Researcher(s) | N/A |
---|---|
Contact email | gduff@sfs.org.au |
Contact phone | 0428871900 |
Year(s) | 2021 - 2022 |
Contributor | Southern Farming Systems |
Trial location(s) |
Hagley, TAS
Hamilton, VIC Streatham, VIC Vite Vite North, VIC |
Further information | View external link |
To investigate how nutrition can help mitigate waterlogging losses in wheat, canol and faba beans after a wet winter
Despite presenting with some waterlogging symptoms, faba beans and canola yielded exceptionally well. It is critical to understand the crop growth stage during waterlogging to determine potential yield impacts.
• Nutritional products applied did not influence grain yield except for the trial at Hagley, Tasmania, where a yield response was observed with different rates of nitrogen applied.
• Established plants will be most affected when they are rapidly growing, for example prolonged waterlogging during the warmer spring period is where yield penalties will be most severe.
Lead research organisation |
Southern Farming Systems |
---|---|
Host research organisation |
Southern Farming Systems |
Trial funding source | GRDC SFS2109-001SAX |
Related program | N/A |
Acknowledgments |
GRDC for the funding and SFS for the management of the trial |
Other trial partners | Not specified |
Crop types | Cereal (Grain): Wheat Oilseed: Canola Grain Legume: Faba beans |
---|---|
Treatment type(s) |
|
Trial type | Experimental |
Trial design | Replicated |
Sow rate or Target density | 170 |
---|---|
Sow date | 7 July 2023 |
Harvest date | 18 January 2022 |
Plot size | 1.8m x 9.5m |
Plot replication | 4 |
Plot blocking | Blocked |
Plot randomisation | Randomised |
Fertiliser |
Treatment 1 Urea Full rate (180 kg N/ha) Treatment 2 Urea + SOA Full rate (180 kg N/ha) Treatment 3 Urea + SOA + Trace elements Full rate (180 kg N/ha) Treatment 4 Urea Reduced rate (100 kg N/ha) Treatment 5 Urea + SOA Reduced rate (100 kg N/ha) Treatment 6 Urea + SOA + Trace elements Reduced rate (100 kg N/ha) Treatment 7 Nil control |
Sow rate or Target density | Not specified |
---|---|
Sow date | Not specified |
Harvest date | Not specified |
Plot size | Not specified |
Plot replication | Not specified |
Plot blocking | Not specified |
Plot randomisation | Not specified |
Fertiliser | Not specified |
Sow rate or Target density | Not specified |
---|---|
Sow date | Not specified |
Harvest date | Not specified |
Plot size | Not specified |
Plot replication | Not specified |
Plot blocking | Not specified |
Plot randomisation | Not specified |
Fertiliser | Not specified |
Sow rate or Target density | 160 |
---|---|
Sow date | 7 May 2022 |
Harvest date | 22 January 2022 |
Plot size | 1.8m x 8.9m |
Plot replication | 4 |
Plot blocking | Blocked |
Plot randomisation | Randomised |
Fertiliser |
Trace elements were applied at 3L/ha Treatment 1 Urea Full rate (145 kg N/ha) Treatment 2 Urea + Trace elements Full rate (145 kg N/ha) Treatment 3 Urea + SOA Full rate (145 kg N/ha) Treatment 4 Urea + SOA + Trace elements Full rate (145 kg N/ha) Treatment 5 UAN (soil) Full rate (145 kg N/ha) Treatment 6 Full rate (145 kg N/ha) UAN (soil) + Trace elements Treatment 7 UAN (foliar) + Urea Full rate (145 kg |
Sow rate or Target density | Not specified |
---|---|
Sow date | Not specified |
Harvest date | Not specified |
Plot size | Not specified |
Plot replication | Not specified |
Plot blocking | Not specified |
Plot randomisation | Not specified |
Fertiliser | Not specified |
Sow rate or Target density | 40 |
---|---|
Sow date | 10 April 2023 |
Harvest date | 17 December 2022 |
Plot size | 1.8m x 18m |
Plot replication | 4 |
Plot blocking | Blocked |
Plot randomisation | Randomised |
Fertiliser |
Treatment 1 Urea 220 kg/ha Treatment 2 Urea 175 kg/ha SOA 100 kg/ha Treatment 3 Urea 175 kg SOA 100 kg/ha Trace elements 3 L Treatment 4 Nil control |
Sow rate or Target density | Not specified |
---|---|
Sow date | Not specified |
Harvest date | Not specified |
Plot size | Not specified |
Plot replication | Not specified |
Plot blocking | Not specified |
Plot randomisation | Not specified |
Fertiliser | Not specified |
Sow rate or Target density | Not specified |
---|---|
Sow date | Not specified |
Harvest date | Not specified |
Plot size | Not specified |
Plot replication | Not specified |
Plot blocking | Not specified |
Plot randomisation | Not specified |
Fertiliser | Not specified |
Sow rate or Target density | 20 |
---|---|
Sow date | 30 April 2021 |
Harvest date | 12 December 2022 |
Plot size | 1.8m x 9.6m |
Plot replication | 4 |
Plot blocking | Blocked |
Plot randomisation | Randomised |
Fertiliser |
Treatment 1 Urea 0 kg/ha Treatment 2 Urea 60 kg/ha Treatment 3 Urea 120 kg/ha Treatment 4 Urea 180 kg/ha Treatment 5 Urea 240 kg/ha |
Sow rate or Target density | Not specified |
---|---|
Sow date | Not specified |
Harvest date | Not specified |
Plot size | Not specified |
Plot replication | Not specified |
Plot blocking | Not specified |
Plot randomisation | Not specified |
Fertiliser | Not specified |
SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.