Barley grass control in a wheat-barley-vetch rotation

2019 - 2021

Research organisatons
Funding sources

Trial details

Aims

Barley grass is one of the major weeds in the southern region. Many southern growers think their barley grass is resistant to grass selective herbicides and may have developed late germination to avoid pre-seeding herbicides. In this area, barley grass is a major problem in pastures, and often in break crops as well.

The trial aims to investigate pre-emergent herbicides in wheat in 2019, crop density and post-emergent herbicides in barley in 2020, and pre-emergent herbicides and grass selective herbicides in vetch in 2021.

Key messages
  • Barley grass can have late, staggered cohorts, and so full control requires pre- and post-emergent control.
  • Clearfield® crops or pasture ‘break crops’ allow excellent in-crop control and reduction of barley grass seed production.
  • Resistance remains very low at this site. A diverse crop rotation allows a rotation of herbicide groups to avoid resistance development.
Esperance WA 2019 Wheat

Crop yield was low in all treatments, due to very low rainfall during the 2019 season. Barley grass seed production was lowest following Sakura® + Treflan® and Sakura® alone.

Esperance WA 2020 Barley

Different seeding rates made no difference to crop density, as the establishment was low and variable due to dry conditions. Intercept® applied in-crop provided excellent weed control across the trial.

Esperance WA 2021 Vetch

The best barley grass control in vetch was from Quiz® and clethodim post emergent.

Lead research organisation University of Adelaide
Host research organisation South East Premium Wheat Growers Association
Trial funding source GRDC UOA1903-004SAX
Trial funding source DPIRD WA UOA1903-004SAX
Related program Demonstrating and validating the implementation of integrated weed management strategies to control barley grass in the low rainfall zone farming system
Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Harris family for providing a site and running the trial, and Michelle Handley, Niki Curtis and Andrea Carmody (SEPWA), Greg Warren and Richard Scott (Farm & General) and Nerys Wilkins (DPIRD) for their assistance with the trial management and measurements. The trial was sponsored by BASF (who provided Luximax® herbicide).


Other trial partners Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop types Cereal (Grain): Wheat Cereal (Grain): Barley Hay: Vetch
Treatment type(s)
  • Herbicide: Type
Trial type Demonstration
Trial design Randomised,Replicated

Esperance 2019 Wheat

Sow rate or Target density 65 kg/ha
Sowing machinery

Wheat cv. Mace

56 foot John Deere Conserva Pack, borgault bin and liquid cart  

30cm row spacing

Sow date 14 June 2019
Harvest date 18 November 2019
Plot size 36m x 1400m
Plot replication 4
Plot blocking Yes
Plot randomisation Randomised block design
Fertiliser

14 Jun 2019. DAPSZC at 80kg/ha, UAN at 50L/ha, zinc sulphate at 1L/ha, manganese sulphate at 1L/ha

Herbicide

30 May 2019. Glyphosate 540 at 2L/ha

3 Jun 2019. Gramoxone® 360 2L/ha + Sharpen® 17g/ha

14 Jun 2019. Pre-emergent herbicides prior to seeding, according to treatments

  1. Treflan® at 2L/ha
  2. Sakura® at 118g/ha
  3. Treflan® at 2L/ha + Sakura® at 118g/ha
  4. Luximax® at 500mL/ha
Fungicide

14 Jun 2019. Flutriafol® 250 at 300mL/ha

Other trial notes

The greater crop yield, and visual assessment of the good barley grass control with a higher level of Intercept® highlight the value of this herbicide in 2020. The grower, who was using the trial to test the suitability of ClearfieldTM barley to the enterprise, gained the confidence to plant 50% of the barley program to ClearfieldTM barley cv. Spartacus in 2021.

However, this trial also highlights the problem with late cohorts of barley grass and the limited options for controlling late cohorts. The GRDC project UA00156 (‘Seed bank ecology’) highlighted that it is common for barley grass to have delayed emergence compared to some other winter grass species (like great brome or annual ryegrass). The project further highlighted that, depending on seasonal conditions, barley grass emergence can continue in July and August. These late cohorts are not controlled by post-emergent herbicides, and harvest weed seed control may have limited practicality for barley grass, depending on shedding times.

