| Researcher(s) |
Claire Browne Ben Fleet Gurjeet Gill Kate Maddern |
|---|---|
| Contact email | gurjeet.gill@adelaide.edu.au |
| Contact phone | 08 83137744 |
| Year(s) | 2019 |
| Contributor | School of Agriculture, Food and Wine - The University of Adelaide |
| Trial location(s) |
Birchip, VIC, VIC
|
The aim of this experiment was to determine the effect of sowing time, barley density and herbicides on brome grass control.
Spartacus CL barley was used in this trial to enable the use of Intervix® for post-emergence control of brome grass. In 2019, the trial site received 181 mm rainfall during the growing season (April-October), which was 23% lower than the long-term average for the site. However in December 2018, the site received a heavy downpour of 199 mm, which created good growing conditions for barley crop grown in 2019. In this trial, barley seeding rate did not have a significant effect on either yield (P=0.213), brome panicles/m2 at maturity (P=0.889) or brome seed set/m2 (P=0.409). This lack of effect of crop seed rate on the number of brome panicles and seed set could be related to the high plant available water during the crop and weed life-cycle or due to Spartacus being a less competitive barley cultivar due to its erect architecture. Time of sowing had a significant effect on brome panicles/m2 at maturity and brome seed set/m2. TOS 2 had a lower brome panicle density at maturity than TOS 1 across all herbicide strategies, which was most likely due to low pre-sowing weed kill in TOS 1 as brome grass had not yet germinated. However, brome population that had germinated after the opening rains was killed by glyphosate application prior to seeding barley in TOS 2. As the numbers of panicles were lower in TOS 2, brome seed set was also reduced in TOS2 relative to TOS 1. Herbicide strategy had a significant effect on barley grain yield. As the herbicides reduced the impact of brome on barley, its yield increased from 3.24 t/ha in the knockdown treatment (NIL), to 3.72 t/ha in the pre-emergent herbicides only and to 3.96 t/ha when the pre-emergent herbicides were followed by post-emergent Intervix. Somewhat surprisingly, TOS 2 produced higher yields than TOS 1 across all the treatments, with the greatest difference being 0.46 t/ha in the Nil herbicide treatments. However, the yield difference between the two times of sowing decreased when more effective herbicides were used (0.08t/ha difference between TOS 1 and 2 in pre-emergent only and 0.04t/ha difference when pre-emergent herbicides followed by Intervix). Higher barley grain yield in the later sown crop is most likely due to a significantly greater weed density in barley in TOS 1 than in TOS 2, as large numbers of early germinating brome plants were controlled with glyphosate knockdown in TOS 2. TOS 1 also experienced a mild frost during flowering, resulting in patchy frost damage. Furthermore, May 23 (TOS 2) sowing date still falls within the optimum sowing window for Spartacus, which is an early maturity variety, and TOS 1 on April 29 was earlier than optimum for this variety.
| Lead research organisation |
School of Agriculture, Food and Wine - The University of Adelaide |
|---|---|
| Host research organisation |
Birchip Cropping Group |
| Trial funding source | GRDC 9175134 |
| Related program | N/A |
| Acknowledgments |
GRDC for providing funds for this research project. |
| Other trial partners | Not specified |
| Crop types | Cereal (Grain): Barley Weed: Brome grass |
|---|---|
| Treatment type(s) |
|
| Trial type | Experimental |
| Trial design | Randomised,Replicated,Blocked |
| Sow rate or Target density | 100 seeds/m2; 150 seeds/m2; 200 seeds/m2 |
|---|---|
| Sow date | TOS 1: 29 April, 2019; TOS 2: 23 May, 2019 |
| Harvest date | Not applicable |
| Trial design method | SPD Split Plot Design |
| Plot size | 2m x 10m |
| Plot replication | 3 |
| Plot randomisation | Y |
| Fertiliser |
At sowing – DAP+Zn+Impact (18:20:0:2) @ 75 kg/ha, Post application of Urea 7 August |
| Herbicide |
29 April and 23 May, 2019 (applied just before seeding) 1. Control (knockdown only) 2. Triflur Xtra (480 g/L trifluralin) @ 1.5L/ha + Avadex (500 g/L triallate) @ 2L/ha + RoundUp PowerMax (540 g/L glyphosate) @ 2L/ha IBS 3. Triflur Xtra (480 g/L trifluralin) @ 1.5L/ha + Avadex (500 g/L triallate) @ 2L/ha + RoundUp PowerMax (540 g/L glyphosate) @ 2L/ha IBS Fb Intervix (33 g/L imazamox + 15 g/L imazapyr) @ 0.6L/ha (TOS1: GS30, TOS2: GS21) |
| Sow rate or Target density | Not specified |
|---|---|
| Sow date | Not applicable |
| Harvest date | Not applicable |
| Trial design method | SPD Split Plot Design |
| Plot size | 2m x 10m |
| Plot replication | 2 |
| Plot randomisation | Y |
| Fertiliser | Not specified |
| Herbicide | Not specified |
SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to
construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol
16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.