funded MPCN2 (More Profit from Crop Nutrition) program, a review of data in the Better Fertilizer Decisions for Cropping (BFDC) database showed gaps exist for key crops, soils and regions. Most of these gaps relate to crops that are (i) new to cropping regions or are a low proportion of cropped area, i.e. break crops, (ii) emerging nutrient constraints that had previously been adequate in specific soil types and (iii) issues associated with changing nutrient profile distribution. This project (UQ00082) is closing gaps in the BFDC database using replicated trials. Trials have been established on sites selected for nutrient responses and run over multiple years to develop soil test-crop response relationships. By using wheat as a benchmark alongside a break crop, we should be able to extend the relevance of the guidelines beyond the conditions at the trial site.
Paddock history 2018: Wheat before canola, canola before wheat trial 2017: Pasture 2016: Pasture 2015: Pasture
Soil type Red sandy clay loam
Soil test pH(H20) 8.4, PBI 79, K 523 mg/kg
Plot size 20 m x 2 m x 4 reps x 25.5 cm row spacing
Trial design Completely randomised design, 2 bays deep x 44 plots long x crop type (wheat or canola)
Yield limiting factors Low rainfall, frost
Lead research organisation |
South Australian Research and Development Institute |
---|---|
Host research organisation |
SARDI Minnipa Agricultural Centre |
Trial funding source | GRDC UQ00082 |
Related program | N/A |
Acknowledgments |
Mike Bell (The University of Queensland) who leads the UQ00082 project funded by GRDC. Thank you to Neil King, Katrina Brands, Steve Jeffs and Bradley Hutchings for undertaking the field work and processing samples |
Other trial partners | SARDI Waite Campus |
Crop types | Oilseed: Canola Cereal (Grain): Wheat |
---|---|
Treatment type(s) |
|
Trial type | Experimental |
Trial design | Randomised |
Sow date | Not applicable |
---|---|
Harvest date | Not applicable |
Plot size | 20m x 2m |
Plot replication | 4 |
Psuedoreplication | Not specified |
Plot blocking | Random |
Sow date | Not specified |
---|---|
Harvest date | Not specified |
Plot size | Not specified |
Plot replication | Not specified |
Psuedoreplication | Not specified |
Plot blocking | Not specified |
SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.