Quantifying the yield risk of planting CMV infected lentil seed in the southern region

2022 - 2023
CC BY 4.0

Research organisation
Funding sources

Trial details

Researcher(s) Mohammad Aftab
Brendan Rodoni
Contact email mohammad.aftab@agriculture.vic.gov.au
Contact phone 0470300399
Year(s) 2022 - 2023
Contributor Agriculture Victoria
Trial location(s) Blyth, SA
Kadina, SA
Melton, SA
Pinery, SA
Beulah, VIC
Curyo, VIC
Horsham, VIC
Quantifying the yield risk of planting CMV infected lentil seed in the southern region locations
Aims

The aim of this project is to quantify the yield risk associated with planting CMV infected lentil seed in the Southern region. To do this, field experiments were conducted in key lentil growing areas over 2 years. This was done by:

  • determining the impact of sowing different levels of CMV-infected seed on:
    • Disease progress throughout the season
    • Grain yield
    • Subsequent incidence of virus level in harvested seed for all treatments.
  • Assessing the rate of CMV transmission via seed for different lentil cultivars, and
  • Investigating lentil varietal susceptibility to CMV infection

The long-term outcome of this project is to reduce the levels of plant viruses such as CMV and minimise yield losses resulting from these plant pathogens in cropping systems in south-eastern Australia.

Key messages

Following are some generalisations that can be used by growers based on the risk matrix:

1.       An effective control strategy for growers is to plant lentil cultivars that are resistant to CMV infection.

2.       An effective control strategy for growers is to sow lentil seeds with zero levels of CMV infected seed.  In this scenario the only source of CMV inoculum is from migratory aphids moving from CMV infected alternate hosts onto the lentil crop, and for this infection event to happen early in the growing season to have a negative impact on lentil yield.

3.       There is a moderate risk to growers to plant lentil seed with 1% CMV infection for moderately resistant, tolerant or moderately susceptible lentil cultivars, while susceptible cultivars will have a measurable reduction in yield.  These impacts will be influenced by the abundance of aphid vectors in the crop, particularly early in the season. 

4.       There is a major risk to growers to sow tolerant, moderately susceptible or susceptible cultivars of lentil with 2-3 % infection levels of CMV in seed at sowing.

5.       There is a major risk to growers to sow moderately resistant, tolerant, moderately susceptible or susceptible cultivars of lentil with greater than 3% infection levels of CMV in seed at sowing.

Informed management strategies driven by the Risk Matrix guide will have a long-term outcome of reducing the levels of, and yield losses resulting from, the viral disease caused by CMV in the lentil cropping system.

Lead research organisation Agriculture Victoria
Host research organisation Agriculture Victoria
Trial funding source GRDC DJP2111-0001RTX
Trial funding source AgVic
Related program N/A
Acknowledgments N/A
Other trial partners South Australian Research and Development Institute (SARDI) and Global Grain Genetics
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop type Grain Legume: Lentils
Treatment type(s)
  • Pest Management : Viral
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Randomised,Replicated

Blyth 2023

Sow rate or Target density 120 plants/m2
Sow date 9 June 2022
Harvest date 15 January 2023
Trial design method RCBD Randomised Complete Block Design
Trial design arrangement 4 rows x 12 cols
Total plots 48
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication 4
Plot randomisation N

Kadina 2023

Sow rate or Target density 120 plants/m2
Sow date 9 June 2022
Harvest date 15 January 2023
Trial design method RCBD Randomised Complete Block Design
Trial design arrangement 4 rows x 12 cols
Total plots 48
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication 4
Plot randomisation N

Melton 2022

Sow rate or Target density 120 plants/m2
Sow date 9 June 2022
Harvest date 15 January 2023
Trial design method RCBD Randomised Complete Block Design
Trial design arrangement 4 rows x 12 cols
Total plots 48
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication 4
Plot randomisation N

Pinery 2022

Sow rate or Target density 120 plants/m2
Sow date 9 June 2022
Harvest date 15 January 2023
Trial design method RCBD Randomised Complete Block Design
Trial design arrangement 4 rows x 12 cols
Total plots 48
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication 4
Plot randomisation N

Beulah 2022

Sow rate or Target density 120 plants/m2
Sow date 9 June 2022
Harvest date 15 January 2023
Trial design method RCBD Randomised Complete Block Design
Trial design arrangement 4 rows x 12 cols
Total plots 48
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication 4
Plot randomisation N

Curyo 2023

Sow rate or Target density 120 plants/m2
Sow date 9 June 2022
Harvest date 15 January 2023
Trial design method RCBD Randomised Complete Block Design
Trial design arrangement 4 rows x 12 cols
Total plots 48
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication 4
Plot randomisation N

Horsham 2022

Sow rate or Target density 120 plants/m2
Sow date 9 June 2022
Harvest date 15 January 2023
Trial design method RCBD Randomised Complete Block Design
Trial design arrangement 4 rows x 12 cols
Total plots 48
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication 4
Plot randomisation N

Horsham 2023

Sow rate or Target density 120 plants/m2
Sow date 9 June 2022
Harvest date 15 January 2023
Trial design method RCBD Randomised Complete Block Design
Trial design arrangement 4 rows x 12 cols
Total plots 48
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication 4
Plot randomisation N
Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information
Trial source data and summary not available
Check the trial report PDF for trial results.
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Not specified
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Blyth, SA Not specified
Kadina, SA Not specified
Melton, SA Not specified
Pinery, SA Not specified
Beulah, VIC Not specified
Curyo, VIC Not specified
Horsham, VIC Not specified
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
Blyth, SA Chromosol
Kadina, SA
Melton, SA Calcarosol
Pinery, SA Chromosol
Beulah, VIC Calcarosol
Curyo, VIC Calcarosol
Horsham, VIC Calcarosol

Climate

Derived climate information

No observed climate data available for this trial.
Derived climate data is determined from trial site location and national weather sources.

Blyth VIC

Kadina VIC

Melton VIC

Pinery VIC

Beulah VIC

Curyo VIC

Horsham VIC

Blyth VIC

NOTE: Exact trial site locality unknown - Climate data may not be accurate
Loading
Loading
Loading

Kadina VIC

NOTE: Exact trial site locality unknown - Climate data may not be accurate
Loading
Loading
Loading

Melton VIC

NOTE: Exact trial site locality unknown - Climate data may not be accurate
Loading
Loading
Loading

Pinery VIC

NOTE: Exact trial site locality unknown - Climate data may not be accurate
Loading
Loading
Loading

Beulah VIC

NOTE: Exact trial site locality unknown - Climate data may not be accurate
Loading
Loading
Loading

Curyo VIC

NOTE: Exact trial site locality unknown - Climate data may not be accurate
Loading
Loading
Loading

Horsham VIC

Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.

Trial report and links

2022 trial report



Trial last modified: 07-06-2024 11:42am AEST