Effect of seed rate and herbicides on annual ryegrass management in wheat

2022
CC BY 4.0

Research organisations
Funding source

Trial details

Researcher(s) Ben Fleet
Gurjeet Gill
Contact email gurjeet.gill@adelaide.edu.au
Contact phone 0428 592825
Year(s) 2022
Contributor School of Agriculture, Food and Wine - The University of Adelaide
Trial location(s) Gladstone, ACT
Effect of seed rate and herbicides on annual ryegrass management in wheat locations
Aims

This field trial at Gladstone was undertaken to investigate factorial combinations of wheat seed rate and herbicides on the management of annual ryegrass.

Key messages

Key messages
• Even though the increase in wheat plant density from 100 to 250 plants/m2 reduced ARG spike density by 19%, this was not statistically significant (P=0.225). However, ARG spike density was significantly affected by different herbicide treatments (P<0.001).
• Surprisingly Sakura® (pyroxasulfone) was relatively ineffective with more than 700 spikes/m2. In contrast, Overwatch® (bixlozone) treatment had significantly less ARG spike density. The most effective herbicide treatment was the combination of Overwatch® immediately before crop sowing (IBS) with early post-emergent (EP) Mateno Complete® (aclonifen, pyroxasulfone, and diflufenican).
• Overwatch® by itself produced wheat yield of 6.2 t/ha, which was almost 1 t/ha higher than Sakura®. The highest crop yield (7.03 t/ha) was achieved in the treatment where Overwatch® was followed by early post-emergent application of Mateno Complete®.

Gladstone ACT 2022

Variety: Scepter Wheat

Trial design: Factorial randomised block design 

Lead research organisation School of Agriculture, Food and Wine - The University of Adelaide
Host research organisation The University of Adelaide
Trial funding source GRDC 9175134
Related program GRDC - Weeds
Acknowledgments

We thank GRDC for providing funding for this research.


Other trial partners Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop type Cereal (Grain): Wheat
Treatment type(s)
  • Herbicide : Type
  • Management systems : Integrated weed management
  • Sowing : Rate
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Randomised,Replicated,Blocked

Gladstone 2022

Sow rate or Target density 100, 150, 200 and 250 seeds/m2
Sow date 16 June 2022
Harvest date Unknown
Trial design method O Other
Plot size 1.83m x 10m
Plot replication 3
Plot randomisation Y
Fertiliser

At sowing – DAP + zinc + impact (18:20:0:2) @ 100 kg/ha. Urea (46:0:0) @ 100kg/ha late tillering (August 1) Urea (46:0:0) @ 100kg/ha at GS32 (September 13) 

Herbicide

Refer to the trial report for treatment details

Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information
Trial source data and summary not available
Check the trial report PDF for trial results.
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Not specified
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Gladstone, ACT Not specified
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
Gladstone, ACT Sodosol

Climate

Derived climate information

No observed climate data available for this trial.
Derived climate data is determined from trial site location and national weather sources.

Gladstone ACT

NOTE: Exact trial site locality unknown - Climate data may not be accurate
Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.

Trial report and links

2022 trial report



Trial last modified: 17-01-2026 00:09am AEST