The interaction between seeding rate and row spacing of hybrid and open pollinated canola (Brassica napus) varieties on wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum) growth and seed production.

2019

Research organisations
Funding source

Trial details

Researcher(s) Mike Ashworth
Zhanglong Cao
Richard Devlin
Roberto Rocha
Rebecca Smith
Contact email mike.ashworth@uwa.edu.au
Year(s) 2019
Contributor School of Agriculture and Environment - The University of Western Australia
Trial location(s) Cunderdin, ACT
The interaction between seeding rate and row spacing of hybrid and open pollinated canola (Brassica napus) varieties on wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum) growth and seed production. locations
Aims

This trial was located at Cunderdin in the grainbelt of Western Australia and investigated combinations of canola variety (Hybrid or open pollinated), crop row spacing (25 or 50cm) and canola seeding rate (20, 35 or 50 plants/m2) on wild radish (WR) competitiveness and seed production.

Key messages

This trial found that WR establishment from this seed was reduced in hybrid canola treatments seeded at narrower 25 cm row spacing. Decreasing crop row spacing from 50 to 25cm and increasing canola seeding rate from 20 to 50 plants/m2 reduced WR establishment in the absence of herbicides. At the Cunderdin site, WR seed production was reduced within hybrid variety treatments (Trophy) and when seeded at higher plant densities (50 plants/m2). However due to the low rainfall at the Miling site, no interactions were identified. (P>0.05). Canola yield in this study was increased in the open pollinated variety treatments (Bonito) especially when seeded at higher seeding rates (50 plants/m2). Interestingly however, canola seeded at the wider row spacing (50cm) consistently out yielded the corresponding variety and seeding rate combination at the narrower 25cm row spacing. This study conducted two trials at Cunderdin in 2018 and 2019. Multi-environment trial analysis for the combined data to be completed.
 

Lead research organisation Australian Herbicide Resistance Initiative
Host research organisation N/A
Trial funding source GRDC 9175134
Related program N/A
Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Grains Research Development Corporation of Australia


Other trial partners Living Farm
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop types Oilseed: Canola Weed: Wild Raddish
Treatment type(s)
  • Crop : Variety
  • Sowing : Rate
  • Sowing : Row Spacing
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Randomised,Replicated,Blocked

Cunderdin 2019 Canola

Sow rate or Target density 20, 35 and 50 plants/m²
Sowing machinery

Knife points and press wheels

Sow date 11 May 2019
Harvest date Unknown
Trial design method RCBD Randomised Complete Block Design
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication 3
Plot randomisation Y
Fertiliser

Please refer to the trial report for details

Herbicide

Pre emergent: 2 L/ha Roundup Ultra Max; 1 L/ha propyzamide  150 g/ha Lontrel (PSPE);  Other pre-em herbicides as per treatment list  

Post emergent: As per treatment list;  100 mL/ha Verdict (volunteer cereal management);  2 L/ha Reglone (23 Oct 2019)  

 

Insecticide

Seed treatment: 1 L/100 kg-seed Cruiser Opti

Pre emergent: 1 L/ha chlorpyrifos;  200 mL/ha bifenthrin    

Post-emergent  1 L/ha chlorpyrifos; 50 g/ha Transform; 300 mL/ha Affirm  

Seed treatment 400 mL/100 kg-seed Maxim XL

Cunderdin 2019 Wild Raddish

Sow rate or Target density Not specified
Sowing machinery Not specified
Sow date Not applicable
Harvest date Not applicable
Trial design method RCBD Randomised Complete Block Design
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication 3
Plot randomisation Y
Fertiliser Not specified
Herbicide Not specified
Insecticide Not specified
Seed treatment Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information
Trial source data and summary not available
Check the trial report PDF for trial results.
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Not specified
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Cunderdin, ACT Not specified
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
Cunderdin, ACT Sodosol
Soil Moisture Source: BOM/ANU
Average amount of water stored in the soil profile during the year, estimated by the OzWALD model-data fusion system.
Year Cunderdin ACT
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000

Climate

Derived climate information

No observed climate data available for this trial.
Derived climate data is determined from trial site location and national weather sources.

Cunderdin ACT

Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.

Trial report and links

2019 trial report



Trial last modified: 10-10-2025 00:26am AEST