This trial has shown that, in cereal crops, both pre-emergent and post-emergent herbicides can provide excellent weed control, but late-emerging cohorts can replenish the seed bank. The pasture rotation in 2021 offered a valuable opportunity to apply control measures later in the season, with two applications of grass selective herbicide. This late-season control to reduce seed production of staggered cohorts gave excellent seed set control. This confirms that break crops, with more herbicide options, are excellent for grass weed control.

The soil constraints in this field are exacerbating the weed issues. A soil amelioration program will increase yield and improve weed control going forward, but amelioration programs can be expensive. Careful consideration should be given to the best type of amelioration, overall cost, and potential benefit.

Esperance 2020 Barley

Sow rate or Target density 40 or 65kg/ha
Sowing machinery

Barley cv. Spartacus

56 foot John Deere Conserva Pack, borgault bin and liquid cart  

30cm row spacing

Sow date 30 April 2020
Harvest date 18 November 2020
Plot size 36m x 1400m
Plot replication 4
Plot blocking Yes
Plot randomisation Randomised block design
Fertiliser

29 June 2020. Zn, Mn

Flexi N 50L/ha

Herbicide

30 April 2020. Treflan® 2L/ha

29 June 2020. Intercept® 375 or 500mL/ha

  1. Barley 40kg/ha, Intercept® at 375mL/ha
  2. Barley 40kg/ha, Intercept® at 500mL/ha
  3. Barley 65kg/ha, Intercept® at 375mL/ha
  4. Barley 65kg/ha, Intercept® at 500mL/ha
Fungicide Not specified
Other trial notes

The greater crop yield, and visual assessment of the good barley grass control with a higher level of Intercept® highlight the value of this herbicide in 2020. The grower, who was using the trial to test the suitability of ClearfieldTM barley to the enterprise, gained the confidence to plant 50% of the barley program to ClearfieldTM barley cv. Spartacus in 2021.

However, this trial also highlights the problem with late cohorts of barley grass and the limited options for controlling late cohorts. The GRDC project UA00156 (‘Seed bank ecology’) highlighted that it is common for barley grass to have delayed emergence compared to some other winter grass species (like great brome or annual ryegrass). The project further highlighted that, depending on seasonal conditions, barley grass emergence can continue in July and August. These late cohorts are not controlled by post-emergent herbicides, and harvest weed seed control may have limited practicality for barley grass, depending on shedding times.

This trial has shown that, in cereal crops, both pre-emergent and post-emergent herbicides can provide excellent weed control, but late-emerging cohorts can replenish the seed bank. The pasture rotation in 2021 offered a valuable opportunity to apply control measures later in the season, with two applications of grass selective herbicide. This late-season control to reduce seed production of staggered cohorts gave excellent seed set control. This confirms that break crops, with more herbicide options, are excellent for grass weed control.

The soil constraints in this field are exacerbating the weed issues. A soil amelioration program will increase yield and improve weed control going forward, but amelioration programs can be expensive. Careful consideration should be given to the best type of amelioration, overall cost, and potential benefit.

Esperance 2021 Vetch

Sow rate or Target density 45 kg/ha
Sowing machinery

Vetch cv. Volga

56 foot John Deere Conserva Pack, borgault bin and liquid cart  

30cm row spacing

Sow date 22 April 2021
Harvest date 15 December 2021 The site was grazed, not harvested.
Plot size 36m x 1400m
Plot replication 4
Plot blocking Yes
Plot randomisation Randomised block design
Fertiliser Not specified
Herbicide

