Faba Beans, Herbicide Tolerance (Group B), MRZ Wimmera (Horsham), Victoria

2019
CC BY 4.0

Research organisaton
Funding source

Trial details

Researcher(s) Jason Brand
Mitch Fromm
Tim Nigussie
Year(s) 2019
Contributor Southern Pulse Agronomy
Trial location(s) Horsham, VIC
Faba Beans, Herbicide Tolerance (Group B), MRZ Wimmera (Horsham), Victoria locations
Aims

To invesigate the tolerance of a newly released faba bean variety PBA Bendoc to post sowing pre-emergence (PSPE) and in-crop application timings of Group B herbicides in comparison with PBA Samira.

Key messages

Group B herbicide application timing significantly influenced plant height, biomass and grain yield of faba bean varieties. The level of herbicide damage and subsequent yield losses from the herbicide treatments were generally more severe in PBA Samira than PBA Bendoc, and when applied incrop than PSPE. PBA Samira incurred significant yield loss from all the herbicide treatments except SU1 applied at PSPE and Imi2 applied at PSPE and flowering. In contrast, PBA Bendoc showed improved tolerance and did not have significant yield loss from most herbicide treatments except in-crop application of SU2 and SU1.

Horsham VIC 2019

Varieties: PBA Bendoc and PBA Samira

Lead research organisation Southern Pulse Agronomy
Host research organisation N/A
Trial funding source GRDC DAV00150
Related program N/A
Acknowledgments N/A
Other trial partners Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop type Grain Legume: Faba beans
Treatment type(s)
  • Herbicide: Timing
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Replicated

Horsham 2019

Sow rate or Target density 20 plants/m2
Sow date 14 May 2019
Harvest date Unknown
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified
Fertiliser

80 kg/ha MAP

Herbicide

Group B: 2x Sulfonlureas, 2x Imidazoliones, 1x Sulfonamide

Timing: PSPE, 4 node, 8 node, Flowering

 

Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information
Trial source data and summary not available
Check the trial report PDF for trial results.
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Site Depth Type pH EC P K N A OC CAT
Horsham, VIC Cracking Clay 7.70 0.33 35.00 688.00 13.00 14.00 1.55
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Horsham, VIC Clay
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
Horsham, VIC Vertosol
Soil Moisture Source: BOM/ANU
Average amount of water stored in the soil profile during the year, estimated by the OzWALD model-data fusion system.
Year Horsham VIC
2019 845.8mm
2018 842.4mm
2017 856.5mm
2016 852.2mm
2015 844.6mm
2014 838.6mm
2013 843.8mm
2012 851.0mm
2011 856.7mm
2010 858.7mm
2009 850.1mm
2008 850.5mm
2007 851.7mm
2006 840.3mm
2005 852.1mm
2004 833.5mm
2003 795.2mm
2002 733.4mm
2001 712.5mm
2000 665.7mm
National soil grid Source: CSIRO/TERN
NOTE: National Soil Grid data is aggregated information for background information on the wider area
Actual soil values can vary significantly in a small area and the trial soil tests are the most relevant data where available

Soil properties

Loading

Climate

Derived climate information

No observed climate data available for this trial.
Derived climate data is determined from trial site location and national weather sources.

Horsham VIC

Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.



Trial last modified: 14-03-2023 11:00am AEST