The interaction between seeding rate and row spacing of hybrid and open pollinated canola (Brassica napus) varieties on annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) growth and seed production.

2018

Research organisations
Funding source

Trial details

Researcher(s) Mike Ashworth
Richard Devlin
Suman Rakshit
Roberto Rocha
Rebecca Smith
Contact email mike.ashworth@uwa.edu.au
Year(s) 2018
Contributor School of Agriculture and Environment - The University of Western Australia
Trial location(s) Kojonup, WA
Miling, WA
The interaction between seeding rate and row spacing of hybrid and open pollinated canola (Brassica napus) varieties on annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) growth and seed production. locations
Aims

The trials located at Miling and Kojonup in the grainbelt of Western Australia investigated combinations of canola variety (hybrid or open pollinated), crop row spacing (25 or 50cm) and canola seeding rate (20, 35 or 50 plants/m2). 

Key messages

The trials located at Miling and Kojonup in the grainbelt of Western Australia investigated combinations of canola variety (hybrid or open pollinated), crop row spacing (25 or 50cm) and canola seeding rate (20, 35 or 50 plants/m2). The average seedbank at the Miling and Kojonup sites were 3,630 seeds/m2 and 23,240 seeds/m2 respectively.  Annual ryegrass (ARG) establishment was reduced in hybrid canola treatments seeded at narrower 25 cm row spacing. Decreasing crop row spacing (from 50 to 25cm) and increasing canola seeding rate (from 20 to 50 plants/m2) was found to reduce ARG establishment in the absence of herbicides. At the Kojonup site, ARG seed production was reduced by hybrid varieties (Trophy) and higher plant densities (50 plants/m2). However due to the low rainfall at the Miling site, no interactions were identified. Canola yield in this study was increased in hybrid variety (Trophy) treatments especially at higher seeding rates (50 plants/m2). Interestingly, however, canola seeded at the wider row spacing (50cm) consistently out yielded the corresponding variety and seeding rate combination at the narrower 25cm row spacing. This study conducted two trials in 2018 (Mingenew and Cunderdin) and 2019 (Miling and Kojonup). Multi- environment trial analysis for the combined 2018 and 2019 data to be completed.

Lead research organisation Australian Herbicide Resistance Initiative
Host research organisation N/A
Trial funding source GRDC 9175134
Related program N/A
Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Grains Research Development Corporation of Australia (GRDC).


Other trial partners Living Farm
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop types Oilseed: Canola Weed: Ryegrass
Treatment type(s)
  • Crop : Variety
  • Sowing : Rate
  • Sowing : Row Spacing
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Randomised,Replicated,Blocked

Kojonup 2018 Canola

Sow rate or Target density 20, 35 and 50 plants/m2
Sowing machinery

Knife points and press wheels

Sow date 3 May 2019
Harvest date Unknown
Trial design method RCBD Randomised Complete Block Design
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication 3
Plot randomisation N
Fertiliser

Please refer to the trial report for treatment details

Herbicide

Please refer to the trial report for treatment details

Insecticide

Seed treatment: 1 L/100kg-seed Cruiser Opti  

Pre emergent: 1 L/ha chlorpyrifos  200 mL/ha bifenthrin  

Post emergent: 300 mL/ha Affirm 

Seed treatment 400 mL/100kg-seed Maxim XL ;

Kojonup 2018 Ryegrass

Sow rate or Target density Not specified
Sowing machinery

Knife points and press wheels

Sow date Not applicable
Harvest date Not applicable
Trial design method RCBD Randomised Complete Block Design
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication 3
Plot randomisation N
Fertiliser Not specified
Herbicide Not specified
Insecticide Not specified
Seed treatment Not specified

Miling 2018 Canola

Sow rate or Target density 20, 35 and 50 plants/m2
Sowing machinery

Knife points and press wheels

Sow date 3 May 2019
Harvest date Unknown
Trial design method RCBD Randomised Complete Block Design
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication 3
Plot randomisation N
Fertiliser

Please refer to the trial report for treatment details

Herbicide

Please refer to the trial report for treatment details

Insecticide

Seed treatment: 1 L/100kg-seed Cruiser Opti  

Pre emergent: 1 L/ha chlorpyrifos  200 mL/ha bifenthrin  

Post emergent: 300 mL/ha Affirm 

Seed treatment 400 mL/100kg-seed Maxim XL ;

Miling 2018 Ryegrass

Sow rate or Target density Not specified
Sowing machinery

Knife points and press wheels

Sow date Not applicable
Harvest date Not applicable
Trial design method RCBD Randomised Complete Block Design
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication 3
Plot randomisation N
Fertiliser Not specified
Herbicide Not specified
Insecticide Not specified
Seed treatment Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information
Trial source data and summary not available
Check the trial report PDF for trial results.
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Not specified
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Kojonup, WA Not specified
Miling, WA Not specified
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
Kojonup, WA Sodosol
Miling, WA Kandosol
Soil Moisture Source: BOM/ANU
Average amount of water stored in the soil profile during the year, estimated by the OzWALD model-data fusion system.
Year Kojonup WA Miling WA
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000

Climate

Derived climate information

No observed climate data available for this trial.
Derived climate data is determined from trial site location and national weather sources.

Kojonup WA

Miling WA

Kojonup WA

NOTE: Exact trial site locality unknown - Climate data may not be accurate
Loading
Loading
Loading

Miling WA

NOTE: Exact trial site locality unknown - Climate data may not be accurate
Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.

Trial report and links

2018 trial report



Trial last modified: 10-10-2025 00:50am AEST