GRDC Waterlogging

2021
CC BY 4.0

Research organisation
Funding source

Trial details

Researcher(s) Ashley Amourgis
Greta Duff
Contact email gduff@sfs.org.au
Contact phone 0428871900
Year(s) 2021
Contributor Southern Farming Systems
Trial location(s) Hagley, TAS
Hamilton, VIC
Streatham, VIC
Vite Vite North, VIC
Further information View external link
GRDC Waterlogging locations
Aims

To investigate how nutrition can help mitigate waterlogging losses in wheat, canol and faba beans after a wet winter

Key messages

Despite presenting with some waterlogging symptoms, faba beans and canola yielded exceptionally well. It is critical to understand the crop growth stage during waterlogging to determine potential yield impacts.

• Nutritional products applied did not influence grain yield except for the trial at Hagley, Tasmania, where a yield response was observed with different rates of nitrogen applied.

• Established plants will be most affected when they are rapidly growing, for example prolonged waterlogging during the warmer spring period is where yield penalties will be most severe.

Lead research organisation Southern Farming Systems
Host research organisation Southern Farming Systems
Trial funding source GRDC SFS2109-001SAX
Related program N/A
Acknowledgments

GRDC for the funding and SFS for the management of the trial


Other trial partners Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop types Cereal (Grain): Wheat Oilseed: Canola Grain Legume: Faba beans
Treatment type(s)
  • Crop : Nutrition
  • Fertiliser : Rate
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Replicated

Hagley 2021 Wheat

Sow rate or Target density 170
Sow date 12 May 2021
Harvest date 18 January 2022
Plot size 1.8m x 9.5m
Plot replication 4
Plot blocking Blocked
Fertiliser

 

Treatment 1 : Urea Full rate (180 kg N/ha) 

Treatment 2 : Urea + SOA  Full rate (180 kg N/ha) 

Treatment 3 : Urea + SOA + Trace elements Full rate (180 kg N/ha) 

Treatment 4 : Urea Reduced rate (100 kg N/ha) 

Treatment 5 : Urea + SOA  Reduced rate (100 kg N/ha) 

Treatment 6 : Urea + SOA + Trace elements Reduced rate (100 kg N/ha) 

Treatment 7 : Nil control 

Hamilton 2021 Wheat

Sow rate or Target density 160
Sow date 7 May 2021
Harvest date 22 January 2022
Plot size 1.8m x 8.9m
Plot replication 4
Plot blocking Blocked
Fertiliser

Trace elements were applied at 3L/ha

Treatment 1 : Urea Full rate (145 kg N/ha) 

Treatment 2 : Urea + Trace elements  Full rate (145 kg N/ha) 

Treatment 3 : Urea + SOA  Full rate (145 kg N/ha) 

Treatment 4 : Urea + SOA + Trace elements Full rate (145 kg N/ha) 

Treatment 5 : UAN (soil) Full rate (145 kg N/ha) 

Treatment 6 : Full rate (145 kg N/ha) 

UAN (soil) + Trace elements 

Treatment 7 : UAN (foliar) + Urea Full rate (145 kg

Streatham 2021 Canola

Sow rate or Target density 40
Sow date 10 April 2021
Harvest date 17 December 2022
Plot size 1.8m x 18m
Plot replication 4
Plot blocking Blocked
Fertiliser

Treatment 1 :  Urea  220 kg/ha 

Treatment 2 :  Urea 175 kg/ha,  SOA 100 kg/ha 

Treatment 3 :  Urea  175 kg,  SOA 100 kg/ha, Trace elements 3 L 

Treatment 4 :  Nil control 

Vite Vite North 2021 Faba beans

Sow rate or Target density 20
Sow date 30 April 2021
Harvest date 12 December 2022
Plot size 1.8m x 9.6m
Plot replication 4
Plot blocking Blocked
Fertiliser

Treatment 1 : Urea 0 kg/ha 

Treatment 2 : Urea 60 kg/ha 

Treatment 3 : Urea 120 kg/ha 

Treatment 4 : Urea 180 kg/ha 

Treatment 5 : Urea 240 kg/ha 

Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information
Trial source data and summary not available
Check the trial report PDF for trial results.
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Not specified
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Hagley, TAS Not specified
Hamilton, VIC Not specified
Streatham, VIC Not specified
Vite Vite North, VIC Not specified
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
Hagley, TAS Sodosol
Hamilton, VIC Kurosol
Streatham, VIC Sodosol
Vite Vite North, VIC Sodosol

Climate

Derived climate information

No observed climate data available for this trial.
Derived climate data is determined from trial site location and national weather sources.

Hagley VIC

Hamilton VIC

Streatham VIC

Vite Vite North VIC

Hagley VIC

NOTE: Exact trial site locality unknown - Climate data may not be accurate
Loading
Loading
Loading

Hamilton VIC

NOTE: Exact trial site locality unknown - Climate data may not be accurate
Loading
Loading
Loading

Streatham VIC

NOTE: Exact trial site locality unknown - Climate data may not be accurate
Loading
Loading
Loading

Vite Vite North VIC

Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.

Trial report and links

Nutrition Strategies for Waterlogging



Trial last modified: 09-01-2026 21:56pm AEST