The effect of combinations of crop row spacing, seedbed utilisation and pre-emergence herbicides on ryegrass management in barley

2019
CC BY 4.0

Research organisations
Funding source

Trial details

Researcher(s) Ben Fleet
Gurjeet Gill
Contact email gurjeet.gill@adelaide.edu.au
Contact phone 08 83137744
Year(s) 2019
Contributor School of Agriculture, Food and Wine - The University of Adelaide
Trial location(s) Minnipa, SA
The effect of combinations of crop row spacing, seedbed utilisation and pre-emergence herbicides on ryegrass management in barley locations
Aims

Investigate the influence of barley row spacing, seedbed utilisation and herbicides on ryegrass management.

Key messages

The herbicide treatment had a significant effect on annual ryegrass (ARG) plant density (P<0.001) in this field trial at Minnipa. Favourable rain events in May were highly suitable for the activity of both pre-emergent herbicides investigated in this trial. Averaged across the row spacing and seed boot treatments, Trifluralin and Boxer Gold reduced ARG plant density by 20% and 90%, respectively. The density of ARG spikes was significantly influenced by the row spacing (P<0.001), seed boot treatment (P=0.027), and the herbicide treatment (P<0.001). The 25cm row spacing had 20% lower ARG spike density than the 37.5cm row spacing treatment. The splitter seed boot treatment had 12% lower ARG spike density than the narrow seed boot treatment. Trifluralin only reduced ARG spike density by 20% compared to the untreated control, whereas Boxer Gold caused a 73% reduction in ARG spike density. ARG seed production was also significantly affected by the row spacing (P=0.003), seed boot (P=0.01), and the herbicide treatment (P<0.001). The normal (25 cm) row spacing set 38% less seed than the wide row spacing. The splitter seed boot treatment also had 32% lower ARG seed set compared to the narrow seed boot. ARG produced 4792 seeds/m2 in the untreated control, which was reduced by 11% by Trifluralin and 69% by Boxer Gold. Presence of ARG at 262 plants/m2 in the untreated control, reduced barley grain yield by 8% compared to Trifluralin or 16% compared to Boxer Gold. However, it was still profitable to control ARG with effective herbicide treatments. Based on cash grain price of Feed Barley of $250/t in 2019, Trifluralin would be expected to increase the gross margin by $32/ha as compared $71/ha increase for Boxer Gold.

Lead research organisation School of Agriculture, Food and Wine - The University of Adelaide
Host research organisation SARDI Minnipa Agricultural Centre
Trial funding source GRDC 9175134
Related program N/A
Acknowledgments

We thank GRDC for providing funding for this research project and Bruce Heddle for hosting this trial.


Other trial partners Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop types Cereal (Grain): Barley Weed: Ryegrass
Treatment type(s)
  • Herbicide : Type
  • Sowing : Method
  • Sowing : Row Spacing
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Randomised,Replicated,Blocked

Minnipa 2019 Barley

Sow rate or Target density 180 seeds/m2
Sow date 20 May 2019
Harvest date Not applicable
Trial design method SPD Split Plot Design
Plot size 1.5m x 10m
Plot replication 4
Plot randomisation Y
Fertiliser

At sowing – DAP (18:20) @ 60 kg/ha 

Herbicide

20 May, 2019 (applied just before seeding) Boxer Gold® (800 g/L prosulfocarb + 120 g/L s metolachlor) @ 2.5 L/ha IBS Trifluralin® (480 g/L trifluralin) @1.5 L/ha IBS Control (knockdown treatment only) 

Minnipa 2019 Ryegrass

Sow rate or Target density Not specified
Sow date Not applicable
Harvest date Not applicable
Trial design method SPD Split Plot Design
Plot size 1.5m x 10m
Plot replication 4
Plot randomisation Y
Fertiliser Not specified
Herbicide Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information
Trial source data and summary not available
Check the trial report PDF for trial results.
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Not specified
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Minnipa, SA Not specified
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
Minnipa, SA Calcarosol
Soil Moisture Source: BOM/ANU
Average amount of water stored in the soil profile during the year, estimated by the OzWALD model-data fusion system.
Year Minnipa SA
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000

Climate

Derived climate information

No observed climate data available for this trial.
Derived climate data is determined from trial site location and national weather sources.

Minnipa SA

NOTE: Exact trial site locality unknown - Climate data may not be accurate
Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.

Trial report and links

2019 trial report



Trial last modified: 09-10-2025 02:36am AEST