Residual Control of Common Sowthistle in Fallow

2022
CC BY 4.0

Research organisaton
Funding source

Trial details

Researcher(s) Linda Bailey
Year(s) 2022
Contributor Northern Grower Alliance
Trial location(s) Tummaville, Qld
Residual Control of Common Sowthistle in Fallow locations
Aims

To evaluate residual control of common sowthistle in fallow

Key messages

This trial was established to evaluate residual control of common sowthistle in fallow. Treatments were applied in late December 2021 to a paddock cropped to cotton in 2020/21 and then conventionally farmed. No stubble cover was present and dead or dying weeds provided ~20-40% ground cover. The trial received ~23 mm of rainfall during the first 4 days after application.
The site was inspected at 40, 58, 75 and 126 days after application (40, 58, 75 and 126 DAA) with no seedling weeds present at the initial or final inspection. Seedling weed counts were conducted at 58 and 75 DAA with glufosinate at 5 L/ha applied at 62 DAA to control weeds present at the 58 DAA count. In the fortnight following the clean-up spray, ~180 mm of rainfall was received. A new seedling weed flush was counted at 75 DAA. Seedling common sowthistle and caustic weed (caustic creeper) were present at each assessment.
Despite ~120 mm of rainfall since residual application, common sowthistle was only at trace levels at the 58 DAA assessment with no significant treatment differences. Untreated common sowthistle populations of ~4 /m2 were present at the 75 DAA assessment. Both rates of Valor alone and the experimental Group 14 R provided complete control with mixtures of Valor with Dual Gold or Impose, Voraxor at both rates and Tordon 75-D reducing common sowthistle counts by >90%. Dual Gold, Balance and Terbyne Xtreme did not provide acceptable levels of common sowthistle control under these conditions.
At the 58 DAA assessment, caustic weed was present in the untreated at ~0.6/m2. All treatments other than Balance and Gp 27 C reduced caustic weed numbers by >90%. By the assessment at 75 DAA, caustic weed density was ~2/m2 with complete control from both rates of Valor alone, Valor + Dual Gold, Group 14 R and both rates of Voraxor. The mixture of Valor with Impose also provided >90% control.
In this situation with ~300 mm of rainfall, all treatments containing Valor (alone or in mixture), Voraxor, Tordon 75-D and an experimental Group 14 herbicide provided excellent levels of residual common sowthistle control (95-100%), up to ~70 days after application. Valor, Voraxor and the experimental Group 14 herbicide also provided excellent levels of residual control of caustic weed. Balance, Dual Gold and Terbyne Xtreme only provided moderate levels of weed suppression under the high rainfall conditions.

Lead research organisation Northern Grower Alliance
Host research organisation N/A
Trial funding source GRDC NGA2009-002RTX
Related program N/A
Acknowledgments N/A
Other trial partners Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop type None: No crop specified
Treatment type(s)
  • Herbicide: Type
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Replicated

Tummaville 2022

Sow date Not specified
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information
Trial source data and summary not available
Check the trial report PDF for trial results.
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Not specified
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Tummaville, Qld Not specified
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
Tummaville, Qld Vertosol
National soil grid Source: CSIRO/TERN
NOTE: National Soil Grid data is aggregated information for background information on the wider area
Actual soil values can vary significantly in a small area and the trial soil tests are the most relevant data where available

Soil properties

Loading

Climate

Derived climate information

No observed climate data available for this trial.
Derived climate data is determined from trial site location and national weather sources.

Tummaville Qld

Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.

Trial report and links

2022 trial report



Trial last modified: 13-02-2024 15:57pm AEST