22 April 2021. Paraquat 360 1L/ha

22 April 2021. Pre-emergent treatments.

12 June 2021. Post-emergent treatments.

  1. Treflan® 1.2L/ha pre-emergent, Quiz® 200g/L 125mL/ha post-emergent.
  2. Treflan® 1.2L/ha + diuron 500g/ha pre-emergent, Quiz® 200g/L 125mL/ha post-emergent.
  3. Treflan® 1.2L/ha + diuron 500g/ha pre-emergent, Quiz® 200g/L 125mL/ha + Clethodim® 500 mL/ha post-emergent.
  4. Ultro® 1.1kg/ha pre-emergent, Quiz® 200g/L 125mL/ha + Clethodim® 500 mL/ha post-emergent.
Fungicide Not specified
Other trial notes

The greater crop yield, and visual assessment of the good barley grass control with a higher level of Intercept® highlight the value of this herbicide in 2020. The grower, who was using the trial to test the suitability of ClearfieldTM barley to the enterprise, gained the confidence to plant 50% of the barley program to ClearfieldTM barley cv. Spartacus in 2021.

However, this trial also highlights the problem with late cohorts of barley grass and the limited options for controlling late cohorts. The GRDC project UA00156 (‘Seed bank ecology’) highlighted that it is common for barley grass to have delayed emergence compared to some other winter grass species (like great brome or annual ryegrass). The project further highlighted that, depending on seasonal conditions, barley grass emergence can continue in July and August. These late cohorts are not controlled by post-emergent herbicides, and harvest weed seed control may have limited practicality for barley grass, depending on shedding times.

This trial has shown that, in cereal crops, both pre-emergent and post-emergent herbicides can provide excellent weed control, but late-emerging cohorts can replenish the seed bank. The pasture rotation in 2021 offered a valuable opportunity to apply control measures later in the season, with two applications of grass selective herbicide. This late-season control to reduce seed production of staggered cohorts gave excellent seed set control. This confirms that break crops, with more herbicide options, are excellent for grass weed control.

The soil constraints in this field are exacerbating the weed issues. A soil amelioration program will increase yield and improve weed control going forward, but amelioration programs can be expensive. Careful consideration should be given to the best type of amelioration, overall cost, and potential benefit.

Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information

Download results

Trial results Table 1. Crop and barley grass density, barley grass panicle and seed production and wheat yield for each treatment. P and LSD values are included for separation of means. Note that barley grass panicle and seed production means are back-transformed from

# Variety
Treatment 1

Grain yield t/ha


Loading

Barley grass density plants/m2


Loading

Barley grass panicles heads/m2


Loading

Barley grass seeds seeds/m2


Loading

Crop Establishment plants/m2


Loading

Trial results Table 2. Crop and barley grass density, barley grass panicles, barley grass seed production and crop yield. P and LSD values are included for separation of means. Note that barley grass panicle and seed production data is back-transformed from a log trans

# Variety
Treatment 1

Barley grass density heads/m2


Loading

Barley grass panicles heads/m2


Loading

Barley grass seeds seeds/m2


Loading

Crop Establishment plants/m2


Loading

Trial results Table 3. Pasture and barley grass density, barley grass panicles, barley grass seed production and pasture biomass. P and LSD values are included for separation of means. Note that barley grass density, panicle and seed production data is back-transformed

# Variety
Treatment 1

Barley grass density plants/m2


Loading

Barley grass panicles heads/m2


Loading

Barley grass seeds seeds/m2


Loading

Crop Establishment plants/m2


Loading

Pasture biomass t/ha


Loading
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Not specified
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Esperance, WA Not specified
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
Esperance, WA Calcarosol
National soil grid Source: CSIRO/TERN
NOTE: National Soil Grid data is aggregated information for background information on the wider area
Actual soil values can vary significantly in a small area and the trial soil tests are the most relevant data where available

Soil properties

Loading

Climate

Esperance WA 2019


Observed climate information

Rainfall trial total (mm) 197mm
Rainfall trial gsr (mm) 155mm

Esperance WA 2020


Observed climate information

Rainfall trial total (mm) 318mm
Rainfall trial gsr (mm) 183mm

Esperance WA 2021


Observed climate information

Rainfall trial total (mm) 385mm
Rainfall trial gsr (mm) 269mm

Derived climate information

Esperance WA

Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.

Trial report and links

2019 trial report



Trial last modified: 10-02-2022 13:28pm AEST